Thermodynamic analysis of enzyme enantioselectivity: a statistical approach by means of new differential HybridMIF descriptors

References

• Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Dinola A, Haak JR. 1984. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarius AS, Blum JK, Abrahamson MJ. 2011. Status of protein engineering for biocatalysts: how to design an industrially useful biocatalyst. Curr Opin Chem Biol 15:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond SD, Leimkuhler BJ, Laird BB. 1999. The Nosé-Poincaré method for constant temperature molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 151:114–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braiuca P, Knapic L, Ferrario V, Ebert C, Gardossi L. 2009. A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model for predicting the enantioselectivity of Candida antarctica lipase B. Adv Synth Catal 351:1293–1302.
   Google Scholar
• Felluga F, Pitacco G, Valentin E, Coslanich A, Fermeglia M, Ferrone M, Pricl S. 2003. Studying enzyme enantioselectivity using combined ab initio and free energy calculations: alfa-chymotrypsin and methyl cis- and trans-5-oxo-2-pentylpirrolidine-3-carboxylates. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 14:3385–3399.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario V, Braiuca P, Tessaro P, Knapic L, Gruber C, Pleiss J, Ebert C, Eichhorn E, Gardossi L. 2012. Elucidating the structural and conformational factors responsible for the activity and substrate specificity of alkanesulfonate mono oxygenase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 30:74–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RJ, Huisman GW. 2008. Enzyme optimization: moving from blind evolution to statistical exploration of sequence-function space. Trends Biotechnol 26:132–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodford PJ. 1985. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 28:849–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A. 2006. Industrial application of microbial lipases. Enzyme Microb Tech 39:235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke E, Bornscheuer U, Schmid R, Pleiss J. 2003. A molecular mechanism of enantiorecognition of tertiary alcohols by carboxylesterases. Chem Bio Chem 4:485–493.
   Google Scholar
• Kazlauskas RJ, Weissfloch ANE, Rappaport AT, Cuccia LA. 1991. A rule to predict which enantiomer of a secondary alcohol reacts faster in reactions catalyzed by cholesterol esterase, lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia, and lipase from Candida rugosa. J Org Chem 56:2656–2665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard V, Fransson L, Lamare S, Hult K, Graber M. 2007. A water molecule in the stereospecificity pocket of Candida antarctica lipase B enhances enantioselectivity towards Pentan-2-ol. ChemBioChem 8:662–667.
   Google Scholar
• Orrenius C, Haeffner F, Rotticci D, Ohrner N, Norin T, Hult K. 1998. Chiral recognition of alcohol enantiomers in acyl transfer reactions catalysed by Candida antarctica lipase B. Biocatal Biotransform 16:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson J, Fransson L, Hult K. 2002. Substrate entropy in enzyme enantioselectivity: an experimental and molecular modeling study of a lipase. Protein Sci 11:1462–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson J, Rotticci-Mulder JC, Rotticci D, Hult K. 2001. Rational design of enantioselective enzymes requires consideration of entropy. Protein Sci 10:1769–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Benjamin S, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Krieger N, Soccol VT. 2009. The realm of microbial lipases in biotechnology. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 29:119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Pham VT, Phillips RS, Ljungdahl LG. 1989. Temperature-dependent enantiospecificity of secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from hermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. J Am Chem Soc 111:1935–1936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips RS. 1992. Temperature effects on stereochemistry of enzymatic reactions. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:417–419.
   Google Scholar
• Raza S, Fransson L, Hult K. 2001. Enantioselectivity in Candida antarctica lipase B: a molecular dynamics study. Protein Sci 10:329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strajbl M, Sham YY, Villa J, Chu ZT, Warshel A. 2000. Calculations of activation entropies of chemical reactions in solution. J Phys Chem B 104:4578–4584.
   Google Scholar
• Uppenberg J, Hansen MT, Patkar S, Jones TA. 1994. The sequence, crystal structure determination and refinement of two crystal forms of lipase B from Candida antarctica. Structure 2:293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppenberg J, Ohrner N, Norin M, Hult K, Kleywegt GJ, Patkar S, Waagen V, Anthonsen T, Jones TA. 1995. Crystallo grafic and molecular-modeling studies of lipase B from Candida antarctica reveals a stereospecificity pocket for secondary alcohols. Biochemistry 34:16838–16851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallin M, Syren PO, Hult K. 2010. Mutant lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of bulky phenyl alkyl sec-alcohols: a thermodynamic analysis of enantioselectivity. ChemBioChem 11:411–416.
   Google Scholar
• Villa J, Strajbl M, Glennon TM, Sham YY, Chu ZT, Warshel A. 2000. How important are entropic contributions to enzyme catalysis?Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11899–11904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2:37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold S. 2001. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58:109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar