2,306
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Application of a novel integrated toxicity testing strategy incorporating “3R” principles of animal research to evaluate the safety of a new agrochemical sulfoxaflor

, , , , &
Pages 1-14 | Received 10 Oct 2013, Accepted 29 Mar 2014, Published online: 16 May 2014

References

  • Babcock JM, Gerwick CB, Huang JX, Loso MR, Nakamura G, Nolting SP, et al. (2011). Biological characterization of sulfoxaflor, a novel insecticide. Pest Manag Sci, 67, 328–34.
  • Barton HA, Pastoor TP, Baetcke K, Chambers JE, Diliberto J, Doerrer NG, et al. (2006). The acquisition and application of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data in agricultural chemical safety assessments. Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 9–35.
  • Boobis AR, Cohen SM, Dellarco V, McGregor D, Meek ME, Vickers C, et al. (2006). IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans. Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 781–92.
  • Boobis AR, Doe JE, Heinrich-Hirsch B, Meek ME, Munn S, Ruchirawat M, et al. (2008). IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans. Crit Rev Toxicol, 38, 87–96.
  • Carmichael NG, Barton HA, Boobis AR, Cooper RL, Dellarco VL, Doerrer NG, et al. (2006). Agricultural chemical safety assessment: a multisector approach to the modernization of human safety requirements. Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 1–7.
  • Cooper RL, Lamb JC, Barlow SM, Bentley K, Brady AM, Doerrer NG, et al. (2006). A tiered approach to life stages testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 69–98.
  • Council of Canadian Academies. (2012). Integrating Emerging Technologies into Chemical Safety Assessment: The Expert Panel on the Integrated Testing of Pesticides. ISBN 978–1-926558–38-7, Ottawa, Canada: Council of Canadian Academics.
  • Creton S, Billington R, Davies W, Dent MP, Hawksworth GM, Parry S, Travis KZ. (2009). Application of toxicokinetics to improve chemical risk assessment: implications for the use of animals. Regul Tox Pharmacol, 55, 291–9.
  • Doe JE, Boobis AR, Blacker A, Dellarco V, Doerrer NG, Franklin C, et al. (2006). A tiered approach to systemic toxicity testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 37–68.
  • EC (European Commission). (July. (2009)). Guidance to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures.
  • ECHA. (2008). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Guidance on toxicokinetics. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki. Chapter .R7.12.
  • Ellis-Hutchings RG, Rasoulpour RJ, Terry C, Carney EW, Billington R. (2014). Human relevance evaluation of a nAChR-medicated fetal muscle contracture mode of action induced by sulfoxaflor. Crit Rev Toxicol, 44, 45–62.
  • Embry MR, Bachman A, Bell D, Boobis A, Cohen SM, Dellarco M, et al. (2014). The Risk Assessment in the 21st Century (RISK21): Roadmap and Matrix. Crit Rev Toxicol, in press.
  • Hasiwa N, Bailey J, Clausing P, Daneshian M, Eileraas M, Farkas S, et al. (2011). Critical evaluation of the use of dogs in biomedical research and testing in Europe. ALTEX, 28, 326–40.
  • Hays SM, Aylward LL. (2009). Using biomonitoring equivalents to interpret human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context. J Appl Toxicol, 29, 275–88.
  • Health Canada, Pest Management Regulatory Agency (2011). 2,4-D (DXA) herbicide. - Enhanced One-Generation Reproduction Study Health Canada, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Ottawa, Ontario.
  • Kobel W, Fegert I, Billington R, Lewis R, Betley K, Bomann W, et al. (2010). A 1-year toxicity study in dogs is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides. Crit Rev Toxicol, 40, 1–15.
  • Ladics GS, Smith C, Heaps K, Elliott GS, Slone TW, Loveless SE. (1995). Possible incorporation of an immunotoxicological functional assay for assessing humoral immunity for hazard identification purposes in rats on standard toxicology study. Toxicology, 96, 225–38.
  • Laviano A, Meguid M, Gleason J, Yang ZJ, Renvyle T. (1996). Comparison of long-term feeding pattern between male and female Fischer 344 rats: influence of estrous cycle. Am J Physiol, 270 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 39), R413–R419.
  • LeBaron MJ, Gollapudi B, Terry C, Billington R, Rasoulpour RJ. (2014). Human relevance framework for rodent liver tumors induced by the insecticide sulfoxaflor. Crit Rev Toxicol, 44, 15–24.
  • LeBaron MJ, Geter DR, Rasoulpour RJ, Gollapudi BB, Thomas J, Murray J, et al. (2013). An integrated approach for prospectively investigating a mode-of-action for rodent liver effects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 270, 164–73.
  • Longhurst C, Babcock JM, Denholm I, Gorman K, Thomas JD, Sparks TC. (2012). Cross-resistance relationships of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor with neonicotinoids and other insecticides in the whiteflies Bemisa tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorium. Pest Manag Sci, 69, 809–13.
  • Meek ME, Bucher JR, Cohen SM, Dellarco V, Hill RN, Lehman-McKeeman LD, et al. (2003). A framework for human relevance analysis of information on carcinogenic modes of action. Crit Rev Toxicol, 33, 591–653.
  • NC3Rs. (2011). National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. Available at: http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id = 7. Last Accessed on: 13th June 2013.
  • OECD. (2002). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 32 and OECD Series on Pesticides Number 10: Guidance Notes for Analysis and Evaluation of Repeat-Dose Toxicity Studies. ENV/JM/MPM(2000)18.
  • OECD. (2008). Guideline for the testing of chemicals - draft proposal for a revised TG 417: Toxicokinetics, Paris, France. November 2008.
  • OECD. (2009). Guideline for the testing of chemicals - draft proposal for an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study, Paris, France. October 2009.
  • OECD. (2010). Draft guidance document No. 116 on the design and conduct of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies, supporting TG 451, 452, 453, Paris, France. April 2010.
  • Rasoulpour RJ, Ellis-Hutchings RG, Terry C, Millar NS, Zablotny CL, Gibb A, et al. (2012). A novel mode-of-action mediated by the fetal muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor resulting in developmental toxicity in rats. Toxicol Sci, 127, 522–34.
  • Rasoulpour RJ, Terry C, LeBaron MJ, Stebbins K, Ellis-Hutchings RJ, Billington R. (2014). Mode-of-action/human relevance framework for rat Leydig cell tumors mediated by sulfoxaflor. Crit Rev Toxicol, 44, 25–44.
  • Rhomberg LR, Baetcke K, Blancato J, Bus J, Cohen S, Conolly R, et al. (2007). Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection. Crit Rev Toxicol, 37, 729–837.
  • Russell WMS, Burch RL. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen, ISBN: 0900767782.
  • Saghir SA, Marty MS, Zablotny CL, Passage JK, Perala AW, Bus JS, et al. (2013). Life-stage-, sex- and dose-dependent dietary toxicokinetics and relationship to toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in rats: implications for toxicity test dose selection, design and interpretation. Toxicol Sci, 136, 294–307.
  • Saghir SA, Mendrala AL, Bartels MJ, Day SJ, Hansen SC, Sushynski JM, Bus JM. (2006). Strategies to assess systemic exposure of chemicals in subchronic/chronic diet and drinking water studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 211, 245–60.
  • Saghir SA, Rick DL, Clark AJ, Staley JL, Bartels MJ, Terry C, Billington R. (2011). Integration of toxicokinetics into guideline toxicity studies of a new agrochemical. The Toxicologist, 120, 2107.
  • Saghir SA, Bartels MJ, Rick DL, McCoy AT, Rasoulpour RJ, Ellis-Hutchings RG, et al. (2012). Assessment of diurnal systemic dose of agrochemicals in regulatory toxicity testing – an integrated approach without additional animal use. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 63, 321–32.
  • Seed J, Carney EW, Corley RA, Crofton KM, DeSesso JM, Foster PM, et al. (2005). Overview: using mode of action and life stage information to evaluate the human relevance of animal toxicity data. Crit Rev Toxicol, 35, 664–72.
  • Slikker W Jr, Andersen ME, Bogdanffy MS, Bus JS, Cohen SD, Conolly RB, et al. (2004a). Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity: case studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 201, 226–94.
  • Slikker W Jr, Andersen ME, Bogdanffy MS, Bus JS, Cohen SD, Conolly RB, et al. (2004b). Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 201, 203–25.
  • Sonich-Mullin C, Fielder R, Wiltse J, Baetcke K, Dempsey J, Fenner-Crisp P, et al. (2001). IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 34, 146–52.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008). 2,4-D. Expedited review. Pharmacokinetic/Range-Finding Studies for Extended F1 1-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study. Decision No. 395649, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010). 2,4-D: review of extended 1-generation repoduction study and dose-range-finding and pharmacokinetic titration studies. Decision No. 431951, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • Watson GB, Loso MR, Babcock JM, Hasler JM, Letherer TJ, Young CD, et al. (2011). Novel nicotinic action of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor. Insec Biochem Mol Biol, 41, 432–9.
  • Zhu Y, Loso MR, Watson GB, Sparks TC, Rogers RB, Huang JX, et al. (2011). Discovery and characterization of sulfoxaflor, a novel insecticide targeting sap-feeding pests. J Agric Food Chem, 59, 2950–7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.