References
- Gale R P, Park R E, DuBois R, et al. Delphi‐panel analysis of appropriateness of hig‐dose chemotherapy and blood cell or bone marrow autotransplants in diffuse large‐cell lymphoma. Leukemia and Lymphoma. 1999; 32: 139–49
- Brook R H, Chassin M R, Fink A. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Intl J of Tech Assess Health Care. 1986; 2: 53–63
- Brook R H. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Methodology Perspectives, K A McCormick, S R Moore, R A Siegel. AHCPR Pub. No. 95–0009, Public Health Service, US. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, 59–70
- Memck N J, Fink A, Park R E, et al. Derivation of clinical indications for carotid endarterectomy by an expert panel. Am J Public Health. 1987; 77: 187–190
- Chassin M. How do we decide whether an investigation or procedure is appropriate?. Appropriate Investigation and Treatment in Clinical Practice: Papers Based on November 1988 conference of Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, A Hopkins
- Shekelle P G, Kahan J P, Bernstein S J, Leape L L, Kamberg C J, Park R E. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. New Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1888–95
- Kravitz R L, Laouri M, Kahan J P, Guzy P, Sherman T, Hil‐borne L, Brook R H. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. JAMA. 1995; 274: 632–638
- Selby J V, Fireman B H, Lundstrom R J, et al. Variation among hospitals in coronary angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization. New Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1888–96
- Shekelle P G, Chassin M R, Park R E. Assessing the predictive validity of the RANDRTCLA Appropriateness Method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 1998; 14: 707–727
- Rutkow I M, Gittelsohn A M, Zuidema G D. Surgical decision making: The reliability of clinical judgment. Ann Surg. 1979; 190(3)409–419
- Chalmers T C, Bemer J, Sacks H S, et al. Meta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree. Statistics in Medicine 1987; 6: 733–44
- LeLorier I, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, et al. Discrepencies between meta‐analyses and subsequent large randomized, clinical tilas. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 536–42