Program Factors and Treatment Outcomes in Drug Dependence Treatment: An Examination Using Meta-Analysis

References

• Allison M., Hubbard R. L. Drug abuse treatment process: A review of the literature. Int. J. Addict. 1985; 20(9)1321–1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Hser Y.-I. Treatment of drug abuse. Drugs and Crime, M. Tonry, J. Q. Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990; 393–460
   Google Scholar
• Apsler R., Harding W. M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug abuse treatment: Current status and recommendations for future research. Background Papers on Drug Abuse Financing and Services Research. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1991; 58–81, (NIDA Drug Abuse Services Research Series 1
   Google Scholar
• Ball J. C., Ross A. The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients. Programs. Services, and Outcomes. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 1991
   Google Scholar
• Berg W. E. Evaluation of community-based drug abuse treatment programs: A review of the research literature. The Addiction Process: Effective Social Work Approaches, E. M. Freeman. Longman, New York 1992; 81–95
   Google Scholar
• Brown B. S. Treatment of non-opiate dependency: Issues and outcomes. Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, R. G. Smart, F. B. Glaser, Y. Israel, et al. Plenum Press, New York 1984; Vol. 8
   Google Scholar
• Caplehorn J. R., Bell J. Methadone dosage and retention of patients in maintenance treatment. Med. J. Austr. 1991; 154: 195–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplehorn J. R., Bell J., Kleinbaum D. G., Gebski V. J. Methadone dose and heroin use during maintenance treatment. Addiction 1993; 88(1)119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (2nd ed.). Academic Press, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H. M. Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews (2nd ed). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• The Handbook of Research Synthesis, H. M. Cooper, L. V. Hedges. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Research on the Treatment of Narcotics Addiction: Slate of the Art(NIDA Treatment Research Monograph), J. R. Cooper, F. Altman, B. S. Brown, D. Czechowicz. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1983
   Google Scholar
• Craddock S. G., Rounds-Bryant J. L., Flynn P. M., Hubbard R. L. Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1997; 23(1)43–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Aunno T., Vaughn T. E. Variations in methadone treatment practice: Results from a national survey. JAMA 1992; 267(2; January 8)253–258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterbrook P. J., Berlin J. A., Gopalan R., Matthews D. R. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etheridge R. M., Hubbard R. L., Anderson J., Craddock S. G., Flynn P. M. Treatment structure and program services in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol. Addict. Behav. 1997; 11(4)244–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo P. Meta-analysis: Mixed meta-phor. Am. Psychol. 1978; 33(5)515–517
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D. R., Harwood H. J. Treating Drug Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990; Vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Glass G. V., McGaw B., Smith M. L. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills 1981
   Google Scholar
• Gresham F. M., Gansle K. A., Noell G. N., Cohen S., Rosenblum S. Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. School Psychol. Rev. 1993; 22(2)254–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges L. V., Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, Inc, Orlando, FL 1985
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. L., Marsden M. E., Rachal J. V., Harwood H. J., Cavanaugh E. R., Ginzburg H. M. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1989
   Google Scholar
• Joe G. W., Singh B. K., Lehman W., Simpson D. D., Sells S. B. Agency differences in post-treatment outcomes: A follow-up of drug abuse treatment clients. Int. J. Addict. 1983; 18(4)523–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleber H. D. Treatment of drug dependence: What works. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 1989; 1: 81–100
   Google Scholar
• Ling W., Charuvastra C., Kaim S. C., Klett C. J. Methadyl acetate and methadone maintenance treatments for heroin addicts. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1976; 33: 709–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey M. W., Wilson D. B. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. Am. Psychol. 1993; 48(12)1181–1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaughrin W. C., Price R. H. Effective outpatient drug treatment organizations. Program features and selection effects. Int. J. Addict. 1992; 27(11)1335–1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlothlin W. H., Anglin M. D. Long-term follow-up of clients of high-and low-dose methadone programs. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1981; 38: 1055–1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Alterman A. I., Cacciola J., Metzger D., O'Brien C. P. A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the Treatment Services Review. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1992; 180(2)101–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Grissom G. R., Brill P., Durell J. Private substance abuse treatments: Are some programs more effective than others?. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1993; 10(3)243–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., O'Brien C. P., Metzger D., Alterman A. I., Cornish J., Urschel H. How effective is substance abuse treatment: Compared to what?. Addictive States, C. P. O'Brien, J. H. Jaffe. Raven Press, New York 1992; 231–252
   Google Scholar
• Magura S., Nwakeze P. C., Kang S.-Y., Demsky S. Program quality effects on patient outcomes during methadone maintenance: A study of 17 clinics. Subst. Use Misuse 1999; 34(9)1299–1327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsch L. A. The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behaviors, and criminality: A meta-analysis. Addiction 1998; 93(4)515–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos R. H., Petit B., Gruber V. A. Characteristics and outcomes of three models of community residential care for substance abuse patients. J. Subst. Abuse 1995; 7: 99–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moos R. H., Finney J. W., Ouimette P. C., Suchinsky R. T. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: I. Treatment orientation, amount of care and 1-year outcomes. Alcoholism Clin. Exper. Res. 1999; 23(3)529–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos R. H., Moos B. S. The staff workplace and the quality and outcome of substance abuse treatment. J. Stud. Alcohol 1998; 59(1)43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos R. H., King M. J., Burnett E. B., Andrassy J. M. Community residential program policies, services, and treatment orientations influence patients' participation in treatment. J. Subst. Abuse 1997; 9: 171–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moos R. H., Mertens J. R., Brennan P. L. Program characteristics and readmission among older substance abuse patients: Comparisons with middle-aged and younger patients. J. Merit. Health Admin. 1995; 22(4)332–345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polinsky M. L., Hser Y., Anglin M. D., Maglione M. A. Drug-user treatment programs in a large metropolitan area. Subst. Use Misuse 1998; 33(8)1739–1761
   Google Scholar
• Presby S. Overly broad categories obscure important differences between therapies. Am. Psychol. 1978; 33(5)514–515
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 1979; 86: 638–641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (revised ed.). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Salend S. J. Therapy outcome research: Threats to treatment integrity. Behav. Modif. 1984; 8(2)211–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson D. D. Treatment for drug abuse: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1981; 38: 875–880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Brown B. S. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol. Addict. Behav. 1997; 11(4)294–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisk J. E., Hatziandreu E. J., Hughes R. The Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment: Implications for Controlling AIDS/HIV Infection. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC 1990, (AIDS-Related Issues Background Paper 6)
   Google Scholar
• Strain E. C., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I., Stitzer M. L. Moderate- vs. high-dose methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: A randomized trial. JAMA 1999; 281: 1000–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timko C. Physical characteristics of residential psychiatric and substance abuse programs: Organizational determinants and patient outcomes. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 1996; 24(1)173–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeaton W. H., Sechrest L. Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1981; 49(2)156–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar