Drug User Organizations in the Nordic Countries—Local, National, and International Dimensions

REFERENCES

• Anker, J. (2004). Contesting the meaning of active citizenship: The dynamics and strategies of associations of unemployed persons in Denmark. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 14(1), 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, J. (2006). Active drug users. Struggling for rights and recognition. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 37–60). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, J. (2007). Limits and opportunities for autonomous user organisations in Denmark and Sweden. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, J. (2008). Organising homeless people. Exploring the emergence of a user organisation in Denmark. Critical Social Policy, 28(1), 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anker, J. (2009). Speaking for the homeless. Opportunities, strengths and dilemmas of a user organisation. European Journal of Homelessness, 3, 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, J., Asmussen, V., Kouvonen, P., & Tops, D. (Eds.). (2006). Drug users and spaces for legitimate action. Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, V. (2003). User participation: Possibilities and limitations in Danish social services directed towards drug users. In E. Houborg Pedersen & C. Tigerstedt (Eds.), Regulating drugs (pp. 11–32). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, V. (2006). On whose terms? User participation in Danish methadone maintenance treatment. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 205–226). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, V. (2008). Danish drug policy—Shifting from liberalism to repression. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 8(2), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, V., & Dahl, H. V. (2002). Skadesreduktion som forebyggelse på stofmisbrugsområdet. Nordisk Alkohol—og narkotikatidsskrift (NAT), 19(4), 249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen, V., & Jöhncke, S. (2004). Indtroduktion: perspektiver på brugere [Introduction: Perspectives on users]. In V. Asmussen & S. Jöhncke (Eds.), Brugerperspektiver—Fra stofmisbrug til socialpolitik? [User Perspectives. From Drug Use to Social Policy?] (pp. 9–38). Århus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crofts, N., Kaldor, J. M., Elford, J., Wodak, A., & Kidd, S. (1993). A history of peer-based drug-user groups in Australia. Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies (ENCOD). (2009). Drugs and diplomacy. Retrieved August 2009, from http://www.encod.org/info/IMG/pdf/DRUGS_AND_DIPLOMA CY_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2004). EU drugs strategy (2005–2012). Brussels: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., Des Jarlais, D., Sotheran, J. L., Garber, J., Cohen, H., & Smith, D. (1987). AIDS and the self-organization among intravenous drug users. International Journal of the Addictions, 22(3), 201–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T. (2005). Samhället i narkotikan. Borgå: Academic Publishing of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, P., Tigerstedt, C., & Laursen, L. (Eds.). (1996). Discussing drugs and control policy: Comparative studies on four Nordic countries. Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, P., Tigerstedt, C., & Tammi, T. (2007). Two tracks drug policy—Normalisation of the drug Problem in Finland. Drugs, Education, Prevention and Policy, 14(6), 543–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge, R. (1992). Norsk Narkotikapolitikk—En beskrivelse og vurdering. In H. Waal & A. Middlethon (Eds.), Narkotikaforebygging mot år 2000 (pp. 151–160). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Herkt, D. (1993). Peer-based user groups: The Australian experience. In N. Heather, A. Wodak, E. Nadelmann, & P. O'Hare (Eds.), Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: From faith to science (pp. 320–330). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (Eds.). (1999). Harm reduction: National and international perspectives. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen, J. (2004). Brugerforeninger—Selvorganisering, interessevaretagelse og gensidig støtte. In V. Asmussen & S. Jöhncke (Eds.), Brugerperspektiver—Fra stofmisbrug til socialpolitik? (pp. 169–191). Århus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2006). The development of user influence on Swedish drug policy 1965–2004. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 131–158). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, H., & Noakes, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Frames of protest. Social movements and the framing perspective. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, T., Small, W., Peeace, W., Douglas, D., Pierre, A., & Wood, E. (2006). Harm reduction by a “user-run” organization: A case study of the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU). International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlatt, G. A. (1998). Basic principles and strategies of harm reduction. In G. A. Marlatt (Ed.), Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high risk behavior (pp. 49–68). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Preface. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing (pp. xi–xiv). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mold, A., & Berridge, V. (2008). “The rise of the user”? Voluntary organizations, the state and illegal drugs in England since the 1960s. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 15(5), 451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, J. (2006). The consumer, the weak, the sick and the innocent—Constructions of “the user” by the Swedish Users Union. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 159–182). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reitox National Focal Point (2008). “SWEDEN” new development, trends and in-depth information on selected issues (2008 National report (2007 data) to the EMCDDA). Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction and Statens Folkhälsoinstitut
   Google Scholar
• Rönkä, S., & Virtanen, A. (2009). Huumetilanne Suomessa 2009 [Drug situation in Finland 2009] ( Raportti 40/2009). Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).
   Google Scholar
• Sirus (2009). Alcohol and drugs in Norway. Oslo: Sirus Statens Institutt for Rusmiddelforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Solinge, T. B. V. (1997). The Swedish drug control system. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Jan Mets.
   Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2005). Discipline or contain? The struggle over the concept of harm reduction in the 1997 Drug Policy Committee in Finland. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(6), 384–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2006). Who is the expert? The patient groups and the Finnish substitution treatment policy. In V. Asmussen, J. Anker, D. Tops, & P. Kouvonen (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (p. 49). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2007). Medicalising prohibition. Harm reduction in Finnish and international drug policy ( Research Rep No. 161). Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, H. (1998). Swedish drug policy: A successful model? European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 6, 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Tops, D. (2006). Stretching the limits of drug policies. An uneasy balancing act. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 61–84). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Wijngaart, G. F. (1991). Comparing perspectives on drug use: The Dutch experience. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Willersrud, A. B., & Olsen, H. (2006). Democracy or closer control? Emergence of drug user participation in Norway. In J. Anker, V. Asmussen, P. Kouvonen, & D. Tops (Eds.), Drug users and spaces for legitimate action (pp. 85–104). Helsinki: NAD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M. N., & McCarthy, J. D. (1987). Social movements in an organizational society: Collected essays. Oxford: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar