Does It Matter What Friends Think, Say, or Do? The Role of Friends’ Smoking Attitudes and Behavior for Dutch Adolescents’ Smoking Behavior

REFERENCES

• Akers, R. L., & Cochran, J. K. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 6(4), 323–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant vehavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977b). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bidstrup, P. E., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., Mortensen, E. L., Vinther-Larsen, M., & Johansen, C. (2011). Critical discussion of socialcognitive factors in smoking initiation among adolescents. Acta Oncologica, 50(1), 88–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burk, W. J., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 397–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, A. B. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations. American Sociological Review, 35(5), 843–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H. (1995). Socio-economic differences in smoking: Dutch adolescents’ beliefs and behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 41(3), 419–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Engels, R., Kremers, S., Wetzels, J., & Mudde, A. (2003). Parents’ and friends’ smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: Findings from six European countries. Health Education Research, 18(5), 627–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, R. C. M. E. (1998). Forbidden fruits, social dynamics in smoking and drinking behavior of adolescents. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, R. C. M. E., Scholte, R. H. J., van Lieshout, C. F. M., de Kemp, R., & Overbeek, G. (2006). Peer group reputation and smoking and alcohol consumption in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 31(3), 440–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(3), 226–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(74), 653–663.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselager, G. J. T., Hartup, W. W., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A. (1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69(4), 1198–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1961). Social exchange among equals and unequals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30(4), 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isensee, B., & Hanewinkel, R. (2012). Meta-analysis on the effects of the smoke-free class competition on smoking prevention in adolescents. European Addiction Research, 18(3), 110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesner, J., Poulin, F., & Nicotra, E. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74(5), 1328–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremers, S. P. J., Mudde, A. N., de Vries, N. K., Brug, J., & de Vries, H. (2004). Unplanned smoking initiation: New insights and implications for interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(3), 345–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconcious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maggs, J. L., & Hurrelmann, K. (1998). Do substance use and delinquency have differential associations with adolescents’ peer relations? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(2), 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010a). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32(1), 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010b). Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: A social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addiction, 105(7), 1280–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., & Vries, H. D. (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 69(10), 1506–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monshouwer, K., Van Dorsselaer, S., Gorter, A., Verdurmen, J., & Vollebergh, W. (2004). Jeugd en Riskant Gedrag. Kerngegevens uit het peilstationonderzoek 2003 [Youth and risky behavior: Key facts from the 2003 Sentinel Survey]. Utrecht: Trimbos instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Monshouwer, K., Verdurmen, J., van Dorsselaer, S. V., Smit, E., Gorter, A., & Vollebergh, W. (2008). Jeugd en Riskant gedrag 2007. Kerngegevens uit het peilstationonderzoek scholieren [Youth and risky behavior in 2007. Key data from the Sentinel Survey Students]. Utrecht: Trimbos Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A. & Preciado, P. (2013). Manual for RSiena, Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/∼snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (Ed.) (2009). Encyclopedia of complexity and system science, Verlag: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & van de Bunt, G. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, H. D., Backbier, E., Kok, G., & Dijkstra, M. (1995). The impact of social influences in the context of attitude, self-efficacy, intention, and previous behavior as predictors of smoking onset1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–257.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenknecht, L. E., Burke, G. L., Perkins, L. L., Haley, N. J., & Friedman, G. D. (1992). Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA study: A comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels. American Journal of Public Health, 82(1), 33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar