Comparison of traditional and novel tableting excipients: Physical and compaction properties

References

• Saha S, Shahiwala AF. Multifunctional coprocessed excipients for improved tabletting performance. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2009;6:197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge S, Steele DF, Chen A, Tobyn MJ, Staniforth JN. The mechanical properties of compacts of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 2000;200:67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang RC, Peck GR. A systematic evaluation of the compression and tablet characteristics of various types of microcrystalline cellulose. Pharm Technol 2001;25:112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Edge S, Steele DF, Tobyn MJ, Staniforth JN, Chen A. Directional bonding in compacted microcrystalline cellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2001;27:613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolhuis GK, Armstrong NA. Excipients for direct compaction–an update. Pharm Dev Technol 2006;11:111–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood BE, Becker JW. A new class of high-functionality excipients: Silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Pharm Technol 1998;22:78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Aljaberi A, Chatterji A, Shah NH, Sandhu HK. Functional performance of silicified microcrystalline cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose: A case study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35:1066–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobyn MJ, McCarthy GP, Staniforth JN, Edge S. Physicochemical comparison between microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 1998;169:183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele DF, Tobyn M, Edge S, Chen A, Staniforth JN. Physicochemical and mechanical evaluation of a novel high density grade of silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004;30:103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlack H, Bauer-Brandl A, Schubert R, Becker D. Properties of Fujicalin, a new modified anhydrous dibasic calcium phosphate for direct compression: Comparison with dicalcium phosphate dihydrate. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2001;27:789–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takami K, Machimura H, Takado K, Inagaki M, Kawashima Y. Novel preparation of free flowing spherically granulated dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous for direct tabletting. Chem Pharm Bull 1996;44:868–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentzschel CM, Sakmann A, Leopold CS. Suitability of various excipients as carrier and coating materials for liquisolid compacts. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010: DOI:10.3109/03639045.2011.564184.
   Google Scholar
• Brunauer S, Emmet PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 1938;60:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. The tensile strength of lactose tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1968;20:657–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221:1001–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221:671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Celik M. Overview of compaction data analysis techniques. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1992;18:767–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iloañusi NO, Schwartz JB. The effect of wax on compaction of microcrystalline cellulose beads made by extrusion and spheronization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1998;24:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duberg M, Nystroem C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. XVII. Porosity-pressure curves for the characterization of volume reduction mechanisms in powder compression. Powder Technol 1986;46:67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. The effect of rate of force application on the properties of microcrystalline cellulose and dibasic calcium phosphate mixtures. Int J Pharm 1991;73:75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilkka J, Paronen P. Prediction of the compression behaviour of powder mixtures by the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm 1993;94:181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochhar SK, Rubinstein MH, Barnes D. Slugging and recompression characterisation of some blends of pharmaceutical excipients. Int J Pharm 1994;112:225–231.
   Google Scholar
• Sun C, Grant DJ. Influence of elastic deformation of particles on Heckel analysis. Pharm Dev Technol 2001;6:193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. An investigation into the capping of paracetamol at increasing speeds of compression. Int J Pharm 1991;72:117–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paronen P. Heckel plots as indicators of elastic properties of pharmaceuticals. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1986;12:1903–1912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuurman K, Van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. Int J Pharm 1999;179:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David ST, Augsburger LL. Plastic flow during compression of directly compressible fillers and its effect on tablet strength. J Pharm Sci 1977;66:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar