Evaluation of a sieve classification method for characterization of low-dose interactive mixtures

References

• Travers DN, White RC. The mixing of micronized sodium bicarbonate with sucrose crystals. J Pharm Pharmacol 1971;23:260S–261S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersey JA. Ordered mixing: A new concept in powder mixing practice. Powder Technol 1975;11:41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström C, Malmqvist K. Studies on direct compression of tablets. I. The effect of particle size in mixing finely divided powders with granules. Acta Pharm Suec 1980;17:282–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staniforth JN. Total mixing. Int J Pharm Tech Prod Manuf 1981;2:7–12.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers MM, Van der Watt JG. The measurement of mixture homogeneity and dissolution to predict the degree of drug agglomerate breakdown achieved through powder mixing. Pharm Res 1994;11:1557–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers MM. Description of the kinetics of the deagglomeration of drug particle agglomerates during powder mixing. Int J Pharm 1997;151:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell-Bredenberg S, Nyström C. The possibility of achieving an interactive mixture with high dose homogeneity containing an extremely low proportion of a micronised drug. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;12:285–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fransén N, Björk E, Nyström C. Development and characterisation of interactive mixtures with a fine-particulate mucoadhesive carrier for nasal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67:370–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC. The mixing of dry powders. Powder Technol 1968;2:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Guidance for industry. Powder blends and finished dosage units- stratified in-process dosage unit sampling and assessment. U.S. Department of Health and Human services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 2003 Rockville, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yip CW, Hersey JA. Segregation in ordered powder mixtures. Powder Technol 1977;16:149–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist K, Nyström C. Studies on direct compression of tablets VIII. Sieve classification method for the determination of agglomerates and the distribution of fine particles in ordered mixing. Acta Pharm Suec 1984;21:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Venables HJ, Wells JI. Powder mixing. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2001;27:599–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco M, Gozález Bañó R, Bertran E. Monitoring powder blending in pharmaceutical processes by use of near infrared spectroscopy. Talanta 2002;56:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TH, Lin SY. Microspectroscopic FT-IR mapping system as a tool to assess blend homogeneity of drug-excipient mixtures. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;23:117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan T, Barber D, Coffin-Beach D, Sun Z, Sevick-Muraca EM. Measurement of low-dose active pharmaceutical ingredient in a pharmaceutical blend using frequency-domain photon migration. J Pharm Sci 2004;93:635–645.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malmqvist K, Nyström C. Studies on direct compression of tablets IX. The effect of scaling-up on the preparation of ordered mixtures in double-cone mixers. Acta Pharm Suec 1984;21:21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel WJ, Nguyen LT. Fluidized bed granulation of an ordered powder mixture. J Pharm Pharmacol 1982;34:692–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderborn G, Duberg M, Nyström C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. X. Measurement of tablet surface area by permeametry. Powder Technol 1985;41:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson B, Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. Effect of pellet size on degree of deformation and densification during compression and on compactability of microcrystalline cellulose pellets. Int J Pharm 1998;163:35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Nyström C, Alderborn G. The use of air permeametry for the assessment of external surface area and sphericity of pelletized granules. Int J Pharm 1993;99:197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin FHH. The mixing of powders and pastes: some basic concepts. Chem Eng 1967;5:CE99–CE106.
   Google Scholar
• Fransén N. Studies on a novel powder formulation for nasal drug delivery. Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2008 (http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-9292). Accessed on 19 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• deHaan P, Deurloo MJ. Low dose dry pharmaceutical preparations. European patent application, publication number EP0503521A1, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan V, Kildsig DO. The effect of particle morphology on the physical stability of pharmaceutical powder mixtures: the effect of surface roughness of the carrier on the stability of ordered mixtures. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• >Zeng XM, Martin GP, Mariott C, Pritchard J. The influence of carrier morphology on drug delivery by dry powder inhalers. Int J Pharm 2000;200:93–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flament MP, Leterme P, Gayot A. The influence of carrier roughness on adhesion, content uniformity and the in vitro deposition of terbutaline sulphate from dry powder inhalers. Int J Pharm 2004;275:201–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielmann F, Burnett DJ, Heng JY. Determination of the surface energy distributions of different processed lactose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2007;33:1240–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Leane M, Olusanmi D, Tobyn M, Supuk E, Khoo J et al. Surface energy analysis as a tool to probe the surface energy characteristics of micronized materials–a comparison with inverse gas chromatography. Int J Pharm 2012;422:238–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Podczeck F. The relationship between particulate properties of carrier materials and the adhesion force of drug particles in interactive powder mixtures. J Adhesion Sci Technol 1997;11:1089–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MC. Particle size distribution of the active ingredient for solid dosage forms of low dosage. Pharm Acta Helv 1972;47:546–559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar