The impact of roller compaction and tablet compression on physicomechanical properties of pharmaceutical excipients

References

• Hlinak AJ, Kuriyan K, Morris KR, et al. Understanding critical material properties for solid dosage form design. J Pharm Innovation 2006;Sep/Oct:12–17
   Google Scholar
• Vachon MG, Chulia D. The use of energy indices in estimating powder compaction functionality of mixtures in pharmaceutical tableting. Int J Pharm 1999;177:183–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain S. Mechanical properties of powders for compaction and tableting: an overview. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1999;2:20–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Final Report on pharmaceutical cGMPs for 21st century – A risk-based approach. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/gmp/gmp2004/GMP_finalreport2004 [last accessed 27 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Tousey MD. The granulation process 101: basic technologies for tablet making. Pharm Tech (Tableting and Granulation) 2002;26:8–13
   Google Scholar
• Brudy J, Bultmann J. Roll compaction: influence of process parameters on ribbon density and tensile strength. AAPS Annual Meeting Abstracts 2004; 2004-001090
   Google Scholar
• Parrott EL. Densification of powders by concavo-convex roller compactor. J Pharm Sci 1981;70:288–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima H, Dave VS, Kidder L, et al. Assessment of the critical factors affecting the porosity of roller compacted ribbons and the feasibility of using NIR chemical imaging to evaluate the porosity distribution. Int J Pharm 2011;410:1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang CK, Alvarez-Nunez FA, Rinella Jr JV, et al. Roller compaction, granulation and capsule product dissolution of drug formulations containing a lactose or mannitol filler, starch, and talc. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2008;9:597–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Secreast PJ, Amidon GE. Mechanistic study of the effect of roller compaction and lubricant on tablet mechanical strength. J Pharm Sci 2007;96:1342–1355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinchuk AV, Mullarney MP, Hancock BC. Simulation of roller compaction using a laboratory scale compaction simulator. Int J Pharm 2004;269:403–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein S, Picker-Freyer KM, Langridge J. Simulation of roller compaction with subsequent tableting and characterization of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Dev Technol 2008;13:523–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkowska S, Khan KA. Effect of re-compression on the properties of tablets prepared by dry granulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1983;9:331–347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LC, Peck GE. The effect of agglomeration methods on the micromeritic properties of a maltodextrin product, Maltrin 150™, Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1990;16:1491–1503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horisawa E, Danjo K, Sunada H. Influence of granulating method on physical and mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose granules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:583–593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag F, Reincke K, Runge J, et al. How do roll compaction/dry granulation affect the tableting behaviour of inorganic materials?: Microhardness of ribbons and mercury porosimetry measurements of tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;22:325–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mollan MJ Jr., Chang N, Çelik M. The effect of reworking on post-compaction properties of microcrystalline cellulose formulations. Pharm Technol 1995;19:2–14
   Google Scholar
• Bultmann JM. Multiple compaction of microcrystalline cellulose in a roller compactor. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2002;54:59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares LL, Ortega GG, Petrovick PR, Schmidt PC. Dry granulation and compression of spray-dried plant extracts. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2005;6:E359–E366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerk CF. Consolidation and compaction of lactose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1993;19:2359–2398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. The effect of rate of force application on the properties of microcrystalline cellulose and dibasic calcium phosphate mixtures. Int J Pharm 1991; 73:75–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochhara SK, Rubinstein MH, Barnes D. Slugging and recompression characterisation of some blends of pharmaceutical excipients. Int J Pharm 1994;112:225–231
   Google Scholar
• Wells JI, Langridge JR. Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate – microcrystalline cellulose systems in direct compression tabletting. Int J Pharm.Tech Prod Mfr 1981;2:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Inghelbrecht S, Remon JP. Roller compaction and tableting of microcrystalline cellulose/drug mixtures. Int J Pharm, 1998;161:215–224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas J, Buckner I, Kumar V. Co-processed excipients with enhanced direct compression functionality for improved tableting performance. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2012;38:1159–1170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Peck GE, Miller RW, Morris KR. Real-time near-infrared monitoring of content uniformity, moisture content, compact density, tensile strength, and Young’s modulus of roller compacted powder blends. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:1589–1597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber L, Hapgood KP, Michaels JN, et al. Unified compaction curve model for tensile strength of tablets made by roller compaction and direct compression. Int J Pharm 2008;346:17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221:671–675
   Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221:1001–1008
   Google Scholar
• York P. Crystal engineering and particle design for the powder compaction process. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1992;18:677–721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. Brittle/ductile behavior in pharmaceutical materials used in tableting. Int J Pharm 1987;36:205–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersey JA, Rees JE. Proceedings of particle size analysis conference, Bradford, England; 1970
   Google Scholar
• Duberg M, Nystrom C. Studies on direct compression of tablets XVII. Porosity-pressure curves for the characterization of volume reduction mechanisms in powder compression. Powder Technol 1986;46:67–75
   Google Scholar
• Ohwoavworhua FO, Adelakun TA, Okhamafe AO. Correlating formulation performance with some physical properties of Α-cellulose from corn cob and melon husk-a comparative study. Continental J Pharm Sci 2007;1:36–45
   Google Scholar
• Kothari SH, Kumar V, Banker GS. Comparative evaluations of powder and mechanical properties of low crystallinity celluloses, microcrystalline celluloses, and powdered celluloses. Int J Pharm 2002;232:69–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal S, Zaghloul A, Khan MA. Effect of extragranular microcrystalline cellulose on compaction, surface roughness, and in vitro dissolution of a self-nanoemulsified solid dosage form of ubiquinone. Pharm Tech 2002;April:86–98
   Google Scholar
• Busignies V, Leclerc B, Truchon S, Tchoreloff P. Changes in the specific surface area of tablets composed of pharmaceutical materials with various deformation behaviors specific surface area and deformation behavior. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2011;37:225–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzovic E. Roller compaction of theophylline [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Basel; 2008:71–78
   Google Scholar
• Busignies V, Leclerc B, Porion P, et al. Compaction behavior and new predictive approach to the compressibility of binary mixtures of pharmaceutical excipients. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;64:66–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz PJ, Parrott EL. Factors influencing axial and radial tensile strengths of tablets. J Pharm Sci 1982;71:607–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Peck GE, Miller RW, Morris KR. Influence of ambient moisture on the compaction behavior of microcrystalline cellulose powder undergoing uni-axial compression and roller-compaction: a comparative study using near-infrared spectroscopy. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:2301–2313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachrimanis K, Nikolakakis I, Malamataris S. Tensile strength and disintegration of tableted silicified microcrystalline cellulose: influences of interparticle bonding. J Pharm Sci 2003;92:1489–1501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaude CMD, Guillot M, Gautier J, et al. Effects of true density, compacted mass, compression speed, and punch deformation on the mean yield pressure. J Pharm Sci 1999;88:725–730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaut F, Busignies V, Fouquereau C, et al. Evaluation of a rotary tablet press simulator as a tool for the characterization of compaction properties of pharmaceutical products. J Pharm Sci 2010;99:2874–2885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Guillot MA, Bateman SD, Morris KR. Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression. II. Compaction studies using a compaction simulator and an instrumented tablet press. J Pharm Sci 2004;93:407–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontier C, Champion E, Viana M, et al. Use of cycles of compression to characterize the behaviour of apatitic phosphate powders. J Eur Ceramic Soc 2002;22:1205–1216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller F, Augsburger L. The role of the displacement–time waveform in the determination of Heckel behaviour under dynamic conditions in a compactionsimulator and a fully-instrumented rotary tablet machine. J Pharm Pharmacol 1994;46:468–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. A critical evaluation of the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm 1999;193:63–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. Impact of particle density and initial volume on mathematical compression models. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;11:307–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konkel P, Mielck JB. Associations of parameters characterizing the time course of the tableting process on a reciprocating and on a rotary tableting machine for high-speed production. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1997;44:289–301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryskevitch E. Discussion of ball milling of pure ceramics diborides. J Am Ceram Soc 1953;36:65–68
   Google Scholar
• Tye CK, Sun CC, Amidon GE. Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:465–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar