The influence of polyamide 6,10 synthesis variables on the physicochemical characteristics and drug release kinetics from a monolithic tablet matrix

References

• Colombo P, Bettini R, Santi P, Peppas NA. Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: Gel-layer behaviour, mechanisms and optimal performance. PSST 2000;3:198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelson CT. Advances in drug delivery systems. Nanotechnology 2001;4:49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sun P, Henry LL, Sun B. Mechanisms of structure and performance controlled thin film composite membrane formation via interfacial polymerization process. J Memb Sci 2005;251:67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gravier D, Lomas AW, Matisons JG, Provatas A. Preparation of polyorganosiloxanes by interfacial polymerization. US Patent No. 5637668; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kolawole OA, Pillay V, Choonara YE. Novel polyamide 6,10 variants synthesized by modified interfacial polymerization for application as a rate-modulated monolithic drug delivery system. J Bioact Compat Polym 2007;22:281–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaymans RJ, Sikkema DJ. Comprehensive polymer science. Vol. 5. New York: SG Allen; 1999:357–373.
   Google Scholar
• Ostad SN, Gard PR. Cytotoxicity and teratogenicity of chlorhexidine diacetate released from hollow nylon fibres. J Pharm Pharmacol 2000;52:779–784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopf G. Nylon 12 – Huels in comparison to other nylons. West Germany: Chemische Werke Huels AG; 2001:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cui X, Yan D. Preparation, characterization and crystalline transitions of odd-even polyamides 11,12 and 11,10 Eur. Polym J 2005;41:863–870.
   Google Scholar
• Lundborg G, Dahlin L, Dohi D, Kanje, M, Terada N. A new type of bioartificial nerve graft for bridging extended defects in nerves. J Han Surg (British and Eur Vol.) 1997;22B:299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Dolorico AMT, Ramin T, Hung VO, Ronald NG. Short-term and long-term visual and astigmatic results of an opposing 10-0 nylon double running suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:991–999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MJ, Patricia AD, Laurie AC. Aesthetic and predictable correction of the inverted nipple. Aesthet Surg J 2003;23:353–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M, Naumann GOH. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2162–2167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai SY, Becker DG. 2004. Sutures and needles. Accessed 26 June 2007 from the website: http://www.emedicine.com/ent/ topic38.htm WebMD pp 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Huang SJ. Comprehensive polymer science. Vol. 6, New York: SG Allen; 1999:597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Madan PL, Chareonboonsit P. Nylon microcapsules. II. Effects of selected variables on theophylline release. Pharm Res 1989;6:714–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres D, Seijo B, García-Encina G, Alonso M, Vilajato JL. Microencapsulation of ion-exchange resins by interfacial nylon polymerization. Int J Pharm 1990;59:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chu L, Liang Y, Chen W, Ju X, Wang H. Preparation of glucose-sensitive microcapsules with a porous membrane and functional gates. Coll Surf B: Biointerf 2004;37:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas SP, Sood A, Venugopalan P, Venkatesan N. Preparation and characterization of microencapsulated gelospheres for controlled oral theophylline delivery. J Microencap 2000;17:767–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. In vitro release modulation of cross-linked pellets for site-specific drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract I. Comparison of pH-responsive drug release and associated kinetics. J Control Release 1999;59:229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. In vitro release modulation of cross-linked pellets for site-specific drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract II. Physicochemical characterization of calcium-alginate, calcium-pectinate and calcium-alginate-pectinate pellets. J Control Release 1999;59:243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender S, Pillay V, Chetty DJ, Essack SY, Dangor CM, Govender T. Optimization and characterization of bioadhesive controlled release tetracycline microspheres. Int J Pharm 2005;306:24–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibambo SR, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Penny C. A novel salted-out and subsequently crosslinked poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) polymeric scaffold applied to monolithic drug delivery. J Bioact Compat Polym 2008;23:132–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Liu Z, Yan D. Synthesis and characterization of novel even-odd nylons based on undecanoic acid. Eur Poly J 2004;40:1111–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharmaceutical Codex. Principles and practice of pharmaceutics. Walter L, editor. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 1994:157.
   Google Scholar
• Göpferich A. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials 1996;17:103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Shah JC, Hwang SS. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of OROS® and immediate release amitryptiline. J Clin Pharmacol 1999;48:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Benstead N, Theobald GW. Iron and the physiological anemia of pregnancy. BMJ 1952;407–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haler D. The therapeutic response of secondary anemias to organic and inorganic iron salts. BMJ 1952;2341–2343.
   Google Scholar
• Park LC, Lipman RS. A comparison of patient dosage deviation reports with pill counts. Psychopharmacologica 1964;6:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes CM, Brown GW, Monck EM. The general practitioner and the schizophrenic patient. BMJ 1962;972–976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter AMW. Drug defaulting in a general practice. BMJ 1969;218–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon WM, Stradling P, Wootton IDP., Out-patient P.A.S. therapy. Lancet 1957;871–872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willcox DRC, Gillan R, Hare EH. Do psychiatric out-patients take their drugs? BMJ 1965;790–792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta SK, Shah J, Hwang S. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of OROS® and immediate-release amitriptyline. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis SS, Illum L, Hinchcliffe M. Gastrointestinal transit of dosage forms in the pig. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;33–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz-Angel MJ, Carda-Broch S, Simo-Alfonso EF, Garcia MC. Optimized procedures for the reversed phase liquid chromatographic analysis of formulations containing tricyclic antidepressants. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 2003;32:71–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Gopferich A. Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;48:229–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. In situ electrolyte interactions in a disc-compressed system for up-curving and constant drug delivery. J Control Release 2000;67:55–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. A novel approach for constant rate delivery of highly soluble bioactives from a simple monolithic system. J Control Release 2000;67:67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas A, Baykara T. Studies on indomethacin inserts prepared by water-soluble polymers – II. The relation between dissolution rate and swelling behaviour. Il Farmaco 2001;56:197–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narasimhan B. Mathematical models describing polymer dissolution: consequences for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;48:195–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Mathematical modeling of controlled drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;48:137–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliecker G, Schmidt C, Fuchs S, Ehinger A, Sandow J, Kissel T. In vitro and in vivo correlation of buserelin release from biodegradable implants using statistical moment analysis. J Control Release 2004;94:25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamzad S, Tutunji L, Fassihi R. Analysis of macromolecular changes and drug release from hydrophilic matrix systems. Int J Pharm 2005;292:75–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibanda W, Pillay S, Danckwerts MP, Viljoen AM, Vuuren S, Khan RA. Experimental design for the formulation and optimization of novel cross-linked oilispheres developed for in vitro site-specific release of Mentha piperita oil. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2004;5:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy NS. Hydrogen bonding, mobility and structural transitions in aliphatic polyamides. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 2006;44:1763–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. Evaluation and comparison of dissolution data derived from different modified release dosage forms: An alternative method. J Control Release 1998;55:45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuksal A, Tiwary AK, Jain NK, Jain S. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of extended release matrix tablet of zidovudine: influence of combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix formers AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari M, Kazemipour M, Talebnia J. The development and validation of a dissolution method for clomipramine solid dosage forms. Dissol Technol 2004;Aug ed. 16–24.
   Google Scholar