Comparative study of pharmaceutical properties of some new derivatives of sulfamethoxazole

References

• Brown AG, Roberts SM. Recent advances in the chemistry of β-lactum antibiotics. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ma M, Cheng Y, Xu Z, Xu P, Qu H, Fang Y, Xu T, Wen L. Evaluation of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers as drug carriers of anti-bacterial drugs using sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) as a model drug. Eur J Med Chem 2007;42(1):93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun-Pascaud M, Bertrand G, Chau F, Rajagopalan-Levasseur P, Garry L, Derouin F, Girard PM. Rat model of concurrent Pneumocystis carinii (Pc), Toxoplasma gondii (Tg), and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections for assessment of multiple prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42(5):1068–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Sheela CD, Gomathi A, Ravichandran S, Tharmaraj P. Studies on Schiff base complexes of salicylaldehyde with sulphamethoxazole and their antimicrobial activities. Polish J Chem 2006;80:1781–1787.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal MS, Khan AH, Loothar BA, Bukhari IH. Effect of derivatization of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim with copper and zinc on their medicinal value. Med Chem Res 2009;18:31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XL, Liu J, Yang L, Zha X-Y. Synthesis, characterization, and susceptibility of bacteria of selenium dioxide complexes with sulfa drugs. Synth React Inorg Metal-Org Nano-Metal Chem 2005;35(10):761–766.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal MS, Bukhari IH, Arif M. Preparation, characterization and biological evaluation of copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes with Schiff bases derived from amoxicillin and cephalexin. Appl Organometal Chem 2005;19:864–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudry DB, Dormond A, Durisa F, Bernard JM, Desmurs JR. Lanthanide bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amides, synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity. J Fluorine Chem 2003;121(2):233–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhamafe AO, Azubuike CPC. Direct compression studies on low-cost cellulose derived from maize cobs. J Pharm Biores 2004;1:26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Audu-Peter JD, Ojile JE, Bhatia PG. Physiochemical and powder properties of alpha and microcrystalline-cellulose derived from maize cob. J Pharm Biores 2004;1:41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ohwoavworhua FO, Ogah EO, Kunle OO. Preliminary investigation of physicochemical and functional properties of alpha cellulose obtained from waste paper–a potential pharmaceutical excipient. J Raw Matr Res 2005;2:84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Carr RL. Classifying flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 1965;72:69–72.
   Google Scholar
• United States Pharmacopoeia. 30th ed; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powders. Int J Powder Metall 1967;3:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Krycer I, Pope DG, Hersey JA. An evaluation of the techniques employed to investigate powder compaction behavior. Int J Pharm 1982;12:113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metallurg Soc AIME 1961;221:1001–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg M, Moreyra MR. Effect of moisture on the stress relaxation pattern of compacted powders. Powder Technol 1997;277–279.
   Google Scholar
• Augsburger LL, Hoag SW, editors. Pharmaceutical dosage forms. Vol. 2. Rational design and formulation. 3rd ed. London: Informa; 2008:567.
   Google Scholar
• Obiorah BA, Shotton E. The effects of waxes, hydrolyzed gelatin and moisture on the compression characteristics of paracetamol and phenacetin. J Pharm Pharmacol 1976;28:629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees JE, Hersey. The strength of compacts containing moisture. Pharm Acta Helv 1972;47:235–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augsburger LL, Hoag SW, editors. Pharmaceutical dosage forms. Vol. 2. Rational design and formulation. 3rd ed. London: Informa; 2008:73.
   Google Scholar
• Augsburger LL, Hoag SW, editors, Pharmaceutical dosage forms. Vol. 2. Rational design and formulation. 3rd ed. Lodnon: Informa; 2008:562.
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Bustamante P, Chun AHC. Physical pharmacy. 4th ed. Baltimore, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002;4:442–446.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann BS. Advances in pharmaceutical sciences. Vol. 2. Bean SH, Careless JE, Beckett AH, editors. New York: Academic Press; 1967:181.
   Google Scholar
• Pilpil N. Advances in pharmaceutical sciences. Vol. 3. Bean SH, Careless JE, Beckett AH, editors. New York: Academic Press; 1971:173–219.
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth JN. Powder flow. In: Aulton ME, editor. Pharmaceutics – the science of dosage form design. 2nd ed. Spain: Churchill Livingston; 2002(2):205–207.
   Google Scholar
• Paronen P, Lilla J. Porosity-pressure functions. In: Alderborn G, Nystron C, editors. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1996:55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G, Nystron C. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. Vol. 71. In: Swarbrick J, editor. Drugs and pharmaceutical sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Podezek F, Revesz P. Evaluation of the properties of microcrystalline and microfine cellulose powders. Int J Pharm 1993;91:183–193.
   Google Scholar