Predicting changes in blood flow in patient-specific operative plans for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease

References

• Rutherford R B. Vascular surgical procedures. R B Rutherford. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Draney M T, Ku J P, Parker D, Steele B N, Wang K, Zarins C K. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4: 231–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson N M. Geometric algorithms and software architecture for computational prototyping: applications in vascular surgery and MEMS. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA December, 2002, PhD Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Wilson N M, Wang K, Dutton R W, Taylor C A (2001) A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. Proceedings of the 4th International conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001), UtrechtThe Netherlands, October, 2001, W Niessen, M Viergever. Springer;, Berlin, 449–456, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2208
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C A. A computational framework for investigating hemodynamic factors in vascular adaptation and disease. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA August, 1996, PhD Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Wilson N M, Arko F R, Taylor C A (2004) Patient-specific operative planning for aortofemoral reconstruction procedures. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004), St. MaloFrance, October, 2004, C Barillot, D R Haynor, P Hellier. Springer;, Berlin, 422–429, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3217
   Google Scholar
• Wilson N M, Arko F R, Zarins C K, Olcott C, Taylor C A. Preoperative computational modeling of aortofemoral reconstructions to predict postoperative hemodynamic results. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Symposium on Vascular Surgery, Rancho Mirage, CA, 10–13 March, 2004, 110
   Google Scholar
• Wilson N M, Arko F R, Taylor C A. An integrated software system for preoperatively evaluating aortofemoral reconstruction procedures. Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference, Miami, FL, 25–29 June, 2003, 899–900
   Google Scholar
• Draney M T, Alley M T, Tang B T, Wilson N M, Herfkens R J, Taylor C A. Importance of 3D nonlinear gradient corrections for quantitative analysis of 3D MR angiographic data. Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Tenth Scientific Meeting & Exhibition (ISMRM 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii, 18–24 May, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ku J P, Draney M T, Arko F R, Lee W A, Chan F P, Pelc N J, Zarins C K, Taylor C A. In vivo validation of numerical predication of blood flow in arterial bypass grafts. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30: 743–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele B N, Wan J, Ku J P, Hughes T J.R, Taylor C A. In vivo validation of a one-dimensional finite element method for simulation-based medical planning for cardiovascular bypass surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50: 649–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku J P, Elkins C J, Taylor C A. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro larger artery bypass graft model. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33(3)257–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik D S, Beaulieu C F, Jeffrey R B, Rubin G D, Napel S. Automated flight path planning for virtual endoscopy. Med Phys 1998; 25: 629–637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen W. The Visualization Toolkit. Prentice-Hall;, New Jersey 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wang K. Level set methods for computational prototyping with application to hemodynamic modeling. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA August, 2001, PhD Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Osher S, Sethian J A. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 1988; 79: 12–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malladi R, Kimmel R, Adalsteinsson D, Sapiro G, Caselles V, Sethian J A. A geometric approach to segmentation and analysis of 3D medical images. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, San Francisco, CA, June, 1996, 244–252
   Google Scholar
• Sethian J A. Level set methods and fast marching methods. Cambrige University Press;, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• Parasolid reference manual, EDS, Inc., Plano, TX, USA
   Google Scholar
• Davidovic L B, Lotina S I, Kostic D M, Cinara I I, Cvetkovic S D, Stojanovic P L, Velimirovic L B, Markovic D M, Pejkic S L, Pavlovic G. Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene aortobifemoral grafts. Srp Arh Celok Lek 1997; 125(3–4)75–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devine C, McCollum C. Heparin-bonded dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoralpopliteal bypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33(3)533–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhariev T, Grozdinski L, Stankev M, Chirkov A. A comparative assessment of the results of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses in arterial reconstructions of the aortoiliac segment. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 1995; 48(1)37–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• den Hoed P T, Veen H F. The late complications of aortoilio-femoral Dacron prostheses: dilatation and anastomotic aneurysm formation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992; 6(3)282–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Akker P J, Brand R, van Schilfgaarde R, van Bockel J H, Terpstra J L. False aneurysms after prosthetic reconstructions for aortoiliac obstructive disease. Ann Surg 1989; 210(5)658–666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris P, How T. Haemodynamics of cuffed arterial anastomoses. Int J Vasc Med 1999; 9(1)20–26
   Google Scholar
• Sieswerda C, Skotnicki S H, Barentsz J O, Heystraten F M. Anastomotic aneurysms—an underdiagnosed complication after aortoiliac reconstructions. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989; 3(3)233–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swartbol P, Albrechtsson U, Parsson H, Norgren L. Dialation of aortobifemoral knitted Dacron grafts after a mean implantation of 5 years. Int Angiol 1996; 15(3)236–239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florez-Valencia L, Montagnat J, Orkisz M (2002) 3D graphical models for vascular-stent pose simulation. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Graphics (ICCVG), Zakopane, Poland, September, 2002, 25–29
   Google Scholar
• Isokangas J M, Hietala R, Perala J, Tervonen O. Accuracy of computer-aided measurements in endovascular stent-graft planning. Invest Radiol 2003; 38(3)164–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C, Cochelin B. Mechanical behaviour modelling of balloon-expandable stents. J Biomech 2000; 33: 1461–1470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenegrachts K, Rigauts H, Letter J D. Prediction of aortoiliac stent graft length: comparison of a semiautomated computed tomography angiography method and calibrated aortography. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2003; 22(2)284–288
   Google Scholar
• Auricchio F, Loreto M D, Sacco E. Finite-element analysis of a stenotic artery revascularization through a stent insertion. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2001; 4: 249–263
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel G A, Schulze-Bauer CAJ, Stadler M. Mechanics of angioplasty: wall, balloon and stent. Proceedings in Mechanics in Biology, J Casey, G Bao. New York 2000; AMD-Vol. 242, BED-Vol. 46: 141–156
   Google Scholar
• Pelc N J, Herkens R J, Shimakawa A, Enzmann D R. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Quart 1991; 7(4)229–254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelc N J, Sommer F G, Li KCP, Brosnan T J, Herfkens R J, Enzmann D R. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magn Reson Quart 1994; 10(3)125–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figueroa C A, Jansen K C, Hughes TJR, Taylor C A. A coupled momentum method to model blood flow in deformable arteries. Proceedings Sixth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, BeijingChina, 5–10 September, 2004, Paper n. o. 635 on CDROM
   Google Scholar
• Womersley J R. Oscillatory motion of a viscous fluid in a thin-walled elastic tube—I: the linear approximation for long waves. Phil Mag 1955; 7: 199–221
   Google Scholar
• Wan J, Steele B, Spicer S A, Strohband S, Feijoo G R, Hughes TJR, Taylor C A. A one-dimensional finite element method for simulation-based medical planning for cardiovascular disease. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2002; 5(3)195–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steele B N. A simulation-based medical planning system for occlusive cardiovascular disease using one dimensional analysis techniques. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA August, 2003, PhD dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Vignon I E, Taylor C A. Outflow boundary conditions for one-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Wave Motion 2004; 39: 361–374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele B N, Taylor C A. Simulation of blood flow in the abdominal aorta at rest and during exercise using a 1-D finite element method with impedance boundary conditions derived from a fractal tree. In:. Proceedings of ASME Summer Bioengineering Meeting, Key Biscayne, FL, June, 2003, 813–814
   Google Scholar
• Müller J, Nagrath S, Li X, Jansen K E, Shephard M S. Efficient computational methods for the investigation of cardiovascular disease. Proceedings of the US National Congress on Computational Mechanics (USNCCM7), Albuquerque, NM, July, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Hughes TJR, Zarins C K. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1998; 158: 155–196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Hughes TJR, Zarins C K. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng 1998; 26: 975–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Hughes TJR, Zarins C K. Effect of exercise on hemodynamic conditions in the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29(6)1077–1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignon I E, Figueroa C A, Jansen K E, Taylor C A. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng, in press
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Hughes TJR. A multiscale finite element method for blood flow in deformable vessels. Proceedings of the 1998 World Congress of Biomechanics. SapporoJapan 1998
   Google Scholar
• Shim E B, Kamm R D, Heldt T, Mark R G. Numerical analysis of blood flow through a stenosed artery using a coupled multiscale simulation method. Comp Cardiol 2000; 27: 219–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laganà K, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Pietrabissa R, Pennati G, Veneziani A, Quarteroni A. Multiscale modelling as a tool to prescribe realistic boundary conditions for the study of surgical procedures. Biorheology 2002; 39(3–4)359–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formaggia L, Gerbeau J F, Nobile F, Quartoni A. Numerical treatment of defective boundary conditions for the Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 2002; 40(1)376–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formaggia L, Gerbeau J F, Nobile F, Quartoni A. On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier–Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 2001; 191: 561–582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franca L P, Frey S L. Stabilized finite element methods i. i. The incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1992; 99(2–3)209–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen K E, Whiting C H, Hulbert G M. Generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000; 190(3–4)305–319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting C H, Jansen K E. A stabilized finite element method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using a hierarchical basis. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2001; 35: 93–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks A N, Hughes TJR. Streamline upwind Petrov–Galerkin formulation for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1981; 32: 199–259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karypis G, Kumar V. Multilevel algorithms for multi-constraint graph partitioning. University of Minnesota. Department of Computer Science/Army HPC Research Center, Minneapolis, Technical Report no. 98—019
   Google Scholar
• Cheng C P, Parker D, Taylor C A. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine PC-MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30(8)1020–1032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C A, Cheng C P, Espinosa L A, Tang B T, Parker D, Herfkens R J. In vivo quantification of blood flow and wall shear stress in the human abdominal aorta during lower limb exercise. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30(3)402–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganong W FM. Review of medical physiology. Englewood Cliffs: Appleton & Lange 1995
   Google Scholar
• Cheng C P, Herfkens R J, Taylor C A. Comparison of abdominal aortic hemodynamics between men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise. J Vasc Surg 2002; 37(1)118–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeley B D, Young D F. Effect of geometry on pressure losses across models of arterial stenoses. J Biomech 1976; 9(7)439–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post P N, Kievit J, van Bockel J H. Optimal follow-up strategies after aortoiliac prosthetic reconstruction: a decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28(3)287–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar