Response actions to difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury

References

• Nygard L, Starkhammar S. The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: Mapping out the difficulties. Aging Ment Health 2007;11:144–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange M, Smith R. Technology and occupation: Contemporary viewpoints. The future of electronic aids to daily living. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:107–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Assistive Technology (AT) versus Mainstream Technology (MST): The research perspective. Tech Disabil 2006;18:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bodine C, Scherer MJ. Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the US Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR): Reports from working groups. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1567–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Lexell J, Larsson Lund M. Perceived difficulties using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: Influence on activity and participation. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:267–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövgren Engström A-L, Lexell J, Larsson Lund M. Difficulties in using everyday technology after an acquired brain injury: A qualitative analysis. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:233–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Compensating for cognitive deficits following brain injury. Neuropsychol Rev 2000;10:233–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman L, Dixon RA. Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychol Bull 1992;112:259–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Watson PC. A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment. Memory 1996;4:465–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirette DK, Hinojosa J, Carnevale GJ. Comparison of remedial and compensatory interventions for adults with acquired brain injuries. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999;14:595–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1596–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Gialloreti LE, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Pratesi L, Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome: The prominent role of neuropsychological disorders. Eur Neurol 1996;36:385–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schretlen DJ, Shapiro AM. A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003;15:341–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone, et al's (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsych 2009;23:20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bernspang B, Fisher AG. Differences between persons with right or left cerebral vascular accident on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:1144–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirette D. The development of awareness and the use of compensatory strategies for cognitive deficits. Brain Inj 2002;16:861–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirette D. A comparison of attention, processing and strategy use by adults with and without acquired brain injuries. Brain Inj 2004;18:1219–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner JK. Conceptualizing the relations between executive functions and self-regulated learning. J Psychol 2009;143:405–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Katz N. Awareness of deficits in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:158–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Clare L. The association between awareness deficits and rehabilitation outcome following acquired brain injury. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:783–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Azulay J. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22:257–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees L, Marshall S, Hartridge C, Mackie D, Weiser M. Cognitive interventions post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2007;21:161–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Evidence-based practice and the limits of rational rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1073–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Moore Sohlberg M, Yorkston K, Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18:257–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti S, Asaba E, Tham K. The lived experience of recapturing self-care. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:303–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G. Occupational gaps after aquired brain injury in everyday life after stroke: An exploration of participation in everyday occupations and the relation to life satisfaction. Medical dissertation, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons L, Stanley M. The lived experience of occupational adaptation following acquired brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J 2008;55:231–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger L. Occupational adaptation: Perspectives in people with traumatic brain injury. J Occup Sci 2005;12:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C, Heard R. Effective occupational therapy intervention with adults demonstrating agitation during post-traumatic amnesia. Brain Inj 2008;22:669–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Keohane C. Cognitive rehabilitation: A goal-planning approach. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2002;17:542–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model. A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz LE, Trainor K. Evaluation of cognitive rehabilitation as a treatment paradigm. Brain Inj 2007;21:545–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008;4:141–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounnded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård L. Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). Opublicerad manual för forskning version 1. [Unpublished manual for research, first version]. Stockholm: Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet (KI); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) – psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of competence in technology use. OTJR: Occup Particip Health 2009;29:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård L. How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:101–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvale S. Den kvalitatva forskningsintervjun [InterViews]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res 2002;12:399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:943–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz LE. Models of exceptional adaptation in recovery after traumatic brain injury: A case series. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22:48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirette DK, Plaisier BR. The development of self-awareness of deficits from 1 week to 1 year after traumatic brain injury: Preliminary findings. Brain Inj 2007;21:1131–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstam L, Uppgard B, Kottorp A, Tham K. Relationship between awareness of disability and occupational performance during the first year after a stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:503–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygard L. Responses of persons with dementia to challenges in daily activities: A synthesis of findings from empirical studies. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58:435–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003;15:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of number in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 2001;24:230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar