An approach to facilitate healthcare professionals' readiness to support technology use in everyday life for persons with dementia

References

• Liu KPY, Chan CCH, Chu MML, Ng TY, Chu LW, Hui FSL, et al. Activities of daily living performance in dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2007;116:91–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzheimer Disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2010. The global economic impact of dementia. Executive summary. London, UK: 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Assistive technology (AT) versus mainstream technology (MST): The research perspective. Technol Disabil 2006;18:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf H, Kaspar R. Elderly people's use and acceptance of information and communication technologies. In Jaeger B, editor. Young technologies in old hands: an international view on senior citizens' utilization of ICT. Copenhagen: DJÖF Publishing; 2005. p 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Starkhammar S. The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: mapping out the difficulties. Aging Ment Health 2007;11:144–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Koushambhi BK, McDonald H, Sermenuik P, Tan E, et al. Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health 2008;31:130–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Kottorp A, Nygård L. Ability to manage everyday technology: A comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:462–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nygård L, Pantzar M, Uppgard B, Kottorp A. Detection of disability in older adults with MCI or Alzheimer's disease through assessment of perceived difficulty in using everyday technology. Aging Ment Health 2012;16:361–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Kottorp A, Winblad B, Nygård L. Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:216–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topo P. Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers: A literature review. J Appl Gerontol 2009;28:5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill S, Macijauskiene J, Nygård A-M, Faulkner JF, Hagen I. Technology in dementia care. Technol Disabil 2007;19:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Molin G, Pettersson C, Jonsson O, Keijer U. Living at home with acquired cognitive impairment: Can assistive technology help? Technol Disabil 2007;19:91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Nygård L. Persons with dementia become users of assistive technology: a study of the process. Dementia 2012;11:135–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Hussey SM. Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Baltimore: Mosby; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003;15:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The matching person and technology model. In Scherer M, editor. Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technologies in disabilities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004. p 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Boman L. New technology and everyday functioning at home for persons with cognitive impairment after required brain injury. Doctoral thesis, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm: 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kent B, Hutchinson AM, Fineout-Overholt E. Getting evidence into practice: Understanding knowledge translation to achieve practice change. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2009;6:183–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Continuing Course in Health Professions 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper B, Low L-F, Withall A, Vickland V, Ward T. Translating dementia research into practice. Int Psychogeratr 2009;21:72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabana D, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud P-AC, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:1458–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J. Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayette, Indiana: Kappa Delta Pi, International Honor Society in Education; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Kreuger RA. Focus group kit, vols 1–6. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Nygård L. Teknik som stöd för personer med demens och deras närstående [Technology as support for PwDs and their significant others]. Stockholm: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Kottorp A, Nygård L. Readiness for technology use with people with dementia: The perspectives of significant others. J Appl Gerontol 2012;31:510–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative methodology for international public health. 2nd ed. Umeå: Print och Media; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, et al. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Comput Human Behav 2010;26:1710–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ala TA, Berck LG, Popovich AM. Using the telephone to call for help and caregiver awareness in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathen T, Vardeberg K. Test–retest reliability of the Sunnaas ADL index. Scand J Occup Ther 2001;8:140–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Jones KB. Assessment of motor and process skills, Vol. 1: Development, standardization, and administration manual. 7th ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson Å. Everyday life amongst the oldest old: Descriptions of doings and possession and use of technology. Dissertation, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, National Institute for the Study of Ageing and Later Life, Division of Health, Activity and Caring. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Starkhammar S. Telephone use among noninstitutionalized PwDs living alone: Mapping out difficulties and response strategies. Scand J Caring Sci 2003;17:239–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Sankaran NN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006;21:333–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein S, Barlow I, Hollis V. Evaluating ADL measures from an occupational therapy perspective. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:69–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: Basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:125–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchinson AM, Johnston L. Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses' opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:304–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar