Occupational therapy with people with depression: Using nominal group technique to collate clinician opinion

References

• Robbins PR. Understanding depression. 2nd ed. Jefferson, NC: McFarland; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Preboth M. Clinical review of recent findings on the awareness, diagnosis and treatment of depression. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:3158–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Punwar AJ, Peloquin S. Occupational therapy: principles and practice. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus M, Yasamy MT, van Ommeren M, Chisholm D, Saxena S. [Internet]. Depression: A global public health concern. [cited 2013 21 Sept] Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/who_paper_depression_wfmh_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hitch D. Experiences of engagement in occupations and assertive outreach services. Br J Occup Ther 2009;72:482–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Taylor M, Pepin G, Stagnitti K. Evidence based guidelines to improve engagement and participation for people experiencing depression. Int J Psychosocial Rehabil 2013;17; online.
   Google Scholar
• Griffo G. Models of disability, ideas of justice, and the challenge of full participation. Mod Italy 2014;19:147–59.
   Google Scholar
• Armon K. Consensus processes. In Bowker R, Lakhanpaul M, Atkinson M, Armon K, MacFaul R, Stephenson T, editors. How to write a guideline from start to finish: a handbook for healthcare professionals. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Thorell L, Wallinder J. Occupational functioning in relation to psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia and mood disorders. Nord J Psychiatry 1998;52:223–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson P. The Delphi technique in doctoral research: considerations and rationale. Rev Higher Educ Self Learning 2013;6:53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rea L, Parker R. Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M. Collating expert opinion using modified nominal group technique [Honours thesis]. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfer LT. Real research: conducting and evaluating research in the social sciences. San Francisco: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey A, Cusick A. Strategies for introducing evidence-based practice and changing clinician behaviour: a manager’s toolbox. Aust Occup Ther J 2002;49:63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. An occupational perspective of health. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmond VA. The point of triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh 2001;33:253–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson C. Real world research. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002;32:959–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (Ho NOS): Research and development. Br J Psychiatry 1998;172:11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: Compendium 2006. Arlington VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Aging [Internet]. Better access to mental health care: Fact sheet for patients. [cited 2013 21 Sept] Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-ba-fact-pat.
   Google Scholar
• Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982–1983;17:37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De las Heras CG, Geist R, Kielhofner G, Li Y. The Volitional Questionnaire (Version 4.1). Chicago: MOHO Clearinghouse; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sudsawad P. A conceptual framework to increase usability of outcome research for evidence-based practice. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir-Gray J, Haynes R, Sackett D, Cook D, Guyatt G. Transferring evidence from research into practice, 3: developing evidence-based clinical policy. Evid Based Med 1997;2:36–8.
   Google Scholar
• Deidentified
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey A. Occupational therapists report a low level of knowledge, skill and involvement in evidence-based practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Leon FG, Ashton AK, D’Mello DA, Dantz B, Hefner J, Matson GA, et al. Depression and comorbid medical illness: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. J Fam Pract 2003;52:S19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Conner KO, Copeland VC, Grote NK, Koeske G, Rosen D, Reynolds CF, et al. Mental health treatment seeking among older adults with depression: the impact of stigma and race. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18:531–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty MC, Beplat AL. The validity of using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure with older adults with and without depressive symptoms. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2008;27:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Waters D. Recovering from a depressive episode using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:278–82.
   Google Scholar
• Chesworth C, Duffy R, Hodnett J, Knight A. Measuring clinical effectiveness in mental health: is the Canadian Occupational Performance an appropriate measure? Br J Occup Ther 2002;65:30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Girard C, Fisher A, Short M, Duran L. Occupational performance differences between psychiatric groups. Scand J Occup Ther 1999;6:119–26.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth K, Deshpande S, Kielhofner G, Henriksson C, Haglund L, Olson L, et al. The Occupational Circumstances Assessment Interview and Rating Scale (OCAIRS) (Version 4.0). Chicago: MOHO Clearinghouse; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar A, Stupans I, Scutter S, King S. Exploring professionalism: the professional values of Australian occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J 2012;59:209–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. N Z J Physiother 2004;32:126–30.
   Google Scholar