A transactional perspective on occupation: a critical reflection

References

• Chapparo C, Ranka J. Theoretical contexts. In: Whiteford G, Wright-St Clair V, editors. Occupation and practice in context. Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Molke D, Laliberte Rudman D, Polatajko H. The promise of occupational science: a developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:269–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickie VA. Are occupations ‘processes too complicated to explain’? What we can learn by trying. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa E. An introduction to occupational science: a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. In: Johnson J, Yerxa E, editors. Occupational science: the foundations for new models of practice. New York: Howarth; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin M, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: a critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2006;13:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. A science of occupation: ancient or modern? J Occup Sci. 2003;10:115–116.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP, Dickie VA. Transactionalism: occupational science and pragmatic attitude. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. p. 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelberg D, Frauwirth S. A complexity science approach to occupation: moving beyond the individual. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich RM. From complexity theory to transactionalism: moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. J Occup Sci. 2008;15:147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo A. A transactional view: occupation as a means to create experiences that matter. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich RM, Callanan Y. Insights about researching discouraged workers. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn PL, Kramer MK. Description and critical reflection of empiric theory. In: Chinn PL, Kramer MK, editors. Integrated knowledge development in nursing. New York: Mosby; 2004. p. 91–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lal S. Prescribing recovery as the new mantra for mental health: does one prescription serve all? Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77:82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker JG, Harris SR. A reflection on motor learning theory in pediatric occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:29–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach A. A critical reflection on the concept of cultural safety. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP. Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J, Bentley AF. Interaction and transaction. J Philos. 1946;43:505–517.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP, Aldrich RM, Bailliard AL, et al. Action theories for occupational science: the contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. J Occup Sci. 2008;15:157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C, Whiteford G. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. p. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison J. An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: an alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, Activity. 2001;72:19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz HA. Improvisational theater and insights into the function of habit in occupation. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP. From society to self (and back) through place: habit in transactional context. OTJR. 2007;27:50S–59S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark FA, Sanders K, Carlson ME, et al. Synthesis of habit theory. Occup Ther J Res. 2007;27:S7–S23.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich RM, Cutchin MP. Dewey’s concepts of embodiment, growth, and occupation: extended bases for a transactional perspective. In: Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Huteson PR. Haidas. Encyclopedia of anthropology. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2012. p. 1127–1135.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama MK, Thomson NA, Macdonald RM. The Kawa model: the power of culturally responsive occupational therapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1125–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holahan L, Ray L, Dickie VA. A transactional perspective on a consulting practice. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Heatwole Shank K, Cutchin MP. Transactional occupations of older women aging-in-place: negotiating change and meaning. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Rudman DL, Mondaca M, et al . Moving beyond ‘aging in place’ to understanding migration and aging: place making and the centrality of occupation. J Occup Sci. 2013;20:108–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyman A, Josephsson S, Isaksson G. A narrative of agency enacted within the everyday occupations of an older Swedish woman. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:459–472.
   Google Scholar
• Horghagen S, Fostvedt B, Alsaker S. Craft activities in groups at meetings places: supporting mental health users’ everyday occupations. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J, Bentley AF. Transactions as known and named. J Philos. 1946;43:533–551.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Johansson K. Where the transactions happen: the unit of analysis when applying a transactional perspective. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. Springer: New York; 2013. p. 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie VA, Cutchin MP. Transactional perspectives on occupation: main points of contribution of this volume. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. Springer: New York; 2013. p. 257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman DL. Critical discourse analysis: adding a political dimension to inquiry. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Shank KH. Mixed methods and pragmatism for research and occupation. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Harper D. Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 2002;17:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman LR, Mandich A, Magalnaes L, et al. How do we ‘see’ occupations? An examination of visual research methodologies in the study of human occupation. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:292–305.
   Google Scholar
• Chang E. Drug use as an occupation: reflecting on insite, Vancouver’s supervised injection site. Occup Ther Now. 2014;10:21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot ML. Figured world of eating disorders: occupations of illness. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twinley R. The dark side of occupation: a concept for consideration. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:301–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiepek N, Magalnaes L. Addictions and impulse-control disorders as occupations: a selected literature review and synthesis. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:254–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank G. The 2010 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: moral commitments and global assemblages. J Occup Sci. 2012;19:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Occupations through the looking glass: reflecting on occupational scientists ontological assumptions. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. p. 54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wagman P. How to contribute occupationally to ecological sustainability: a literature review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Rozario L. Shifting paradigms: the transpersonal dimensions of ecology and occupation. J Occup Sci. 1997;4:112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman DL, Huot S. Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In: Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 51–63.
   Google Scholar