Inter-agency work in Open Dialogue: the significance of listening and authenticity

References

• Billow, R.M. (2010). Models of therapeutic engagement part II: Sincerity and authenticity. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 60, 29–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Brottveit, Å. (2013). Åpne Samtaler - mer enn ord? Nettverksmøter som kommunikative hendelser, kunnskapsproduksjon og sosial strukturering. (PhD thesis, Universitetet i Oslo, Norway)
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, B. (1997). Transdisciplinary approaches to working with families. In B. Carpenter (Ed.), Families in context: emerging trends in family support and early intervention (pp. 150–163). London: David Fulton
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U.H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guregård, S. (2009). Open dialogue across cultures: Establishing a therapeutic relationship with the refugee family (PhD thesis, University of East London, England)
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2002). Fokusgrupper. Denmark: Samfundslitteratur & Roskilde Universitetsforlag
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1, 188–196
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, V. (2009). The Valdres project: A study of perceptions and experiences with network meetings, including mental health clients, social network members and professional staff members. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
   Google Scholar
• Holmesland, A.-L., Seikkula, J., Nilsen, Ø., Hopfenbeck, M., & Arnkil, T.E. (2010). Open Dialogues in social netwoks: professional identity and transdisciplinary collaboration. International Journal of Integrated Care, 10, 1–14
   Google Scholar
• Holmesland, A.-L., Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T.E. (forthcoming). Transdisciplinary collaboration and role release in Open Dialogue with adolescents' social network. Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Horwath J., & Morrison, T., (2007). Collaboration, integration and change in children's services: Critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 55–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelvoll, J.K. (2008). The multistage focus group interview. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sykepleieforskning, 10, 3–14
   Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Qualitative Social Research, 7, 1–30
   Google Scholar
• McGonigel, M.J., Woodruff, G., & Roszmann-Millican, M. (1994). The transdisciplinary team. A model for family-centered early intervention. In L.J. Johnson, R.J. Gallagher, M.J. LaMontagne, J.B. Jordan, J.J. Gallagher, P.L. Hutinger, & M.B. Karnes (Eds.), Meeting early intervention challenges. Issues from birth to three (pp. 95–131). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing
   Google Scholar
• McLean, S. (2012). Barriers to collaboration on behalf of children with challenging behaviours: a large qualitative study of five constituent groups. Child & Family Social Work, 17, 478–486
   Google Scholar
• Ødegård, A. (2005). Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in relation to children with mental health problems. A pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19:347–357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piippo, J., & Aaltonen, J. (2008a). Mental health and creating safety: The participation of relatives in psychiatric treatment and its significance. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2003–2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piippo, J., & Aaltonen, J. (2008b). Mental health care: Trust and mistrust in different caring contexts. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 2867–2874
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S., & Zwarenstein M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J. (2000). Åpne Samtaler. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J. (2008). Inner and outer voices in the present moment of family and network therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 478–491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J. (2011). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 32:179–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J., Aaltonen, J., Alakare, B., Haarakangas, K., Keränen, J., & Lehtinen, K. (2006). Five-year experience of first-episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: Treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychotherapy Research, 16 214–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2011). The comprehensive Open-Dialogue approach in western Lapland: II. Long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis, 3, 192–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, K.D. (2010). Innovating mental health care (PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark)
   Google Scholar
• Thylefors, I. (2012). Does time matter? Exploring the relationship between interdependent teamwork and time allocation in Swedish interprofessional teams. Journal of Interprofesssional Care, 26, 269–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thylefors, I., Persson, O., & Hellström, D. (2005). Team types, perceived efficiency and team climate in Swedisch cross-professional teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 102–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thylstrup, B. (2009). Dual diagnosis and treatment relations (PhD thesis, Copenhagen University, Denmark)
   Google Scholar
• Willumsen, E. (Ed.). (2009). Tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid i praksis og utdanning i helse- og sosial sektoren. In Tverrprofesjonelt samarbeid i praksis og utdanning (pp. 16–32). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods. London: Sage
   Google Scholar