References
- Argyris, C., Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.
- Corwin, R. G. (1981). Patterns of organizational control and teacher militancy: Theoretical continuities in the idea of loose coupling. In A. C. Kerckhoff (Ed.), Research in the sociology of education and socialization ( pp. 263–293). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 116–131.
- Gamoran, A., Dreeben, R. (1986). Coupling and control in educational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 612–632.
- Glassman, R. B. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18, 83–98.
- Gundlach, M., Zivnuska, S., Stoner, J. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism-collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603–1632.
- Hislop, D. (2005). Knowledge management in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Koff, N. A., Defriese, A. M., Witzke, D. B. (1994). Loosely coupled systems as a conceptual framework for interdisciplinary training. Educational Gerontology, 20, 1–14.
- Kvale, S. (1996). An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Law, J., Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.
- Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Nieman, A. (2002). Boundary negotiations in popular culture: ‘Intermediate dependent entities’ and the ideological context of science policy. Unpublished Preprint. Bath Spa University College.
- Schuhmann, R. (2005). The enterprise of public administration: Scholarship as a loosely coupled system. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 9(4), 45–67.
- Shaw, M., Heyman, B., Reynolds, L., Davies, J., Godun, P. (2007). Multidisciplinary teamwork in a UK regional secure mental health unit a matter for negotiation. Social Theory & Health, 5, 356–377.
- Sjøvold, E. (2006). Teamet - utvikling, effektivitet og endring i grupper. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Star, S. L., Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Timmermans, S., Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard – the challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Tjora, A. (2006). Writing small discoveries: An exploration of fresh observers' observations. Qualitative Research, 6(4), 429–451.
- Weick, K. E. (2001a). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization ( pp. 380–404). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- Weick, K. E. (2001b). Sources of order in underorganized systems: Themes in recent organizational theory. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization ( pp. 33–56). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.