References
- Speert H. Obstetrics and gynecology. A history and iconography. New York, London: The Parthenon Publishing Group, 2004:441–454.
- Baker SA, Connell E, Corderoy EC. Vaginal contraceptives, A time for reappraisal? Population Reports, Series H, No. 3. Washington, DC: Department of Medical and Public Affairs, The George Washington University Medical Center, January 1975.
- Sherris JD, Moore SH, Fox G. New developments in vaginal contraception. Population Reports, Series H, No. 7. Baltimore: Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins University, January–February 1984.
- Dalsimer IA, Piotrow PT, Dumm JJ. Condom – an old method meets a new social need. Population Reports, Series H, No. 1. Washington, DC: Department of Medical and Public Affairs, The George Washington University Medical Center, January 1973.
- Sherris JD, Lewison D, Fox G. Upgrade on condoms – Products, protection, promotion. Population Reports, Series H, No. 6. Baltimore: Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins University, September–October 1982.
- Wortman J. The diaphragm and other intravaginal barriers – A review. Population Reports, Series H, No. 4. Department of Medical and Public affairs, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, January 1976.
- Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al Contraceptive technology, 16th revised edn. New York: Irvington Publishers Inc., 1994:191–221.
- Gardner R, Blackburn RD, Upadhyay UD. Closing the condom gap. Population Reports, Series H, No. 9. Baltimore: Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins University, April 1999.
- Cleland J. Contraception in historical and global perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:165–176.
- World contraceptive use 2007. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2007/contraceptive2007.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, et al Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982‐2002. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics CDC No 350. 10 December 2004.
- Lader D, Contraception and sexual health 2008/2009. A report on research using the National Statistics. Opinions Survey produced on behalf of the NHS Information Centre for health and social care. Office for National Statistics. Opinions Survey Report No. 41. ISSN 978 1 85774 6907. www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/Product.asp?vlnk=6988 (Accessed January 2010).
- Schweizer Bundesamt für Statistik BFS. Mikrozensus Familie 1994/95. (1998) http://www.svss-uspda.ch/de/facts/verhuetung.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Schweizer Bundesamt für Statistik. BFS, Gesundheitsbefragung 2007. (2008) http://www.svss-uspda.ch/de/facts/verhuetung.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Gesellschaft für Sozialforschung und statistische Analysen mbH, Berlin und Dortmund für: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Verhütungsverhalten Erwachsener 2003. Notfall-verhuetung (Contraceptive behaviour of adults, 2003). http://www.notfall-verhuetung.info/info/verhuetung_2003.htm (Accesssed January 2010).
- Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, eds. Contraceptive technology, 18th revised edn. New York: Ardent Media 2004:871.
- Moreau C, Trussell J, Rodriguez G, et al Contraceptive failure rates in France: Results from a population-based survey. Human Reprod 2007;22:2422–2427.
- WHO. Effectiveness of male latex condoms in protecting against pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Fact sheet No. 243, June 2000. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs243/en/print.html (Accessed December 2009).
- Nelson A, Bernstein GS, Frezieres R, et al Study of the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a non-latex (polyurethane) male condom; revised final report (N01-HD-1-3109). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 1997.
- Steiner MJ, Dominik R, Rountree RW, et al Contraceptive effectiveness of a polyurethane condom and a latex condom: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:539–547.
- Glass R, Vessey M, Wiggins P. Use effectiveness of the condom in a selected family planning clinic population in the United Kingdom. Contraception 1974;10:591–598.
- Vaughan B, Trussell J, Menken J, et al Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States 1970‐1973. Fam Plann Perspect 1977;9:251–258.
- Schirm AL, Trussell J, Menken J, et al Contraceptive failure in the United States. The impact of social, economic and demographic factors. Fam Plann Perspect 1982;14:68–75.
- Grady WB, Hayward MD, Yagi J. Contraceptive failure in the United States; estimates from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect 1986;18:200–209.
- Bracher M, Santow G. Premature discontinuation of contraception in Australia. Fam Plann Perspect 1992;24:58–65.
- Jones EF, Forrest JD. Contraceptive failure rates based on the 1988 NSFG. Fam Plann Perspect 1992:24;12–19.
- Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, eds. Contraceptive technology, 19th revised edn. New York: Ardent Media 2007:747–826.
- Lamptey P, Goodridge, G. In: Dallabetta G, Laga M, Lamptey P, eds. Condoms. Control of sexually transmitted diseases. A handbook for the design and management of programs. Section I: Management of STD programs. Durham, NC: The AIDSCAP Electronic Library/Family Health International 1996. http://www.FHI.org/en/HIVAIDS/pub/guide/stdhandbook/chap5.htm (Accessed December 2009).
- Weller SC, Davis-Beaty K. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003255. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003255. Updated 2004 http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003255/frame.html (Accessed December 2009).
- Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull WHO 2004;82:454–461.
- Sanchez J, Campos PE, Courtois B, et al Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in female sex workers: prospective evaluation of condom promotion and strengthened STD services. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2003;30:273–279.
- Wald A, Langenberg AGM, Link K, et al Effect of condoms on reducing the transmission of herpes simplex virus type 2 from men to women. JAMA 2001;285:3100–3106.
- Anonymous. The female condom. AVERT International HIV and AIDS Charity, UK. http://www.avert.org/female-condom.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. Female condoms: A guide for teensCenter for Young Women's Health. Children's Hospital Boston. http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/femalebarrier1.html (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. Technical update on the female condom. Family Health International. Washington, DC, 2001. http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/booksReports/fcupdate.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. The safety and feasibility of female condom reuse: Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization 2002. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/rtis/report_reuse_fc.pdf (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. Diaphragm. Planned Parenthood Federation of America. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/diaphragm-4244.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Tietze C, Lewit S. Comparison of three contraceptive methods: Diaphragms with jelly or cream, vaginal foam, and jelly/cream alone. J Sex Research 1967;3:295–311.
- Hall RE. Continuation and pregnancy rates with four contraceptive methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;116:671–681.
- Bounds W, Guillebaud J. Randomised comparison of the use-effectiveness and patient acceptability of Collatex (Today) contraceptive sponge and the diaphragm Br J Fam Plann 1984;10:69–75.
- Loudon NE, Barden ME, Hepburn WB, et al A comparative study of the effectiveness and acceptability of the diaphragm used with spermicide in the form of C-film or a cream or jelly. Br J Fam Plann 1991;17:41–44.
- Mauck C, Callahan M, Weiner DH, et al A comparative study of the safety and efficacy of FemCap, a new vaginal barrier contraceptive, and the Ortho All-Flex diaphragm. FemCap Investigators'group. Contraception 1999:60;71–80.
- Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003551. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003551. http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003551/frame.html (Accessed January 2010).
- Cook LA, Nanda K, Grimes DA, et al Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD002031. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002031 http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD002031/frame.html (Accessed January 2010).
- Coker AL, Hulka BS, McCann MF, et al Barrier methods of contraception and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Contraception 1992;45:1–10.
- Coker AL, Sander LC, Bond SM, et al Hormonal and barrier methods of contraception, oncogenic human papillomaviruses, and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion development. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001;10:441–449.
- Hatcher RA, Rinehart W, Blackburn R, et al The essentials of contraceptive technology. A handbook for clinic staff. Population Information Program. Baltimore, MD: Center for Communication Programs, The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, 1997.
- Anonymous. Cervical Cap (FemCap). Planned Parenthood Federation of America. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/cervical-cap-20487.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Denniston GC, Putney D. The cavity rim cervical cap. Adv Plann Parent 1981;16:77–80.
- Lehfeldt H, Sivin I. Use effectiveness of the Prentif cervical cap in private practice. A prospective study. Contraception 1984;30:331–338.
- Shihata AA, Trussell J. New female intravaginal barrier contraceptive device: Preliminary contraceptive trial. Contraception 1991;44:11–19.
- Gilmore CE. The development of non-latex condoms. In: McNeill ET, Gilmore CE, Finger WR, et al, eds. The latex condom: Recent advances, future directions. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International, 1998. http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/booksReports/latexcondom/nonlatexcon.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, et al Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003550. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.pub2. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003550/abstract.html (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. Today sponge. http://www.todaysponge.com/images/pdf/sponge-facts.pdf (Accessed January 2010).
- Anonymous. Birth control sponge (Today sponge). Planned Parenthood Federation of America. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-sponge-today-sponge-4224.htm (Accessed January 2010).
- Serfaty D. The contraceptive sponge. (Article in French) Entret Bichat Pitie Salpetriere Ther 1982;225–228.
- Anonymous. Are You Spongeworthy? http://thewelltimedperiod.blogspot.com/2005/04/are-you-spongeworthy.html (Accessed February 2010).
- Creatsas G, Guerrero E, Guilbert E, et al A multinational evaluation of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of the Protectaid contraceptive sponge. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001;3:172–182.
- Female Condom Technical Review Committee. Summary report on FC2. Geneva: World Health Organization 2007: WHO/RHR/07.19. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2007/WHO_RHR_07.19_eng.pdf (Accessed January 2010).
- Batár I. State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: II. Chemical barrier contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010;15:89–95
- Anonymous. Comparing effectiveness of birth control methods. Planned Parenthood Federation of America http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-effectiveness-chart-22710.htm (Accessed January 2010).