Young women's attitudes towards, and experiences of, long-acting reversible contraceptives

REFERENCES

• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Long acting reversible contraceptives – The effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. London: RCOG Press 2005. Accessed 19 November 2012 from: http://publications.nice.org.uk/long-acting-reversible-contraception-cg30
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart L, Newton VL, Dickson J.“I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn't work”: explaining young women's contraceptive implant removal. Contraception 2013;88:636–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg E, Bateson D, McGeechan K, Mohapatra L. A three-year comparative study of continuation rates, bleeding patterns and satisfaction in Australian women using a subdermal contraceptive implant or progestogen releasing-intrauterine system. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2014;19:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 4th edn. Geneva: WHO 2010.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE implementation update report: Long-acting reversible contraception (CG30) – The effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. NICE 2014. Accessed 30 March 2014 from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG30
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Contraception and sexual health: England, 2011/12. Accessed 13 April 2013 from: https://catalogue.ic.nhs.uk/publications/public-health/contraception/nhs-cont-serv-comm-cont-clin-eng-2011–2012/nhs-cont-serv-comm-cont-clin-eng-11-12-rep.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Fact sheet – Contraceptive use in the United States. Accessed 1 October 2013 from: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Dude AM, Neustadt A, Gilliam ML. Correlates of use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among adolescent and young adult women. Contraception 2010;81:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Scorer J, Bigrigg A. Attitudes of women in Scotland to contraception: A qualitative study to explore the acceptability of long-acting methods. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:213–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hladky KJ, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies EL, Askelson NM, Gelman E, Losch M. Young women's knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Womens Health Issues 2010;20:394–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Terplan M, Gold MA, et al. Effect of a brief educational intervention on the attitudes of young women toward the intrauterine device. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010;23:116–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj P, Akintomide H, Brima N, et al. Determinants of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use by adolescent girls and young women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012;17:298–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, et al. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011;84:493–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustanski B. Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. J Sex Res 2001; 38:292–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Johnson LM, Harwood B, et al. Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception 2008;78:211–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanfer K, Wierzbicki S, Payn B. Why are US women not using long-acting contraceptives?Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32:176–83, 191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally A. Contraceptive characteristics: The perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:168–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1417–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg E, Bateson D, Knox S, et al. Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013;18:181–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Rosales C, Cox M. Women's awareness of long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods (LARCs) in community family planning clinics and general practice. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:396–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellings K, Zhihong Z, Krentel A, et al. Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK. Contraception 2007;76:208–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black K, Lotke P, Bhhling KJ, Zite NB. A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012;17:340–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Jensen JT. Fertility after discontinuation of contraception: A comprehensive review of the literature. Contraception 2011;84:465–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman T, Huhtala S, Luoto R, et al. Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:608–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J, Berlan ED. Applying principles from behavioural economics to promote long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46: doi: 10.1363/46e0614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar