Contraceptive use among young women in Estonia: Association with contraceptive services

References

• Laanpere M, Ringmets I, Part K, et al. Abortion trends from 1996 to 2011 in Estonia: Special emphasis on repeat abortion. BMC Women's Health 2014;14:81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissler M, Fronteira I, Jahn A, et al. Terminations of pregnancy in the European Union. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;119:324–32.
   Google Scholar
• Part K, Moreau C, Donati S, et al. Teenage pregnancies in the European Union in the context of legislation and youth sexual and reproductive health services. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, et al. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD005215.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc L, Baxter SK, Payne N, et al. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the effectiveness of contraceptive service interventions for young people, delivered in health care settings. Health Educ Res 2012;27:1102–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker D, Koenig MA, Kim YM, et al. The quality of family planning services in the United States: Findings from a literature review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2007;39:206–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paine K, Thorogood M, Wellings K. The impact of the quality of family planning services on safe and effective contraceptive use: A systematic literature review. Hum Fertil 2000;3:186–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Stud Fam Plann 1990;21:61–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand JT, Hardee K, Magnani RJ, Angle A. Access, quality of care and medical barriers in family planning programs. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1995;21:64–9, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Kempers J, Ketting E, Chandra-Mouli V, Raudsepp T. The success factors of scaling-up Estonian sexual and reproductive health youth clinic network – from a grassroots initiative to a national programme 1991–2013. Reprod Health 2015;12:2.
   Google Scholar
• Kivelä J, Ketting E, Baltussen R. Cost analysis of school-based sexuality education programs in six countries. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2013;11:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Part K, Rahu K, Rahu M, Karro H. Factors associated with Estonian adolescents’ sexuality-related knowledge: Findings from the 1994 and 1999 KISS studies. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Estonia. Statistical database: Population. Accessed 9 April 2015 from: http://pub.stat.ee
   Google Scholar
• Laanpere M, Rahu K, Part K, et al. Ethnic differences in factors associated with the use of contraception among 20- to 44-year-old women in Estonia and St. Petersburg, Russia. Contraception 2012;86:132–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Part K, Laanpere M, Rahu K, et al. Estonian women's health: Sexual and reproductive health, health behaviour, attitudes and use of health care services. Survey report. Tartu: University of Tartu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007. Accessed 9 April 2015 from: www.ut.ee/ARNS/Eesti_naise_tervis1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haavio-Mannila E, Kontula O. Seksin trendit meill ja naapureissa. [Trends in sex in Finland and in the neighbouring countries.] (in Finnish). Helsinki: Werner S derstr m OY 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sihvo S, Hemminki E, Koponen P, et al. Raskaudenehk isy ja terveyspalveluiden k ytt . Aiheita 27/1995. [Use of contraception and contraceptive services. Topics 27/1995] (in Finnish). Helsinki: Stakes 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive Health and Fertility Patterns – a comparative approach (REFER). Accessed 9 April 2015 from: www.thl.fi/fi/web/thlfi-en/research-and-expertwork/projects-and-programmes/reproductive-health-and- fertility-patterns-a-comparative-approach-refer-
   Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010;15:4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter D. Adolescent contraception. Endocr Dev 2012;22:287–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosunen E, Sihvo S, Koponen P, Hemminki E. Do young women have specific problems in contraceptive use and counselling? Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1999;83:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüütel K, Trummal A, Salekešin M, Pervilhac C. HIV epidemic in Estonia: Analysis of strategic information: Case study. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe 2011. Accessed 9 April 2015 from: http://ee.euro.who.int/HIV_Epidemic_in_Estonia_ISBN978-92-890-0257-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bratlie M, Aarvold T, Skårn ES, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults – a cross-sectional study of women and general practitioners in Oslo, Norway. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2014;19:194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra-Mouli, McCarraher DR, Phillips SJ, et al. Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: Needs, barriers, and access. Reprod Health 2014;11:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt R, Stephenson J, Mann S. What influences contraceptive behaviour in women who experience unintended pregnancy? A systematic review of qualitative research. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;34:693–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education. An evidence-informed approach for schools, teachers and health educators. Paris: UNESCO 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby D, Laris BA, Rolleri LA. Sex and HIV education programs for youth: Their impact and important characteristics. Washington, DC: Family Health International 2006.
   Google Scholar
• RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: Concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plann 2003;34:227–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig MA, Hossain MB, Whittaker M. The influence of quality of care upon contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 2007;28:278–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar