Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care

References

• Fiala C, Arthur JH. ‘Dishonourable disobedience’ – Why refusal to treat in reproductive health care is not conscientious objection. Woman Psychosom Gynaecol Obstetr [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Oct 13];1:12–23. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213560X14000034.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen P, Lappalainen S, Ristimäki P, et al. Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 13];16:17. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/16/17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics). Resolution on ‘Conscientious Objection’ [Internet]. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia); 2006 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/OurWork/2006%20Resolution%20on%20Conscientious%20Objection.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Minerva F. Conscientious objection in Italy. J Med Ethics. 2015;41:170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens BM. Ethical misconduct by abuse of conscientious objection laws. Med Law 2006;25:513–522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook RJ, Dickens BM. The growing abuse of conscientious objection. Virtual Mentor [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2015 Oct 13];8:337–40. Available from: http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2006/05/oped1-0605.html.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Women’s access to lawful medical care: the problem of unregulated use of conscientious [Internet]. [Draft report: Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee] 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.assembly.coe.int/committeedocs/2010/20100621_aah%202010_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heino A, Gissler M, Apter D, Fiala C. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013;18:231–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard School of Public Health. Sweden: The Abortion Act, Act No. 595/1974, as amended through Act No. 998/2007 [Internet]. n/d [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/abortion/SWEDEN.abo.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstylrelsen. Abortstatistik 2014: Statistics on induced abortion 2014 [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2015/2015-9-4
   Google Scholar
• European Centre for Law & Justice. Object: Complaint concerning the systemic violation of the freedom of conscience of medical staff in Sweden [Internet]. May 23, 2013 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://9afb0ee4c2ca3737b892-e804076442d956681ee1e5a58d07b27b.r59.cf2.rackcdn.com/ECLJ%20Docs/Appeal%20Rapp.%20Spec%20Conscience%20Sweden.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RFSU [Riksförbundet för Sexuell Upplysning; Swedish Association for Sexuality Education]. European Committee of Social Rights Protects Swedish Women’s Rights to Access Reproductive Health Services [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.rfsu.se/sv/Om-RFSU/Press/Pressmeddelanden/2015/CRR-and-RFSU-European-Committee-of-Social-Rights-Protects-Swedish-Womens—Rights-to-Access-Reproductive-Health-Services/.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish anti-abortion midwife sues county. The Local.se [Internet]. 2014 Jul 11 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.thelocal.se/20140711/anti-abortion-nurse-takes-firing-case-to-court.
   Google Scholar
• No discrimination claim for anti-abortion midwife. Radio Sweden [Internet]. 2014 Apr 10 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=5834145.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish court rules midwife must assist with abortions to be employed. Alliance Defending Freedom [Internet]. 2015 Nov 12 [cited 2015 Dec 19]. Available from: http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/9793.
   Google Scholar
• Butts C. Europe’s ‘freedom of conscience’ debate gets U.N. hearing. OneNewsNow.com [Internet]. 2015 Mar 12 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2015/03/12/europes-freedom-of-conscience-debate-gets-un-hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. Finland: Law No. 239 of 24 March 1970 on the interruption of pregnancy, as amended by Law No. 564 of 19 July 1978 and Law No. 572 of 12 July 1985 [Internet]. n/d [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/population/abortion/Finland.abo.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Suomalaisen Lääkäriseuran Duodecimin ja Suomen Gynekologiyhdistyksen asettama työryhmä [Finnish Medical Society and Finnish Gynaecological Association Working Group] Abortion: Current Care guideline [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.kaypahoito.fi/web/kh/suositukset/suositus?id=hoi27050.
   Google Scholar
• Valtavaara M, Teivainen A. Citizens’ initiative calls for right to conscientious objection in health care. Helsinki Times/Helsinki Sanomat [Internet]. 2014 Aug 28 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finland-news/domestic/11797-citizens-initiative-calls-for-right-to-conscientious-objection-in-health-care.html.
   Google Scholar
• Samvetsfrihet hotar rätten till abort [Conscience threatens abortion rights]. Svenska.yle.fi [Internet]. 2015 Jan 19 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://svenska.yle.fi/artikel/2015/01/19/samvetsfrihet-hotar-ratten-till-abort.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsdóttir UB. Fóstureyðingalöggjöf og kvenréttindabarátta ĺslensk fóstureyðingalöggjöf og áhrif kvennabaráttu hérlendis og erlendis á ákvæði laga um fóstureyðingar á ĺslandi. [Abortion legislation and the feminist struggle: Icelandic abortion legislation and women’s influence at home and abroad on abortion laws in Iceland]. Háskóli ĺslands [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: https://unnurbirnakarls.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/ba_ritgerd2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Alþingi [Iceland Parliament]. Lög um ráðgjöf og fræðslu varðandi kynlíf og barneignir og um fóstureyðingar og ófrjósemisaðgerðir. [Laws on counselling and education regarding sexual matters and family planning and on abortion and sterilization] [Internet]. 1975 May 22 [cited 2015 Oct 13]., nr. 25. Available from: http://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/1975025.html.
   Google Scholar
• Óttarsson A. Um fóstureyðingar á Íslandi I [Abortion in Iceland] Deiglan.com [Internet]. 2001 Jun 23 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.deiglan.com/kosningar-2009/index.php?itemid=353.
   Google Scholar
• Björnsdóttir SA. Hver er afstaða kirkjunnar til getnaðarvarna, fóstureyðinga og samkynhneigðra? [What is the attitude of the Church to contraception, abortion and homosexuality?]. Faith and Life [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from at: http://tru.is/svor/2005/04/hver_er_afstada_kirkjunnar_til_getnadarvarna_fostureydinga_og.
   Google Scholar
• Alþingi [Iceland Parliament]. 79. Frumvarp til laga um breytingu á lögum nr. 25 22. maí 1975, um ráðgjöf og fræðslu varðandi kynlíf og barneignir og um fóstureyðingar og ófrjósemisaðgerðir. [79. A bill amending the Law no. 25 May 22, 1975, on guidance and education on sex and childbirth and on abortions and sterilizations.] [Internet]. 1990 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.althingi.is/altext/113/s/0079.html.
   Google Scholar
• Save the Children. The Urban Disadvantage: State of the World’s Mothers 2015 [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 19]. Available from: http://www.savethechildren.org/atf/cf/%7B9def2ebe-10ae-432c-9bd0-df91d2eba74a%7D/SOWM_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. The right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care. [Resolution 1763 (2010) Final version] [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.assembly.coe.int/committeedocs/2010/20100621_aah%202010_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Abortion Opponents Undercut Council of Europe Resolution on Conscientious Objection [Internet]. 2010 Oct 7 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.reproductiverights.org/press-room/abortion-opponents-undercut-council-of-europe-resolution-on-conscientious-objection.
   Google Scholar
• Waterfield B. Irish abortion law key factor in death of Savita Halappanavar, official report finds. The Telegraph [Internet]. 2013 Jun 13 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ireland/10119109/Irish-abortion-law-key-factor-in-death-of-Savita-Halappanavar-official-report-finds.html.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney A. Abortion ban leads to more maternal deaths in Nicaragua. Lancet [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Oct 14];374:677. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2809%2961545-2/fulltext.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. El Salvador: On the brink of death: Violence against women and the abortion ban in El Salvador [Internet]. 2014 Sep 25. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AMR29/003/2014/en/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2015 Oct 13]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44529/1/9789241501118_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries [Internet]. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 13];122. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13552/full.
   Google Scholar