Systems and technologies for objective evaluation of technical skills in laparoscopic surgery

References

• van Hove PD, Tuijthof GJM, Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LPS, Dankelman J. Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg. 2010;97:972–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KE, Bell RL, Duffy AJ. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3219–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie WP. Basic certification in surgery by the American Board of Surgery (ABS). What does it mean? Does it have value? Is it relevant? A personal opinion. Ann Surg. 2004;239:133–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N. Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ. 1999;318:887–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman JG, Schmitz CC. Using objective structured assessment of technical skills to evaluate a basic skills simulation curriculum for first-year surgical residents. J Am Surg. 2009;209:364–70. e2.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:308–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JD, Webber EM, Sidhu RS. A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room. Am J Surg. 2007;193:551–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll PJ, Paisley AM, Paterson-Brown S. Video assessment of basic surgical trainees' operative skills. Am J Surg. 2008;196:265–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata N, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Tanaka C, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, et al. Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:423–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hessel M, Buzink SN, Schoot BC, Jakimowicz JJ. Face and Construct Validity of the SimSurgery SEP VR Simulator for Salpingectomy in Case of Ectopic Pregnancy. J Gynecol Surg. 2012; Epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Egi H, Okajima M, Kawahara T, Yoshimitsu M, Sumitani D, Tokunaga M, et al. Scientific assessment of endoscopic surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:30–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis KL, Wiegmann DA. Construct validation of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:178–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leblanc F, Senagore AJ, Ellis CN, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Neary PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy skills acquisition: augmented reality simulator versus human cadaver training models. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:200–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chmarra MK, Klein S, Winter JCF, Jansen FW, Dankelman J. Objective classification of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1031–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oropesa I, Sánchez-González P, Chmarra MK, Lamata P, Fernández A, Sánchez-Margallo JA, et al. EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on endoscopic video analysis for psychomotor skills assessment. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1029–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Kenmotsu H, Yasunaga T, Konishi K, Ieiri S, et al. Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:771–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dath D, Regehr G, Birch D, Schlachta C, Poulin E, Mamazza J, et al. Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1800–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL, Ottesen B. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale. BJOG. 2008;115:908–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried G. Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199:115–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiliou MC, Ghitulescu GA, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Leffondré K, Sigman HH, et al. The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery: evidence for reliability. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:744–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A. Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1086–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Peralta LF, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Moyano-Cuevas JL, Pagador JB, Enciso-Sanz S, Sánchez-González P, et al. Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5:307–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreuder HW, van Dongen KW, Roeleveld SJ, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:540.e1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Maithel S, Sierra R, Korndorffer J, Neumann P, Dawson S, Callery M, et al. Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:104–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Schijven MP, Dankelman J. Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1406–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okrainec A, Tekian A, Aarts MA, Grantcharov T, Escallon J, Reznick R. Virtual reality training on basic laparoscopic tasks versus virtual reality training of an entire surgical procedure: A randomized controlled trial using real world operations as an outcome. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Association for Surgical Education, Toronto, Canada, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greco E, Escallon J, Grantcharov T, Okrainec A. Do performance measures on the LapMentor VR simulator predict FLS performance? Can J Surg. 2008;51:15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newmark J, Dandolu V, Milner R, Grewal H, Harbison S, Hernandez E. Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:546.e1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan I, Osei-Agymang T, Radu D, Gerdes B, Rothmund M, Fernández ED. Simulation of laparoscopic surgery–Four years' experience at the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Marburg. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120:70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallagher AG, Lederman AB, McGlade K, Satava RM, Smith CD. Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:660–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Black FW, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, et al. Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training. Surgery. 2006;140:252–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Monteny LJ, Dankelman J. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:511–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokollik C, Gross J, Buess G. New model for skills assessment and training progress in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga M, Egi H, Hattori M, Yoshimitsu M, Sumitani D, Kawahara T, et al. Approaching time is important for assessment of endoscopic surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:142–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egi H, Okajima M, Yoshimitsu M, Ikeda S, Miyata Y, Masugami H, et al. Objective assessment of endoscopic surgical skills by analyzing direction-dependent dexterity using the Hiroshima University Endoscopic Surgical Assessment Device (HUESAD). Surg Today. 2008;38:705–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis NK, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. The Performance of Master Surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester. Arch Surg. 2002;137:841–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Pagador JB, Bustos P, Moreno J. A laparoscopic hybrid simulator for skills assessment and augmented reality surgical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011;6:S263–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther S, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. The red DRAGON: a multi-modality system for simulation and training in minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:149–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pagador JB, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Peralta LF, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Moyano-Cuevas JL, Enciso S, et al. Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012;7:305–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydges R, Classen R, Larmer J, Xeroulis G, Dubrowski A. Computer-assisted assessment of one-handed knot tying skills performed within various contexts: a construct validity study. Am J Surg. 2006;192:109–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lievin M, Keeve E. Stereoscopic Augmented Reality System for Computer Assisted Surgery. Proceedings of the Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Congress, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Estebanez B, Jimenez G, Muoz VF, Garcia-Morales I, Bauzano E, Molina J. Minimally invasive surgery maneuver recognition based on surgeon model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis; MO, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Lim J, Kinnaird C, Nagy AG, Panton ON, Hodgson AJ, et al. Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:651–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier-Hein L, Franz A, Meinzer HP, Wolf I. Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles. Proceedings of SPIE, San Jose; CA, USA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ren H, Rank D, Merdes M, Stallkamp J, Kazanzides P. Development of a wireless hybrid navigation system for laparoscopic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:479–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen B, Nistor V, Dutson E, Carman G, Lewis C, Faloutsos P. Support vector machines improve the accuracy of evaluation for the performance of laparoscopic training tasks. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:170–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeger M, Arbter K, Hirzinger G. Motion Tracking for Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery. In Bozovic V, editor. Medical Robotics. InTech, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bouarfa L, Akman O, Schneider A, Jonker PP, Dankelman J. In-vivo real-time tracking of surgical instruments in endoscopic video. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:129–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonet O, Thoranaghatte RU, Megali G, Dario P. Tracking endoscopic instruments without a localizer: a shape-analysis-based approach. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;12:35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XL, Payandeh S. Application of visual tracking for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Syst. 2002;19:315–28.
   Google Scholar
• Doignon C, Nageotte F, Maurin B, Krupa A. Pose estimation and feature tracking for robot assisted surgery with medical imaging. In Kragic D, Kyrki V, editors. Unifying Perspectives in Computational and Robot Vision. Springer, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Voros S, Long JA, Cinquin P. Automatic detection of instruments in laparoscopic images: A first step towards high-level command of robotic endoscopic holders. Int J Rob Res. 2007;26:1173–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speidel S, Delles M, Gutt C, Dillmann R. Tracking of Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Surgical Skill Analysis. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2006;4091:148–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Pagador JB, Gómez EJ, Sánchez-González P, Usón J, et al. Video-based assistance system for training in minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011;20:197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climent J, Hexsel RA. Particle filtering in the Hough space for instrument tracking. Comput Biol Med. 2012;42:614–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oropesa I, Lamata P, Sánchez-González P, Pagador JB, García ME, Sánchez-Margallo FM, et al. Virtual realitysimulators for objective evaluation on laparoscopic surgery: Current trends and benefits. In Kim J, Editor Virtual reality. Intech Open Access Publisher, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg. 2007;31:764–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristancho SM, Hodgson AJ, Panton ON, Meneghetti A, Warnock G, Qayumi K. Intraoperative monitoring of laparoscopic skill development based on quantitative measures. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2181–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dankelman J, Chmarra MK, Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Grimbergen CA. Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14:247–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar