Effects of realistic force feedback in a robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery system

References

• Steiner W, Aurbach G, Ambrosch P. Minimally invasive therapy in otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 1991;1:57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, McLoughlin J, Guthart G, Salisbury J, Walther T, Gummert J, et al. Dexterity enhancement in endoscopic surgery by a computer-controlled mechanical wrist. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 1999;8:235–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V, Kronreif G, Stoianovici D. Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art. Minim InvasTher Allied Technol. 2006;15:101–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detter H, Reichenspurner DH, Boehm B, Reichart C. Robotic manipulators in cardiac surgery: the computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2001;10:275–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horan B, Najdovski Z, Nahavandi S, Tunstel E. editors. 3D virtual haptic cone for intuitive vehicle motion control. 3D User Interfaces, 2008 3DUI 2008 IEEE Symposium on; Reno, NE: 8–9 March 2008:263–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, Fitton TP, Cattaneo SM, Gott VL, et al. Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2004;14:191–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner CR, Stylopoulos N, Howe RD. eds. The role of force feedback in surgery: Analysis of blunt dissection. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; 2002:73–9.
   Google Scholar
• Xin H, Zelek J, Carnahan H. eds. Laparoscopic surgery, perceptual limitations and force: A review. First Canadian Student Conference on Biomedical Computing; 2006; Ontario, Canada:44–9.
   Google Scholar
• Westebring-Van Der Putten E, Goossens R, Jakimowicz J, Dankelman J. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery-a review. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17:3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiley CE, Akinbiyi T, Burschka D, Chang DC, Okamura AM, Yuh DD. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. A haptic interface for computer-integrated endoscopic surgery and training. Virtual Reality. 2006;9:160–76.
   Google Scholar
• Shimoga KB. ed. A survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation. II. Finger touch feedback. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium; 18–22 Sept 1993; New York, NY, USA: IEEE 271–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kitagawa M, Okamura A, Bethea B, Gott V, Baumgartner W. Analysis of suture manipulation forces for teleoperation with force feedback. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI. 2002;2002:155–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kenngott HG, Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Rassweiler J, Gutt CN. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17:160–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner CR, Stylopoulos N, Jackson PG, Howe RD. The benefit of force feedback in surgery: Examination of blunt dissection. Presence. 2007;16:252–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mahvash M, Voo LM, Kim D, Jeung K, Wainer J, Okamura AM. Modeling the forces of cutting with scissors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:848–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery - Results and analysis. Ann Surg. 2005;241:102–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoerdsma W, Herder J, Horward M, Jansen A, Bannenberg J, Grimbergen C. Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 1997;6:274–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herder J, Horward M, Sjoerdsma W. A laparoscopic grasper with force perception. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 1997;6:279–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schostek S, Binser MJ, Rieber F, Ho C-N, Schurr MO, Buess GF. Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2299–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner CR, Howe RD. Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task. IEEE Trans Robot. 2007;23:1235–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner CR. Force feedback in surgery: physical constraints and haptic information. Massachusetts: Harvard University Cambridge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Afshari E, Najarian S, Simforoosh N, Hajizade Farkoush S. Design and fabrication of a novel tactile sensory system applicable in artificial palpation. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2011;20:22–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahvash M, Gwilliam J, Agarwal R, Vagvolgyi B, Su L-M, Yuh DD, et al. editors. Force-feedback surgical teleoperator: controller design and palpation experiments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2008; 2008:465–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gwilliam JC, Mahvash M, Vagvolgyi B, Vacharat A, Yuh DD, Okamura AM. editors. Effects of haptic and graphical force feedback on teleoperated palpation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA'09; 2009: IEEE 677–82.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi Dalvand M, Shirinzadeh B, Shamdani AH, Smith J, Zhong Y. An actuated force feedback enabled laparoscopic instrument for robotic assisted surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2013; In press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moradi Dalvand M, Shirinzadeh B, Nahavandi S, Karimirad F, Smith J. editors. Force measurement capability for robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery systems. International Conference on Intelligent Automation and Robotics (ICIAR 2013); 23–25 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JD, Rosen J, Moreyra M, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurement of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:71–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heijnsdijk EAM, Pasdeloup A, Van der Pijl A, Dankelman J, Gouma D. The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:980–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preusche C, Ortmaier T, Hirzinger G. Teleoperation concepts in minimal invasive surgery. Control Eng Pract. 2002;10:1245–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi Dalvand M, Shirinzadeh B. Forward kinematics analysis of offset 6-RRCRR parallel manipulators. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2011. 225:3011–18.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi Dalvand M, Shirinzadeh B. Motion control analysis of a parallel robot assisted minimally invasive surgery/microsurgery system (PRAMiSS). Robot Comput-Integr Manuf. 2013;29:318–27.
   Google Scholar
• Massie THUS, Itkowitz BDUS, Goodwin WA, Chen E, Kapoor D, Cohen AJUS. inventors Force reflecting haptic interface. US patent 20050093821; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu MC, Feygin D, Tendick F. A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the phantom haptic interface and improvements for highperformance control. Presence. 2002;11:555–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Najdovski Z, Abdelrahman W, Nahavandi S, Weisinger H. editors. Augmented optometry training simulator with multi-point haptics. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on; 2012; IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kesner SB, Howe RD. Position control of motion compensation cardiac catheters. IEEE Trans Robot. 2011;27:1045–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen SG, Vasilyev NV, del Nido PJ, Howe RD. Robotic tissue tracking for beating heart mitral valve surgery. Med Image Anal. 2010;17:1236–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Hahn JF. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg. 1998;133:957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar