‘You sometimes get more than you ask for’: responses in referential communication between children and adolescents with cochlear implant and hearing peers

References

• Brinton, B., Fujiki, M.. 1982. A comparison of request–response sequences in the discourse of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 47, 57–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caissie, R., Rockwell, E.. 1993. A videotape analysis procedure for assessing conversational fluency in hearing-impaired adults. Ear and Hearing. 14, 202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie, R., Wilson, E.. 1995. Communication breakdown management during cooperative learning activities by mainstreamed. Volta Review. 97, 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. K., Pisoni, D. B., Horn, D. L., Dillon, C. M.. 2007. Neuropsychological correlates of vocabulary, reading, and working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 12, 461–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E., Moog, J. S., Biedenstein, J., Brenner, C., Hayes, H.. 2009. Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 14, 371–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E., Nicholas, J. G., Sedey, A. L.. 2003. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing. 24, 46S–58S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., Svirsky, M.. 2008. An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?. Ear and Hearing. 29, 492–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibertsson, T., Hansson, K., Asker-Arnason, L., Sahlén, B.. Speech recognition, working memory and conversation in children with cochlear implants. Deafness and Education International. 2009a; 11, 132–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ibertsson, T., Hansson, K., Mäki-Torkko, E., Willstedt-Svensson, U., Sahlén, B.. Deaf teenagers with cochlear implants in conversation with hearing peers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2009b; 44, 319–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanes, R. C., Nienhuys, T. G. W. M., Rickards, F. W.. 2000. The pragmatic skills of profoundly deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 5, 237–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koshik, I.. 2002. A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics. 34, 1851–1877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loy, B., Warner-Czyz, A. D., Tong, L., Tobey, E. A., Roland, P. S.. 2010. The children speak: an examination of the quality of life of pediatric cochlear implant users. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 142, 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., 2000, The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 1: Transcription Format and Programs Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., Rhoten, C., Fabich, M.. 2007. Effects of cochlear implants on children's reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 12, 269–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, M., 2007, Pragmatic Impairment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Cleary, M.. 2003. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing. 24, 106S–120S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D., Kronenberger, W., Conway, C., Horn, D., Karpicke, J., Henning, S., 2008, Efficacy and effectiveness of cochlear implants in deaf children. In Marschark M., Hauser P. C. (eds), Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–101.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G.. 2003. Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review. 68, 939–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarant, J. Z., Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., Clark, G. M., Gibson, W. P. R.. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing. 22, 18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, M., Houston-Price, C., Dawson, N.. 2005. The prompt hypothesis: clarification requests as corrective input for grammatical errors. Applied Psycholinguistics. 26, 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., 2007, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Sacks, H.. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica. 8, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Schorr, E. A., Roth, F. P., Fox, N. A.. 2008. A comparison of the speech and language skills of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Communication Disorders Quarterly. 29, 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, P. E.. 2004. Individual differences in language performance after cochlear implantation at one to three years of age: child, family, and linguistic factors. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 9, 395–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky, M. A., Robbins, A. M., Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., Miyamoto, R. T.. 2000. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science. 11, 153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M. A., Teoh, S. W., Neuburger, H.. 2004. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiology and Neuro-Otology. 9, 224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., Sedivy, J. C.. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 268, 1632–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N.. 2003. Conversational fluency of children who use cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing. 24, 82S–89S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchanski, R. M., Geers, A. E.. 2003. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear and Hearing. 24, 90S–105S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar