References
- Gilbert D, Walley T, New B. Lifestyle medicines. Br Med J. 2000;321:1341–4.
- Kochen M, Himmel W. A critical assessment of the impact factor. Eur J Gen Pract. 1998;4:159–63.
- Kelly M, Moran JA. The general practice case report revisited. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004;10:4–5.
- Abbasi K. Let's dump impact factors. Br Med J. 2004;329: 1–8.
- Tudor Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971;297: 405–12.
- Svab I. Changing research culture. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2: S30–4.
- van Weel C, Rosser W. Improving health care globally: A critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:S5–16.
- Bradley CP. Primary care research: Not a lost cause but still struggling to find its feet. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004;10:136–7.
- de Maeseneer J, van Weel C. Research in general practice in Europe: A growing community. Eur J Gen Pract. 2001; 7:90–1.
- van Weel C. The impact of research in primary care and family medicine: The Thomson Reuters Web of Science Subject Category ‘Primary Health Care’. Fam Pract. 2011;28:239–40.
- Hutchinson A, Becker LA. How the philosophies, styles, and methods of family medicine affect the research agenda. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:S41–4.
- Hummers-Pradier E, Beyer M, Chevallier P, Cos X, Eilat-Tsanani S, Fink W, . Research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Maastricht: European General Practice Research Network EGPRN; 2009.