The value of visualizing tone of voice

References

• Alm N, Newell A. 1996. Being an interesting conversation partner. In: von Tetzchner S, Jensen M, editors. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. London: Whurr Publishers; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Portnuff C. Augmentative and alternative communication: a user's perspective. Lecture delivered at the Oregon Health and Science University, 18 August 2006 [online]. Available at: http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index-8121.php.html (accessed 20 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Maslow A. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 1943;50:370–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R, King S. Joint prosodic and segmental unit selection speech synthesis. Proc Interspeech 2006, Pittsburgh; 17–21 September.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman P. Basic emotions. In: Dalgleish T, Power M, editors. Handbook of cognition and emotion. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. p. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt F. Expressive synthetic speech. 2012 (last updated 20 November) [online]. Available at: http://emosamples.syntheticspeech.de/ (accessed 29 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Laukka P, Juslin P, Bresin R. A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion. Cognition & Emotion. 2005;19:633–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JA. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39:1161–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandak M, Bhutekar S. Corpus based emotion extraction to implement prosody feature in speech synthesis systems. IJCER. 2012;1:67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gunes H, Schuller B, Pantic M, Cowie R. Emotion representation, analysis and synthesis in continuous space: a survey. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG’11), EmoSPACE 2011— 1st International Workshop on Emotion Synthesis, rePresentation, and Analysis in Continuous spacE. IEEE: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, March 2011. p. 827–34.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham J. Humanizing vox artificialis: the role of speech synthesis in augmentative and alternative communication. In: Mullennix J, Steven Stern S, editors. Computer synthesized speech technologies: tools for aiding impairment. Hershey, New York: Medical Information Science Reference; 2010; p. 50–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell M. The tipping point. New York: Little Brown; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jones D. An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: WH Heffer; 1936.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor J, Arnold G. Intonation of colloquial English. Bristol: Longman; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal D. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Austin JL. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson R. Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok T, editor. Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1960. p. 350–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe G, Rhees R, editors; Anscombe G, translator. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1958. (1st ed. 1953).
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1995;28:233–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw GB. Androcles and the lion, Overruled, Pygmalion. London: Constable; 1916.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T, Katz B. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne A, Raby F. Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. London: August/Birkhaüser; 2001. p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin G, Cook A. Six Speaking Chairs (not directly) for people who cannot speak. Interactions. 2010;17:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Buchenau M, Fulton Suri J. Experience prototyping. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques 2000. New York: ACM, 17–19 August. p. 424–433.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin G. Design meets disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009; p. 827–34.
   Google Scholar
• Neurath O. International picture language. London: Kegan Paul; 1936.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod R. Speech hedge. 2010 [online]. Available at: http://vimeo.com/14582462 (accessed 17 July 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Kiely O. Pattern. London: Conran Octopus; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte E. Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Fallman D, Stolterman E. 2010. Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research. Digital Creativity. 2010;21:265–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A, Newell C. Creative speech technology network, 2010. Available at: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/crest/wiki/Documents/Case%20for%20Support.pdf (accessed 17 July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies. 1982;3:221–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moggridge B. Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Smithsonian Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum. Remembering Bill: life & work. Available at: http://www.cooperhewitt.org/remembering-bill/life-work (accessed 10 September 2012).
   Google Scholar