Computer game as a tool for training the identification of phonemic length

References

• Lyytinen H, Erskine J, Kujala J, Ojanen E, Richardson U. In search of a science based application: a learning tool for reading acquisition. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50:668–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen H, Erskine J, Ahonen T, Aro M, Eklund K, Guttorm T, et al. Early identification and prevention of dyslexia: results from a prospective follow-up study of children at family risk for dyslexia. In: Reid G, Fawcett A, Manis F, Siegel L, editors. The SAGE handbook of dyslexia. London: Sage Publishers; 2008. p. 121–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen H, Ronimus M, Alanko A, Poikkeus A-M, Taanila M. Early identification of dyslexia and the use of computer game-based practice to support reading acquisition. Nordic Psychology. 2007;59:109–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saine N, Lerkkanen M-K, Ahonen T, Tolvanen A, Lyytinen H. Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Dev. 2011;82:1013–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [LukiMat]. Available at: http://www.lukimat.fi/lukimat-en?set_language = en (accessed 8 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl P. Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979;66:1668–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science. 1992;255:606–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintikka S, Aro M, Lyytinen H. Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units. Written Language & Literacy. 2005;8:79–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka S, Landerl K, Aro M, Lyytinen H. Training reading fluency: is it important to practice reading aloud and is generalization possible?Ann Dyslexia. 2008;58:59–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer S, Landerl K, Aro M, Lyytinen H. Training reading fluency among poor readers of German: many ways to the goal. Ann Dyslexia. 2008;58:115–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson U, Aro M, Lyytinen H. Prevention of reading difficulties in highly transparent Finnish. In: McCardle P, Miller B, Lee J, Tzeng O, editors. Dyslexia accross languages: orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2011. p. 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson P, Hazan V, Bannister K. Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:3267–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson P, Evans BG. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126:866–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylinen S, Uther M, Latvala A, Vepsäläinen S, Iverson P, Akahane-Yamada R, et al. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second language users of English. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010;22:1319–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai G, Hirose K. Teaching the pronunciation of Japanese doublemora phonemes using speech recognition technology. Speech Communication. 2000;30:131–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Silva V. Quantity and quality as universal and specific features of sound systems—experimental phonetic research on interaction of Russian and Finnish sound systems. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Vihanta V. Suomi vieraana kielen foneettiselta kannalta [Finnish as a foreign language in phonetic point of view]. In: Tommola J, editor. Foreign language comprehension and production: AFinLa yearbook 1990. Turku: AFinLa; 1990. p. 199–225.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister R, Flege JE, Piske T. The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English, and Estonian. J Phon. 2002;30:229–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylinen S, Shestakova A, Alku P, Huotilainen M. The perception of phonological quantity based on durational cues by native speakers, second-language users and non-speakers of Finnish. Lang Speech. 2005;48:313–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen J. Aspect of quantity in standard Finnish. Jyväskylä: K. J. Gummerus; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson F. Suomen yleiskielen segmentaalifoneemien paradigma [The paradigm of segmental phonemes of Finnish standard language]. Virittäjä. 1969;73:351–62.
   Google Scholar
• Suomi K, Toivanen J, Ylitalo R. On the phonological interpretation of the quantity opposition. In: Suomi K, Toivanen J, Ylitalo R, editors. Finnish sound structure: phonetics, phonology, phonotactics, and prosody. Studia humaniaria Ouluensia 9. Oulu: University of Oulu; 2008. p. 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Iivonen A. äännekeston riippuvuus sanan pituudesta irrallaan äännetyiss äsanoissa [The dependence of phoneme duration of the word length in sounds pronounced independently]. Virittäjä. 1974;78:134–51.
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen S, Shestakova A, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R. Linguistic relevance of duration within the native language determines the accuracy of speech-sound duration processing. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003;16:492–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennala R, Richardson U, Ylinen S, Lyytinen H, Martin M. Tietokoneavusteinen suomen kielen kvantiteetin harjoittelu: venäjä nkielisen suomea opettelevan lapsen ja suomenkielisen luku- ja kirjoitush äiriäisen lapsen vertailu [Computer-assisted training of Finnish quantity with a Russian second-language learner of Finnish and a reading-disabled native speaker]. Puhe ja kieli. 2011;31:3–24. Abstract in English on final page.
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen S, Shestakova A, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R. Speech-sound duration processing in a second language is specific to phonetic categories. Brain Lang. 2005;92:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvén M. Lapsen kaksikielinen varhaiskehitys [The bilingual development of a child]. In: Korpilahti P, Aaltonen O, Laine M, editors. Kieli ja aivot [Language and brain]. Turku: University of Turku, Kognitiivisen neurotieteen tutkimuskeskus; 2010. p. 139–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004; 45:2–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee JP. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä J. Sanantunnistus [Identification of words]. In: Korpilahti P, Aaltonen O, Laine M, editors. Kieli ja aivot [Language and brain]. Turku: University of Turku, Kognitiivisen neurotieteen tutkimuskeskus; 2010. p. 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Portin M, Laine M. Processing cost associated with inflectional morphology in bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2001;4:55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Balota DA, Chumbley JL. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: lexical access and/or production?J Mem Lang. 1985;24:89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani C, Marcolini S, Stella G. How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography?Brain Lang. 2002;81:568–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juphard A, Carbonnel S, Valdois S. Length effect in reading and lexical decision: evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant. Brain Cogn. 2004;55:332–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami U. Orthography, phonology, and reading development: a cross-linguistic perspective. In: Joshi RM, Aaron PG, editors. Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 463–80.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1992;18:234–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger J. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. J Mem Lang. 1990; 29:228–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available at: http://www.sanakirja.org/search.php?id = 227854&l2 = 17 (accessed 8 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink P. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.3.19). 2005. Available at: http://www.praat.orgS (accessed 7 November 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ Psychol. 2003;38:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser RM. Skill acquisition theory. In: VanPatten B, Williams J, editors. Theories in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Pennala R, Eklund K, Hämäläinen J, Richardson U, Martin M, Leiwo M, et al. Perception of phonemic length and its relation to reading and spelling skills in children with family risk for dyslexia in the first three grades of school. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53:710–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen A. Auditiivisen ja kielellisen harjoittelun vaikutus kolmannella luokalla olevien heikkojen lukijoiden lukutaitoon [Auditive and speech training of reading-disabled 3rd Grade children with familial risk for dyslexia and the assessment of training effects]. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social research 443. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä;. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ramus F, Mehler J. Language identification with suprasegmental cues: a study based on speech resynthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105:512–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther FH, Husain FT, Cohen MA, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;106: 2900–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni DB, Lively SE, Logan JS. Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: implications for theories of speech perception. In: Goodman JC, Nusbaum HC, editors. The development of speech perception: the transition from speech sounds to spoken words. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1994. p. 121–66.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel AG. Speech perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:49–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrachione TK, Lee J, Ha LYY, Wrong PCM. Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130:461–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis N, Beaton A. Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993;46: 533–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar