Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli

References

• Schoentgen J. Vocal cues of disordered voices. Acta Acustica. 2006;92:667–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendahl R. Laryngeal analog synthesis of jitter and shimmer auditory parameters of harshness. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1966;18:98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman R. Effect of waveform changes upon roughness perception. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1971;23:314–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heiberger V, Horii S. Jitter and shimmer in sustained phonation. In: Lass N, editor. Speech and language, advances in basic research and practice, vol. 7. New York: Academic Press; 1982. p. 299–332.
   Google Scholar
• Imaizumi S, Gauffin J. Acoustic and perceptual modeling of the voice quality caused by fundamental frequency perturbation. Proc. Interspeech (Banff, Canada), ISCA Archive. 1992;133–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J. Perception of aperiodicities in synthetically generated voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;83:2361–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers D, Ding C. Articulatory synthesis: nasal sounds and male and female voices. J Phonetics. 1991;19:453–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers D, Ahn C. Modeling the glottal volume velocity waveform for three voice types. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97:505–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM. Some difference limens for the perception of breathiness. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120:416–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan CC, Titze I. Perception of pitch and roughness in vocal signals with subharmonics. J Voice. 2001;15:165–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Xu Y. Perceived pitch of synthesized voice with alternate cycles. J Voice. 2002;16:443–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gabelman B, Gerratt BR. Perception of vocal tremor. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:203–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan CC, Titze I, Story B. The perception of two vocal qualities in a synthesized vocal utterance: ring and pressed voice. J Voice. 2004;18:305–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozsypal AJ, Millar BF. Perception of jitter and shimmer in synthetic vowels. J Phonetics. 1979;7:343–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers D, Lee C. Vocal quality factors—analysis, synthesis, and perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991;90:2394–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson R, Granstrom B, Karlsson I. Experiments with voice modeling in speech synthesis. Speech Commun. 1991;10: 481–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, Berke GS. Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36:14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerratt BR, Kreiman J. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:2560–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117:2201–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Antoanzas-Barroso N, Gerratt BR. Integrated software for analysis and synthesis of voice quality. Behav Res Meth. 2010;42:1030–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Wien, New York: Springer; 1982. p. 81–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fraj S, Schoentgen J, Grenez F. Development and perceptual assessment of a synthesizer of disordered voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;132:2603–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckere P, Schoentgen J, Giordano A, Fraj S, Bocchi L, Manfredi C. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: Perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2011;36:70–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze I. The myoelastic aerodynamic theory of phonation. Denver CO, Iowa City IA: National Center for Voice and Speech; 2006. p. 265.
   Google Scholar
• Schoentgen J. Shaping function models of the phonatory excitation signal. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114:2906–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P. Vowels and consonants. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. p. 146.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerrat B. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108: 1867–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu E, Murdoch B, Hird K, Lau P. Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:1091–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollschlaeger D. Grundlagen der Datenanalyse mit R: Eine anwendungs-orientierte Einführung. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 194.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt B. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:1598–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt B, Ito M. When and why listener disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 122:2354–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar