Sperm quality and its relationship to natural and assisted conception: British Fertility Society Guidelines for practice

References

• Aitken, R.J. & De Iuliis, G.N. (2007). Value of DNA integrity assays for fertility evaluation. Society of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 65, 81–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almagor, M., Benbenishti, D., Rosenak, D., Mogle, Y., & Yaffe, H. (1993). Simultaneous swim-up/swim-down of sperm in assisted reproduction procedures. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 10, 261–265.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, J.G. & Storey, B. (1992). Evidence for increased lipid peroxidative damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as a mode of sublethal cryodamage to human sperm during cryopreservation. Journal of Andrology, 13, 232–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen, N.A., Carlsen, E., & Loft, A. (2008). Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection marked variability between countries. Human Reproduction Update, 14, 593–604.
   Google Scholar
• Andreou, E., Mahmoud, A., Vermeulen, L., Schoonjans, F., & Comhaire, F. (1995). Comparison of different methods for the investigation of antisperm antibodies on spermatozoa, in seminal plasma and in serum. Human Reproduction, 10, 125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antinori, M., Licata, E., Dani, G., Cerusico, F., Versaci, C., d’Angelo, D., & Antinori, S. (2008). Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 16, 835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arny, M. & Quagliarello, J. (1987). Semen quality before and after processing by a swim-up method: relationship to outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 48, 643–648.
   Google Scholar
• Ayvaliotis, B., Bronson, R., Rosenfeld, D., & Cooper, G. (1985). Conception rates in couples where autoimmunity to sperm is detected. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 739–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badawy, A., Elnashar, A., & Eltotongy, M. (2009). Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 777–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos, H.W., Thompson, J.G., Feil, D., & Lane, M. (2008). Sperm DNA damage is associated with assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. International Journal of Andrology, 31, 518–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballachey, B.E., Evenson, D.P., & Saacke, R.G. (1988). The sperm chromatin structure assay. Relationship with alternate tests of semen quality and heterospermic performance of bulls. Journal of Andrology, 9, 109–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barratt, C.L., Havelock, L.M., Harrison, P.E., & Cooke, I.D. (1989). Antisperm antibodies are more prevalent in men with low sperm motility. International Journal of Andrology, 12, 110–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barratt, C.L.R., Tomlinson, M.J., & Cooke, I.D. (1992). Prognostic significance of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility. Fertility and Sterility, 60, 520–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, C.L.R. & Cooke, I.D. (1993). Donor Insemination. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, C.L., Naeeni, M., Clements, S., & Cooke, I.D. (1995). Clinical value of sperm morphology for in-vivo fertility: comparison between World Health Organization criteria of 1987 and 1992. Human Reproduction, 10, 587–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barratt, C.L., Kay, V., & Oxenham, S.K. (2009). The human spermatozoon a stripped down but refined machine. Journal of Biology, 8, 63.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, C.L.R., Aitken, R.J., Björndahl, L., Carrell, D.T., de Boer, P., Kvist, U., et al. (2010). Sperm DNA: organization, protection and vulnerability: from basic science to clinical applications–a position report. Human Reproduction, 25, 824–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoov, B., Eltes, F., Pansky, M., Lederman, H., Caspi, E., & Soffer, Y. (1993). Estimating fertility potential via semen analysis data. Human Reproduction, 8, 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoov, B., Berkovitz, A., & Eltes, F. (2001). Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1067–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoov, B., Berkovitz, A., Eltes, F., Kogosovsky, A., Yagoda, A., Lederman, H., et al. (2003). Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 1413–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchaib, M., Lornage, J., Mazoyer, C., Lejeune, H., Salle, B., & Guerin, J.F. (2007). Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensdorp, A.J., Cohlen, B.J., Heineman, M.J., & Vandekerckhove, P. (2007). Intra-uterine insemination for male subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 18, CD000360.
   Google Scholar
• Berkovitz, A., Eltes, F., Yaari, S., Katz, N., Barr, I., Fishman, A., & Bartoov, B. (2005). The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Human Reproduction, 20, 185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besselink, D.E., Farquhar, C., Kremer, J.A., Marjoribanks, J., & O’Brien, P. (2008). Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 16, CD000317.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, P.G., Manicardi, G.C., Urner, F., Campana, A., & Sakkas, D. (1996). Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Molecular Human Reproduction, 2, 139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boe-Hansen, G.B., Fedder, J., Ersbøll, A.K., & Christensen, P. (2006). The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Human Reproduction, 21, 1576–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde, J.P., Ernst, E., Jensen, T.K., Hjollund, N.H., Kolstad, H., Henriksen, T.B., et al. (1998). Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet, 352, 1172–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongso, T.A., Ng, S.C., Mok, H., Lim, M.N., Teo, H.L., Wong, P.C., & Ratnam, S.S. (1989). Effect of sperm motility on human in vitro fertilization. Archives of Andrology, 22, 185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, C.M., Heineman, M.J., Cohlen, B.J., & Farquhar, C. (2007). Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 17, CD004507.
   Google Scholar
• Borini, A., Tarozzi, N., Bizzaro, D., Bonu, M.A., Fava, L., Flamigni, C., & Coticchio, G. (2006). Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Human Reproduction, 21, 2876–2881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostofte, E., Bagger, P., Michael, A., & Stakemann, G. (1990). Fertility prognosis for infertile men: results of follow-up study of semen analysis in infertile men from two different populations evaluated by the Cox regression model. Fertility and Sterility, 54, 1100–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, E.F., Estes, M.A., & Muller, C.H. (1999). Advanced semen analysis: a simple screening test to predict intrauterine insemination success. Fertility and Sterility, 71, 547–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronson, R.A., Cooper, G.W., & Phillips, D.M. (1989). Effects of anti-sperm antibodies on human sperm ultrastructure and function. Human Reproduction, 4, 653–657.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, P.F., Barratt, C.L., & Cooke, I.D. (1994). The more accurate timing of insemination with regard to ovulation does not create a significant improvement in pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program. Fertility and Sterility, 61, 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Buckett, W.M., Luckas, M.J., Aird, I.A., Kingsland, C.R., & Lewis-Jones, D.I. (1998). The evaluation of the sperm migration test as a predictor for success with intrauterine insemination. International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine, 43, 257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, M., Humaidan, P., Axmon, A., Spano, M., Bungum, L., Erenpreiss, J., & Giwercman, A. (2007). Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Human Reproduction, 22, 174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. & Palmer, J.R. (2001). A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women. Fertility and Sterility, 75, 656–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilla, J.A., Zamora, S., Gonzalvo, M.C., Luna del Castillo, J.D., Roldan-Nofuentes, J.A., Clavero, A., et al. (2010). Sperm chromatin structure assay and classical semen parameters: systematic review. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 114–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayli, S., Jakab, A., Ovari, L, Delpiano, E., Celik-Ozenci, C., Sakkas, D., et al. (2003). Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 7, 462–468.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zhang, W., Luo, Y., Long, X., & Sun, X. (2009). Predictive value of semen parameters in in vitro fertilisation pregnancy outcome. Andrologia, 41, 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G.N., Lopata, A., McBain, J.C., Baker, H.W., & Johnston, W.I. (1985). Effect of sperm antibodies in males on human in vitro fertilization (IVF). American Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Microbiology, 8, 62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee, K., Kruge, T.F., & Lombard, C.J. (1998). Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Human Reproduction Update, 4, 73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlen, B.J., te Velde, E.R., van Kooij, R.J., Looman, C.W., & Habbema, J.D. (1998). Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Human Reproduction, 13, 1553–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlen, B.J., Vandekerckhove, P., te Velde, E.R., & Habbema, J.D. (2000). Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD000360.
   Google Scholar
• Comhaire, F.H., Hinting, A., Vermeulen, L., Schoonjans, F., & Goethals, I. (1988). Evaluation of the direct and indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction with latex particles for the diagnosis of immunological infertility. International Journal of Andrology, 11, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T.G., Noonan, E., von Eckardstein, S., Auger, J., Gordon Baker, H.W., Behre, H.M., et al. (2009). World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reproduction Update, 16, 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D.R. (1958). The regression analysis of binary sequences (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 20, 215–242.
   Google Scholar
• Critser, J.K., Villines, P.M., Coulam, C.B., & Critser, E.S. (1989). Evaluation of circulating anti-sperm antibodies in fertile and patient populations. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 21, 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Culligan, P.J., Crane, M.M., Boone, W.R., Allen, T.C., Price, T.M., & Blauer, K.L. (1998). Validity and cost-effectiveness of antisperm antibody testing before in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 69, 894–898.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R.O. & Gravance, C.G. (1994). Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods. Journal of Andrology, 15, 83–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Almeida, M., Gazagne, I., Jeulin, C., Herry, M., Belaisch-Allart, J., Frydman, R., et al. (1989). In-vitro processing of sperm with autoantibodies and in-vitro fertilization results. Human Reproduction, 4, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Devroey, P., Boostanfar, R., Koper, N.P., Mannaerts, B.M., Ijzerman-Boon, P.C., & Fauser, B.C. (2009). A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol. Human Reproduction, 24, 3063–3072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakeley, A.J., Jorgensen, A., Sklavounos, J., Aust, T., Gazvani, R., Williamson, P., & Kingsland, C.R. (2008). A randomized controlled clinical trial of 2295 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers. Human Reproduction, 23, 1101–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Ducot, B., Spira, A., Feneux, D., & Jouannet, P. (1988). Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. II. Study of clinical characteristics–practical consequences. International Journal of Andrology, 11, 395–404.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, E.H., Morshedi, M., Taylor, S., & Oehninger, S. (2002). Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Human Reproduction, 17, 3122–3128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, D.P., Jost, L.K., Marshall, D., Zinaman, M.J., Clegg, E., Purvis, K., et al. (1999). Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Human Reproduction, 14, 1039–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, D.P., Baer, R.K., & Jost, L.K. (1989). Long-term effects of triethylenemelamine exposure on mouse testis cells and sperm chromatin structure assayed by flow cytometry. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 14, 79–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, D.P., Jost, L.K., Baer, R.K., Turner, T.W., & Schrader, S.M. (1991). Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reproductive Toxicology, 5, 115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson, D.P., Kasperson, K., & Wixon, R.L. (2007). Analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using flow cytometry and other techniques. Society of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 65, 93–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández, J.L., Muriel, L., Rivero, M.T., Goyanes, V., Vazquez, R., & Alvarez, J.G. (2003). The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. Journal of Andrology, 24, 59–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrara, I., Balet, R., & Grudzinskas, J.G. (2002). Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime. Human Reproduction, 17, 2320–2324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiddelers, A.A., van Montfoort, A.P., Dirksen, C.D., Dumoulin, J.C., Land, J.A., Dunselman, G.A., et al. (2006). Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction, 21, 2090–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, R. de C., Braga, D.P., Setti, A.S., Iaconelli, A. Jr., & Borges, E. Jr. (2011). Morphological nuclear integrity of sperm cells is associated with preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening cycle outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 990–993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford, W.C., Williams, K.M., McLaughlin, E.A., Harrison, S., Ray, B., & Hull, M.G. (1996). The indirect immunobead test for seminal antisperm antibodies and fertilization rates at in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 11, 1418–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francavilla, F., Romano, R., Santucci, R., Marrone, V., Properzi, G., & Ruvolo, G. (1997). Interference of antisperm antibodies with the induction of the acrosome reaction by zona pellucida (ZP) and its relationship with the inhibition of ZP binding. Fertility and Sterility, 67, 1128–1133.
   Google Scholar
• French, D.B., Sabanegh, E.S. Jr., Goldfarb, J., & Desai, N. (2010). Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation, live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI cycles? Fertility and Sterility, 93, 1097–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, C., Liu, D.Y., Clarke, G.N., Rushford, D.D., & Baker, H.W. (2003). Automated semen analysis: ‘zona pellucida preferred’ sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Human Reproduction, 18, 1643–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Van de Meerssche, M., & Valkenburg, M. (1999). Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction, 14, 2581–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwercman, A., Lindstedt, L., Larsson, M., Bungum, M., Spano, M., Levine, R.J., & Rylander, L. (2010). Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control studyInternational Journal of Andrology, 33, E221–E227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, J.M., Mascha, E., Falcone, T., & Attaran, M. (1999). Comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor sperm: a meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 72, 792–795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guzick, D.S., Overstreet, J.W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C.K., Nakajima, S.T., Coutifaris, C., et al. (2001). Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1388–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammadeh, M.E., Kühnen, A., Amer, A.S., Rosenbaum, P., & Schmidt, W. (2001). Comparison of sperm preparation methods: effect on chromatin and morphology recovery rates and their consequences on the clinical outcome after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. International Journal of Andrology, 24, 360–368.
   Google Scholar
• Hellema, H.W. & Rümke, P. (1976). Comparison of the tray agglutination technique with the gelatin agglutination technique for the detection of spermagglutinating activity in human sera. Fertility and Sterility, 27, 284–92.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, R., Hajimohammad, M., Stalf, T., Hoogendijk, C., Mehnert, C., Menkveld, R., et al. (2004). Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 965–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M.A., Noiles, E.E., Gao, D., Mazur, P., & Critser, J.K. (1993). Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa IV. The effects of cooling rate and warming rate on the maintenance of motility, plasma membrane integrity, and mitochondrial function.Fertility and Sterility, 60, 911–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershlag, A., Paine, T., Kvapil, G., Feng, H., & Napolitano, B. (2002). In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure. Fertility and Sterility, 77, 229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, A.M., Barik, S., Rizk, B., Kulkarni, P.M., & Thorneycroft, I.H. (1999). Analysis of in vitro migration patterns of human spermatozoa by a petri dish-based horizontal column. Biology of Reproduction, 61, 406–410.
   Google Scholar
• Høst, E., Lindenberg, S., & Smidt-Jensen, S. (2000). DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa: correlation with fertilization in vitro in oligozoospermic men and in men with unexplained infertility. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 79, 189–193.
   Google Scholar
• Hotaling, J.M., Smith, J.F., Rosen, M., Muller, C.H., & Walsh, T.J. (2011). The relationship between isolated teratozoospermia and clinical pregnancy after in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1141–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.C., Lin, D.P., Tsao, H.M., Cheng, T.C., Liu, C.H., & Lee, M.S. (2005). Sperm DNA fragmentation negatively correlates with velocity and fertilization rates but might not affect pregnancy rates. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2008). A long term analysis of the HFEA Register data (1991–2006). http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Latest_long_term_data_analysis_report_91-06.pdf.pdf. Accessed 15.12.2012
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, W.W., Randolph, J.F. Jr., Ansbacher, R., Menge, A.C., Ohl, D.A., & Brown, A.N. (1993). Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 59, 339–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huszar, G., Ozkavukcu, S., Jakab, A., Celik-Ozenci, C., Sati, G.L., & Cayli, S. (2006). Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18, 260–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakab, A., Sakkas, D., Delpiano, E., Cayli, S., Kovanci, E., Ward, D., et al. (2005). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 1665–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, P.S., Wolfe, C.A., Mackie, A., Ladha, S., Prentice, A., & Jones, R. (1999). Lipid dynamics on the plasma membrane of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction, 14, 1827–1832.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan, K., Hopkisson, J., Campbell, B., Johnson, I., Thornton, J., & Raine-Fenning, N. (2010). A randomised controlled trial of 300 versus 225 IU recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in predicted normal responders by antral follicle count. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117, 853–862.
   Google Scholar
• Jouannet, P., Ducot, B., Feneux, D., & Spira, A. (1988). Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristicsInternational Journal of Andrology, 11, 379–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junk, S.M., Matson, P.L., Yovich, J.M., Bootsma, B., & Yovich, J.L. (1986). The fertilization of human oocytes by spermatozoa from men with antispermatozoal antibodies in semen. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 3, 350–352.
   Google Scholar
• Keel, B.A., Quinn, P., Schmidt, C.F., Serafy, N.T. Jr., Serafy, N.T. Sr & Schalue, T.K. (2000). Results of the American association of bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology. Human Reproduction, 15, 680–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel, B.A., Stembridge, T.W., Pineda, G., & Serafy, N.T. Sr. (2002). Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 78, 603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel, B.A. (2004). How reliable are results from the semen analysis? Fertility and Sterility, 82, 41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan, B.R., Barton, S., Sanchez, X., Berkeley, A.S., Krey, L.C., & Grifo, J. (2007). Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 88, 1583–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, M.R., Rasmussen, P.E., Erb, K., Laursen, S.B., Rex, S., & Westergaard, L.G. (2001). Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 1131 cycles. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 80, 342–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kini, S., Morrell, D., Thong, K.J., Kopakaki, A., Hillier, S., & Irvine, D.S. (2010). Lack of impact of semen quality on fertilization in assisted conception. Scottish Medical Journal, 55, 20–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilani, Z., Ismail, R., Ghunaim, S., Mohamed, H., Hughes, D., Brewis, I., & Barratt, C.L. (2004). Evaluation and treatment of familial globozoospermia in five brothers. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 1436–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, P., Kovats, T., Sajgo, A., Szollosi, J., Matyas, S., & Kaali, S.G. (2011). The role of hyaluronic acid binding assay in choosing the fertilization method for patients undergoing IVF for unexplained infertility. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28, 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, T.F., Menkveld, R., Stander, F.S., Lombard, C.J., Van der Merwe, J.P., van Zyl, J.A., & Smith, K. (1986). Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 46, 1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, T.F., Acosta, A.A., Simmons, K.F., Swanson, R.J., Matta, J.F., & Oehninger, S. (1988). Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 49, 112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix, B. & Warter, S. (1982). Cytophotometric study of spermatozoa in normal subjects. Andrologia, 14, 110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki, A. (1993). In-vitro fertilization in the presence of antisperm antibodies detected by the mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) and the tray agglutination test (TAT). Human Reproduction, 8, 84–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen, L., Scheike, T., Jensen, T.K., Bonde, J.P., Ernst, E., Hjollund, N.H., et al. (2000). A Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.Human Reproduction, 15, 1562–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefièvre, L., Bedu-Addo, K., Conner, S.J., Machado-Oliveira, G.S., Chen, Y., Kirkman-Brown, J.C., et al. (2007). Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation? Reproduction, 133, 675–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Lannou, D. & Lansac, J. (1989.)Artificial procreation with frozen donor semen: experience of the French Federation CECOS. Human Reproduction, 4, 757–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Lannou, D., Gastard, E., Guivarch, A., Laurent, M.C., & Poulain, P. (1995). Strategies in frozen donor semen procreation. Human Reproduction, 10, 1765–1774.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzi, A., Gandini, L., Lombardo, F., Rago, R., Paoli, D., & Dondero, F. (1997). Antisperm antibody detection: 2. Clinical, biological, and statistical correlation between methods. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 38, 224–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S.E. (2007). Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction, 134, 31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M.H., Kuo-Kuang Lee, R., Li, S.H., Lu, C.H., Sun, F.J., & Hwu, Y.M. (2008). Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.Y., Clarke, G.N., & Baker, H.W. (1991). Inhibition of human sperm-zona pellucida and sperm-oolemma binding by antisperm antibodies Fertility and Sterility, 55, 440–442.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D.Y., Liu, M.L., Garrett, C., & Baker, H.W. (2007). Comparison of the frequency of defective sperm-zona pellucida (ZP) binding and the ZP-induced acrosome reaction between subfertile men with normal and abnormal semen. Human Reproduction, 22, 1878–1884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahadevan, M. & Trounson, A.O. (1984). Relationship of fine structure of sperm head to fertility of frozen human semen. Fertility and Sterility, 41, 287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makler, A., Murillo, O., Huszar, G., Tarlatzis, B., DeCherney, A., & Naftolin, F. (1984). Improved techniques for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. I. A self-migratory method. International Journal of Andrology, 7, 61–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makler, A., Stoller, J., Blumenfeld, Z., Feigin, P.D., & Brandes, J.M. (1993). Investigation in real time of the effect of gravitation on human spermatozoa and their tendency to swim-up and swim-down. International Journal of Andrology, 16, 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Marshburn, P.B., McIntire, D., Carr, B.R., & Byrd, W. (1992). Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 58, 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P.G. (1997). Has traditional sperm analysis lost its clinical relevance? Fertility and Sterility, 67, 596–587.
   Google Scholar
• Meintjes, M., Chantilis, S.J., Ward, D.C., Douglas, J.D., Rodriguez, A.J., Guerami, A.R., et al. (2009). A randomized controlled study of human serum albumin and serum substitute supplement as protein. Human Reproduction, 24, 782–789.
   Google Scholar
• Menkveld, R., Stander, F.S., Kotze, T.J., Kruger, T.F., & van Zyl, J.A. (1990). The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Human Reproduction, 5, 586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld, R., Rhemrev, J.P, Franken, D.R., Vermeiden, J.P., & Kruger, T.F. (1996). Acrosomal morphology as a novel criterion for male fertility diagnosis: relation with acrosin activity, morphology (strict criteria), and fertilization in vitro. Fertility and Sterility, 65, 637–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld, R., Wong, W.Y., Lombard, C.J., Wetzels, A.M., Thomas, C.M., Merkus, H.M., & Steegers-Theunissen, R.P. (2001). Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Human Reproduction, 16, 1165–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merviel, P., Heraud, M.H., Grenier, N., Lourdel, E., Sanguinet, P., & Copin, H. (2010). Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, I.D., Ilott, S., Dixon, L., & Brison, D.R. (2002). The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Human Reproduction, 17, 990–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morroll, D.R., Lieberman, B.A., & Matson, P.L. (1993). The detection of antisperm antibodies in serum: a comparison of the tray agglutination test, indirect immunobead test and indirect SpermCheck assay. International Journal of Andrology, 16, 207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muriel, L., Garrido, N., Fernández, J.L., Remohí, J., Pellicer, A., de los Santos, M.J., & Meseguer, M. (2006a). Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muriel, L., Meseguer, M., Fernández, J.L., Alvarez, J., Remohí, J., Pellicer, A., & Garrido, N. (2006b). Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study. Human Reproduction, 21, 738–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2004). Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Clinical Guideline 11. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London. ISBN 1-84257-546-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S.C., Robinson, J.N., Sargent, I.L., & Barlow, D.H. (1997). Detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma by flow cytometry: comparison with the indirect immunobead binding test. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 1114–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs, M., Creemers, E., Cox, A., Franssen, K., Janssen, M., Vanheusden, E., et al. (2009). Chromomycin A3 staining, sperm chromatin structure assay and hyaluronic acid binding assay as predictors for assisted reproductive outcome. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 19, 671–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P. & Vandekerckhove, P. (2000). Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD000317.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M., McClure, N., Powell, L.A., & Lewis, S.E.M. (2003). Differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA status of high-density and low-density sperm fractions after density centrifugation preparation. Fertility and Sterility, 79, 754–762.
   Google Scholar
• Ombelet, W., Bosmans, E., Janssen, M., Cox, A., Vlasselaer, J., Gyselaers, W., et al. (1997). Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing. Human Reproduction, 12, 987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacey, A.A. (2006). Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A view from the andrology laboratory.Human Reproduction, 21, 1105–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Pacey, A.A. (2010). Quality assurance and quality control in laboratory andrology. Asian Journal of Andrology, 12, 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pandian, Z., Bhattacharya, S., Vale, L., & Templeton, A. (2005). In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 18, CD003357.
   Google Scholar
• Parmegiani, L., Cognigni, G.E., Bernardi, S., Troilo, E., Ciampaglia, W., & Filicori, M. (2010). “Physiologic ICSI”: hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 598–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., Louanjli, N., Ziane, Y., Louanjli, T., Le Roy, C., Gueganic, N., et al. (2011). Study of aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in gametes of patients with severe teratozoospermia. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Rajah, S.V., Parslow, J.M., Howell, R.J., & Hendry, W.F. (1993). The effects on in-vitro fertilization of autoantibodies to spermatozoa in subfertile men. Human Reproduction, 8, 1079–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Ravel, C., Chantot-Bastaraud, S., Siffroi, J.P., Escalier, D., Antoine, J.M., & Mandelbaum, J. (2006). Tail stump syndrome associated with chromosomal translocation in two brothers attempting intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 719. e1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, D., Pacey, A.A., & Whittington, K. (2005). Lack of compliance in UK Andrology laboratories to World Health Organisation recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Human Reproduction, 20, 3441–3445.
   Google Scholar
• Rümke, P. (1965). Autospermagglutinins: a cause of infertility in men. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 30, 696–701.
   Google Scholar
• Rumke, P. & Hellinga, G. (1959). Autoantibodies against spermatozoa in sterile men. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 32, 357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakkas, D., Manicardi, G.C., Tomlinson, M., Mandrioli, M., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, P.G., & Bianchi, U. (2000). The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Human Reproduction, 15, 1112–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, R., Villagrán, E., Risopatrón, J., & Célis, R. (1994). Evaluation of nuclear maturity in human spermatozoa obtained by sperm-preparation methods. Andrologia, 26, 173–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Brunborg, G., Stevenson, M., Lutton, D., McManus, J., & Lewis, S.E. (2010). Clinical significance of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction outcome. Human Reproduction, 25, 1594–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Lutton, D., McManus, J., & Lewis, S.E. (2011). Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 652–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Proutski, I., Stevenson, M., Jennings, D., McManus, J., Lutton, D., & Lewis, S. E. (2013)Sperm DNA damage has a negative association with live-birth rates after IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 26, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza Setti, A., Ferreira, R.C., Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, D., de Cássia Sávio Figueira, R., et al. (2010). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morpho logically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21, 450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiessens, C., Vanderschueren, D., Meuleman, C., & D’Hooghe, T. (2003). Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 1185–1189.
   Google Scholar
• Sukcharoen, N, & Keith, J. (1995). The effect of the antisperm auto-antibody-bound sperm on in vitro fertilization outcome. Andrologia, 27, 281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Tarozzi, N., Nadalini, M., Bizzaro, D., Serrao, L., Fava, L., Scaravelli, G., & Borini, A. (2009). Sperm-hyaluronan-binding assay: clinical value in conventional IVF under Italian law. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 9, Suppl 3, pp35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M.J., Barratt, C.L.R., & Cooke, I.D. (1993). Prospective study of leukocytes and leukocyte subpopulations in semen suggests they are not a cause of male infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 60, 1069–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M.J., Amissah-Arthur, J.B., Thompson, K.A., Kasraie, J., & Bentick, B. (1996). Prognostic indicators for IUI: Statistical model for IUI success. Human Reproduction, 118, 1892–1896.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M.J., Moffatt, O., Manicardi, G., Bizarro, D., Afnan, M., & Sakkas, D. (2001). Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: Implications for assisted conception. Human Reproduction, 10, 2160–2165.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. (2010). Is your andrology service up to scratch? Human Fertility, 13, 194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomsu, M., Sharma, V., & Miller, D. (2002). Embryo quality and IVF treatment outcomes may correlate with different sperm comet assay parameters. Human Reproduction, 17, 1856–6182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye, H., Verheyen, G., Albano, C., Camus, M., Van Landuyt, L., Devroey, P., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2002). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature. Fertility and Sterility, 78, 1030–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Steeg, J.W., Steures, P., Eijkemans, M.J., Habbema, J.D.F., Hompes, P.G., Kremer, J.A., et al. (2010). Role of semen analysis in subfertile couples. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1013–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Van Waart, J., Kruger, T.F., Lombard, C.J., & Ombelet, W. (2001). Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Human Reproduction Update, 7, 495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Weert, J.M., Repping, S., Van Voorhis, B.J., van der Veen, F., Bossuyt, P.M., & Mol, B.W. (2004). Performance of the post wash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 612–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Weert, J.M., Repping, S., van der Steeg, J.W., Steures, P., van der Veen, F., & Mol, B.W. (2005). IUI in male subfertility: are we able to select the proper patients? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 11, 624–631.
   Google Scholar
• Velez de la Calle, J.F., Muller, A., Walschaerts, M., Clavere, J.L., Jimenez, C., Wittemer, C., & Thonneau, P. (2008). Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion test in assisted reproductive technology programs: results of a large prospective multicenter study. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 1792–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst, S.M., Cohlen, B.J., Hughes, E., Te Velde, E., & Heineman, M.J. (2006). Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 18, CD001838.
   Google Scholar
• Vujisić, S., Lepej, S.Z., Jerković, L., Emedi, I., & Sokoli, B. (2005). Antisperm antibodies in semen, sera and follicular fluids of infertile patients: relation to reproductive outcome after in vitro fertilization. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 54,13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, R., Merlet, F., Ducot, B., Bailly, M., Tribalat, S., & Lombroso, R. (1995). Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa. Human Reproduction, 10, 2919–2922.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, R., Albert, M., Dorion, A., Bailly, M., Bergère, M., Lombroso, R., et al. (2004). Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Human Reproduction, 19, 2060–2065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann, L., Isola, J., & Tuohimaa, P. (1994). Prognostic variables in predicting pregnancy. A prospective follow up study of 907 couples with an infertility problem. Human Reproduction, 9, 1102–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, S.S., Viti, D., David, S.S., Stangel, J., & Rosenwaks, Z. (1992). Relation between antisperm antibodies and the rate of fertilization of human oocytes in vitro. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 9, 9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1987). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-cervical Mucus Interaction, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1992). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1999). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th ed. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y.Q., Ng, V., Yeung, W.S., & Ho, P.C. (1996). Profiles of sperm morphology and motility after discontinuous multiple-step Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Andrologia, 28, 127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H., Huang, G.N., Gao, Y., Liu D. Y. (2006). Relationship between human sperm-hyaluronan binding assay and fertilization rate in conventional in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 21, 1545–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinaman, M.J., Brown, C.C., Selevan, S.G., & Clegg, E.D. (2000). Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. Journal of Andrology, 21, 145–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zini, A., Meriano, J., Kader, K., Jarvi, K., Laskin, C.A., & Cadesky, K. (2005). Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI. Human Reproduction, 20, 3476–3480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zini, A., Boman, J.M., Belzile, E., & Ciampi, A. (2008). Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 23, 2663–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zini, A., Lefebvre, J., Kornitzer, G., Bissonnette, F., Kadoch, I.J., Dean, N., & Phillips, S. (2011). Anti-sperm antibody levels are not related to fertilization or pregnancy rates after IVF or IVF/ICSI. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 88, 80–84.
   Google Scholar