Users, carers and professionals experiences of treatment and care for heroin dependency: Implications for practice. A preliminary study

References

• Bancroft, A., Carty, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Backett-Milburn, K. (2002). Support for the Families of Drug Users: A review of the literature. Edingburgh: Scottish Executive Effective Interventions Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. ( Eds). (1999). Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, M. (2005). Drugs in the Family: The impact on parents and siblings. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Best, D., Campbell, A., & O'Grady, A. (2006). The NTA's first annual user satisfaction survey 2005. London: NHS/National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Copello, A. & Orford, J. (2002). Addiction and the family: Is it time for services to take notice of the evidence? Addiction, 97, 1361–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham-Burley, S., Kerr, A., & Pavis, S. (1999). Theorizing subjects and subject matter in focus group research. In: Barbour, R.S., & Kitzinger, J. ( Eds), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, theory and practice. Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS). (2006). New Strategic Direction for Alcohol and Drugs 2006–2011. Belfast: DHSSPS.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkin, P., De Civita, M., Paraherakis, A., & Gill, K. (2002). The role of functional support in treatment retention and outcomes among outpatient adult substance abusers. Addiction, 97, 347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drug and Alcohol Information and Research Unit (DAIRU)/Department of Health & Social Services and Public Safety Research (DHSS). (2006). Estimating the prevalence of Problem Opiate and Problem Cocaine Use in Northern Ireland. The Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, on behalf of the Northern Ireland Drug and Alcohol Campaign.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., Chin, A. T., Kuo, I., Kirst, M., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Canadian illicit opiate users' views on methadone and other opiate prescription treatment: An exploratory qualitative study. Substance Use & Misuse, 37. 495–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T. (2006). Best practice in focus group research: Making sense of different views. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56, 491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, J., Ricciardelli, L., & Ridge, D. (2005). Users experiences of heroin and methadone treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 1875–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happell, B., Carta, B., & Pinikahana, J. (2002). Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding substance use: A questionnaire survey. Nursing and Health Sciences, 4, 193–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins, K. & Kilpatrick, R. (2005). The impact of paramilitary violence against a heroin user community in Northern Ireland: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16, 334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleber, H. (1993). The US anti-drug prevention strategy: Science and policy connections. In: Edwards, G., Strang, J., & Jaffe, J. ( Eds) Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco: Making the science and policy connections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knodel, J. (1993). The Design and Analysis of Focus Group Studies: A practical approach. In: Morgan, D. L. ( Ed.) Successful Focus Groups—Advancing the State of the Art. London: Sage Focus.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analysing and Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli-Casey, P., Domier, C. P., & Rawson, R. A. (2002). The gap between research and practice in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatric Services, 53, 984–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., D'Aummo, T., & Smith, B. (2000). Increasing access and providing social services to improve drug use treatment for women with children. Addiction, 95, 1237–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElrath, K. (2001). Heroin Use in Northern Ireland: A qualitative study into heroin users' lifestyles, experiences and risk behaviours (1997–1999). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• McElrath, K. & Jordan, M. (2005). Drug Use and Risk Behaviours among Injecting Drug Users, review commissioned by the Drug and Alcohol Information and Research Unit, Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety on behalf of Northern Ireland Drugs and Alcohol Campaign.
   Google Scholar
• McKeganey, N., Morris, Z., Neale, J., & Robertson, M. (2004). What are drug users looking for when they contact drug services: Abstinence or harm reduction? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 11, 423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. F., McKenna, H. P., & Leslie, J. C. (2000). The perceptions and aspirations illicit drug users hold toward health care staff and the care they receive. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 7, 435–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. F., McKenna, H. P., Leslie, J. C., Robinson, J., & Moore, K. (2006). Illicit drug users in Northern Ireland: Perceptions and experiences of health and social care professionals. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13, 682–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. & Ruben, S. (2005). Treating drug dependence in primary care. In: Strang, J., & Gossop, M. ( Eds) Heroin Addiction and the British System: Treatment and policy responses, (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mistral, W., & Velleman, R. (2001). Substance-misusing patients in primary care: Incidence, services provided and problems. A survey of general practitioners in Wiltshire. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 8, 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning Focus Groups: Focus Group Kit 2. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In: Morgan, D. L. ( Ed.) Successful Focus Groups—Advancing the State of the Art. London: Sage Focus.
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. (2006). Models of Care for Treatment of Adult Drug Misusers: Update 2006, London: Department of Health/Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J. (1998). Drug users' views of drug service providers. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6, 308–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Shread, L., & Tompkins, C. N. E. (2007). Factors that help injecting drug users to access and benefit from services: A qualitative study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention & Policy, 2, 31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, R. & Burnard, P. (2006). Research for Evidence-based Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Office. (1999). Drug Strategy for Northern Ireland. Belfast: NIO.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA). (2006). Statistics from the Northern Ireland Substitute Prescribing Database: 31^st March 2006. Belfast: Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, NISRA.
   Google Scholar
• Parahoo, K. (2006). Nursing Research: Principles, process and issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peckover, S. & Childlaw, R. G. (2007). Too frightened to care? Accounts by district nurses working with clients who misuse substances. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15, 238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Police Service of Northern Ireland. (2007). Drug Seizures & Arrests. Statistical Report No. 4. (1st April 2006-31st March 2007). Belfast: Central Statistics Branch, PSNI.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rassool, G. H. (2000). Addiction: Global problem and global response. Complacency or commitment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 505–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzetti, C. M. & Lee, R. L. ( Eds). (1993). Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Ulster Constabulary. (1996). Chief Constable's Annual Report 1995. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, L. & Zador, D. (2004). Patients prescribed injectable heroin or methadone—their opinions and experiences of treatment. Addiction, 99, 442–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, H. (2002). Families in Focus England: A report on a series of consultative conversations held in urban and rural areas of England during late 2001 and early 2002. London: ADFAM.
   Google Scholar
• Small, D. & Drucker, E. (2006). Policy makers ignoring science and scientists ignoring policy: The medical ethical challenges of heroin treatment. Harm Reduction Journal, 3, 16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strang, J. & Gossop, M. (2005). The British System of drug policy: Extraordinary individual freedom, but to what end? In: Strang, J. & Gossop, M. ( Eds) Heroin Addiction and the British System: Treatment and policy responses. (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Treleor, C. & Holt, M. (2006). Deficit models and divergent philosophies: Service providers' perspectives on barriers and incentives to drug treatment. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar