Manual rotation to reduce caesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position

References

• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births. Preliminary data for 2007. National vital statistics reports, Web release; vol 57 no 12. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Released March 18, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Duff P. Pathophysiology and management of post cesarean endomyometritis. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:269–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petitti DB. Maternal mortality and morbidity in cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985;28:763–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:842–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Lower urinary tract operative injuries. ACOG educational bulletin 238, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson EL, Lawrenson RA, Nightingale AL, Farmer RD. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001;108:56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs. elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner M, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, et al Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. NEJM 2004;351:2581–2589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta fand prior cesarean section. Obset Gynecol 1985;66:89–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention and relationship to cesarean delivery. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:36.e1–36.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Dobbie R. Cesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003;362:1779–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1996; Issue 1. Art. no.:CD000083.
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; Issue 3 Art. no.:CD003766.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, Owen J, Savage KG, Hauth JC. Active phase arrest: Revisiting the 2 hour minimum. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:550–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Health people 2010. 2nd ed. Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols. Part 16 Maternal, Infant, and Child Health. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, Nov 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence. Birth 2002;29:28–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senecal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD. Effect of fetal position on second stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:763–772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: Obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1027–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain V, Guleria K, Gopalan S, Narang A. Mode of delivery in deep transverse arrest. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1993;43:129–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Med 2006;19:563–568.
   Google Scholar
• Gardberg M, Tuppurainen M. Persistent occiput posterior presentation – a clinical problem. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:45–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer AR, Nirmal DM. Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcomes in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:749–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:837–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargill YM, MacKinnon CJ, Arsenault MY, Bartellas E, Daniels S, Gleason T et al Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004;26:747–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walkowiak RG. Manual rotation of the transverse posterior occiput. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37:464–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Ray C, Serres P, Schmitz T, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:873–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichman O, Gdansky E, Latinsky B, Labi S, Samueloff A. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:25–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK, Caughey AB. Manual rotation of the fetal occiput: predictors of success and delivery. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:e7–e9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton PD. Births: preliminary data 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2004;53:1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:933–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar