620
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter?

, &
Pages 648-653 | Received 08 Mar 2011, Accepted 31 May 2011, Published online: 01 Aug 2011

References

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: Nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192–202.
  • Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: Update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661–666.
  • Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: Antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3–56.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Electronic fetal monitoring. Electronic fetal monitoring: The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based guideline number 8. London, RCOG Press; 2001.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1232–1240.
  • Elliott C, Warrick PA, Graham E, Hamilton EF. Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: Association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:258.e1–258.e8.
  • Parer JT, King TL. Fetal heart rate monitoring: The next step? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:520–521.
  • Clinical Management of Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate Patterns: Variable decelerations. In: Freeman RK, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP, eds. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. 3rd Edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003, pp. 115–119.
  • Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:26.e1–26.e6.
  • Westgate JA, Wibbens B, Bennet L, Wassink G, Parer JT, Gunn AJ. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: A physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:236.e1–236.11.
  • Tortosa MN, Acién P. Evaluation of variable decelerations of fetal heart rate with the deceleration index: Influence of associated abnormal parameters and their relation to the state and evolution of the newborn. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;34:235–245.
  • Gaziano EP. A study of variable decelerations in association with other heart rate patterns during monitored labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:360–363.
  • Ozden S, Demirci F. Significance for fetal outcome of poor prognostic features in fetal heart rate traces with variable decelerations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999;262:141–149.
  • Krebs HB, Petres RE, Dunn LJ. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VIII. Atypical variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:297–305.
  • Riley RJ, Johnson JW. Collecting and analyzing cord blood gases. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:13–23.
  • Helwig JT, Parer JT, Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Umbilical cord blood acid-base state: What is normal? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1807–12; discussion 1812.
  • Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Alessandri LM, O’Sullivan F, Burton PR, Pemberton PJ, Stanley FJ. Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: The Western Australian case-control study. BMJ 1998;317:1549–1553.
  • Parer JT, Hamilton EF. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:451.e1–451.e7.
  • Warrick P, Hamilton E, and Macieszczak M. “Neural network based detection of fetal heart rate patterns,” in Neural Networks, 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference, Vol. 4, 2005, pp. 2400–2405.
  • Vergara IA, Norambuena T, Ferrada E, Slater AW, Melo F. StAR: A simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:265.
  • Warrick PA, Hamilton EF, Precup D, Kearney RE. Classification of normal and hypoxic fetuses from systems modeling of intrapartum cardiotocography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:771–779.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.