Can vibroacoustic stimulation improve the efficiency of a tertiary care antenatal testing unit?

References

• Druzin ML, Edersheim TG, Hutson JM, Bond AL. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on the nonstress test at gestational ages of thirty-two weeks or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1476–1478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware DJ, Devoe LD. The nonstress test. Reassessment of the “gold standard”. Clin Perinatol 1994;21:779–796.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marden D, McDuffie RS Jr, Allen R, Abitz D. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:1386–1388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papadopoulos VG, Decavalas GO, Kondakis XG, Beratis NG. Vibroacoustic stimulation in abnormal biophysical profile: verification of facilitation of fetal well-being. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:191–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CV. Vibroacoustic stimulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995;38:68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan KH, Smyth R. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1);CD002963.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999, re-affirmed 2009 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 94(4) Oct 1999:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer DM, Menashe M, Sadovsky E. Severe fetal bradycardia caused by external vibratory acoustic stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:334–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laventhal NT, Dildy GA 3rd, Belfort MA. Fetal tachyarrhythmia associated with vibroacoustic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1116–1118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohel G, Simon A, Beyth Y, Sadovsky E. Intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation in cases of normal and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1986;21:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• East CE, Smyth R, Leader LR, Henshall NE, Colditz PB, Tan KH. Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD004664.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olesen AG, Svare JA. Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:818–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devoe LD. Antenatal fetal assessment: contraction stress test, nonstress test, vibroacoustic stimulation, amniotic fluid volume, biophysical profile, and modified biophysical profile–an overview. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:247–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobby P. Multiple assessment techniques evaluate antepartum fetal risks. Pediatr Ann 2003;32:609–616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buss C, Davis EP, Class QA, Gierczak M, Pattillo C, Glynn LM, Sandman CA. Maturation of the human fetal startle response: evidence for sex-specific maturation of the human fetus. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes G, Signorini MG, Arduini D, Cerutti S. Fetal heart rate variability due to vibroacoustic stimulation: linear and nonlinear contribution. Methods Inf Med 2004;43:47–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López Ramón Y, Cajal C. Response of the fetal pupil to vibro-acoustic stimulation: a fetal attention test. Early Hum Dev 2011 87:199–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swartz AE, Ruma MS, Kim E, Herring AH, Menard MK, Moise KJ Jr. The effect of fetal heart rate on the peak systolic velocity of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1225–1229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morokuma S, Fukushima K, Kawai N, Tomonaga M, Satoh S, Nakano H. Fetal habituation correlates with functional brain development. Behav Brain Res 2004;153:459–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrikovsky BM, Kaplan G, Holsten N. Eyelid movements in normal human fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:299–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrovic O, Finderle A, Prodan M, Skunca E, Prpic I, Zaputovic S. Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:152–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellieni CV, Severi F, Bocchi C, Caparelli N, Bagnoli F, Buonocore G, Petraglia F. Blink-startle reflex habituation in 30-34-week low-risk fetuses. J Perinat Med 2005;33:33–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gingras JL, Mitchell EA, Grattan KE. Fetal homologue of infant crying. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F415–F418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner J, Hains SM, Kisilevsky BS. An exploratory study of fetal behavior at 33 and 36 weeks gestational age in hypertensive women. Dev Psychobiol 2002;41:156–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velásquez Torres B, Ramírez Calvo JA, Gallardo Gaona JM, Acevedo Gallegos S, Guzmán Huerta ME. [Perinatal results of the patients assessed by fetal hypomotility]. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2006;74:265–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoh JK, Park YS, Cha KJ, Park MI. Fetal heart rate after vibroacoustic stimulation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;106:14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Elia A, Pighetti M, Vanacore F, Fabbrocini G, Arpaia L. Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2005;81:449–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coatleven F. [Place of fetal heart rate monitoring and its computerized analysis during the surveillance of prolonged pregnancy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2011;40:774–784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park YJ, Park SH, Kim YJ, Hoh JK, Park YS, Park MI. Computerized fetal heart rate monitoring after vibroacoustic stimulation in the anencephalic fetus. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:569–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: www.marchofdimes.com/peristats. Accessed on 15 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Reports. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs. Accessed on 15 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986;42:121–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolnick JM, Garcia G, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez TL, Andrade EH, Goldsmit DM, De La Huerta MIP, Garcia RBL. The value of antepartum fetal heart rate with vibroacoustic stimulation (translation). Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 1993;61:356–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newnham JP, Burns SE, Roberman BD. Effect of vibratory acoustic stimulation on the duration of fetal heart rate monitoring tests. Am J Perinatol 1990;7:232–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez-Delboy A, Weiss J, Michels A, Cleary J, Shevell T, Malone F. A randomized trial of vibroacoustic stimulation for antenatal fetal testing [abstract]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:S146.
   Google Scholar
• Salamalekis E, Batalias L, Kassanos D, Loghis C, Pyrgiotis E, Zourlas PA. The acoustic stimulation test and antenatal cardiotocography as diagnostic tools in high risk pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;15:292–294.
   Google Scholar
• Saraçoglu F, Göl K, Sahin I, Türkkani B, Oztopçu C. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 1999;19:103–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleuthel MR. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal heart rate in nonstress tests. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nursing 1990;19:199–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:131–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tongsong T, Piyamongkol W. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Reprod Med 1994;39:17–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar