Peripartum complications with cesarean delivery: a review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network publications

References

• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2008. National vital statistics reports; vol. 59 no. 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms SF, Paul RH, Iams JD, et al. Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;76:960–6
   Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration – relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:211–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, Leindecker S, Landon M, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: uterine atony after primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1127–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom SL, Spong CY, Weiner SJ, et al. Complications of anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:281–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor following prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1016–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varner MW, Leindecker S, Hibbard JU, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:135–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:6–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom SL, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2195–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse DJ, MacPherson CA, Landon M, et al. Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:891–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailit JL, Landon MB, Thom EA, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: impact of time of day on cesarean complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1132–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:885–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1226–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnwald CP, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: safety and efficacy of a trial of labor in preterm pregnancy after a prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1119–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peaceman AM, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1127–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:124–33
   Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:917–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:806–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis J, Landon MB, Gersnoviez RJ, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: perioperative morbidity among HIV infected women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:385–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:801–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varner MW, Thom EA, Spong CY, et al. Trial of labor after one previous cesarean delivery for multifetal gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:814–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesareans. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1249–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse D, et al. Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Cesarean delivery for the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:748–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailit JL, Landon MB, Lai Y, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: impact of shift change on cesarean complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:173.e1–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:30.e1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciscione A, Landon MB, Leveno KJ, et al. Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of subsequent uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:648–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:285–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellhaas CS, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:224–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmoor MJ, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for nonlaboring cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:752–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009;360:111–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:56.e1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhshi T, Landon MB, Lai Y, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeat cesarean delivery in women with a prior classical versus low transverse uterine incision. Am J Perinatol 2010;27:791–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier CM, Landon MB, Lai Y, et al. White's classification of maternal diabetes and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in women undergoing a trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2011;115:60–4
   Google Scholar
• Wylie BJ, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1134–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tita AT, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:117:280–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011;25:37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:262–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanek KD, Kirmeyer SE, Martin JA, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2009. Pediatrics 2012;129:338–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, et al. Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995–2008. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1095–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care 2009;47:234–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getahun D, Kaminsky LM, Elsasser DA, et al. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:376.e1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders TA, Lobel M, Veloso C, Meyer BA. Prenatal maternal stress is associated with delivery analgesia and unplanned cesareans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2006;27:141–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health 2006;96:867–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meikle SF, Steiner CA, Zhang J, Lawrence WL. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:751–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:601–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, et al. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:45.e1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:326.e1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1341–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• , Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal MedicineBelfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:430–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Albrechtsen S, Dalaker K. Obstetric history and the risk of placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:502–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:89–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta 2012;33:244–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM. Pathophysiology of placenta acreta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta 2008;29:639–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong TY. The pathology of placenta accreta, a worldwide epidemic. J Clin Pathol 2008;61:1243–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Infectious disease in obstetrics and gynecology: a systematic approach to management. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan SR, Murphy DJ. A pregnant Jehovah's witness. BMJ 2008;15:337
   Google Scholar
• Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 2001;344:467–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang LT, Tain YL, Lai MC, Yang SN. Neonatal seizures: dialogues between clinic and bench. J Formos Med Assoc 2012;111:239–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on National Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: defining the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, et al. Neonatal organ dysfunction among newborns at gestational age 34 weeks and umbilical arterial pH < 7.00. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:261–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Biarge M, Madero R, González A, et al. Perinatal morbidity and risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy associated with intrapartum sentinel events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:148.e1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, et al. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100:348–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisler RE, Cohen A, Ringer SA, Lieberman E. Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. Birth 2003;30:83–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:245.e1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed YY, Watkins MM, Fix M, et al. Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:583.e1–5
   Google Scholar
• Costantine MM, Fox KA, Pacheco LD, et al. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:293–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, et al. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:333
   Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1607–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung WC, Lam HS, Lam KW, et al. Unexpected reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect? BJOG 2003;110:319–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar