1,498
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters to the Editor

Questioning the costs and benefits of non-invasive prenatal testing

, , &
Pages 633-634 | Received 14 May 2013, Accepted 26 Jun 2013, Published online: 31 Jul 2013

References

  • Song K, Musci TJ, Caughey AB. Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1180--5
  • Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:90–102
  • Norton M, Rose N, Benn P. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: clinical assessment and plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:847–50
  • Benn P, Borell A, Chiu R, et al. Position Statement from the aneuploidy screening committee on behalf of the board of the international society for prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2013 April 24. doi: 10.1002/pd.4139. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Flessel MC, Lorey FW. The California Prenatal Screening Program: “options and choices” not “coercion and eugenics”. Genet Med 2011;13:711–13
  • Stoll K, Knutzen D, McClellan M, et al. Genetic counselors in primary prenatal care: improved patient education resulting in reduced healthcare spending. J Genet Couns 2011;20:709–10
  • Park AD, Mathews M. Why do women choose or decline maternal serum screening? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31:149–55
  • Gidiri M, McFarlane J, Holding S, Lindow SW. Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: are women’s perceptions changing? BJOG 2007;114:458–61
  • Chetty S, Garabedian MJ, Norton ME. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:542--6
  • Natoli JL, Ackerman DL, McDermott S, Edwards JG. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: a systematic review of termination rates (1995–2011). Prenat Diagn 2012;32:142–53
  • Metcalfe A, Currie G, Johnson JA, et al. Impact of observed versus hypothesized service utilization on the incremental cost of first trimester screening and prenatal diagnosis for trisomy 21 in a Canadian province. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:429--35
  • Hurford E, Hawkins A, Hudgins L, Taylor J. The decision to continue a pregnancy affected by Down syndrome: timing of decision and satisfaction with receiving a prenatal diagnosis. J Genet Couns 2013 April 21. [Epub ahead of print]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.