Double versus single cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm births

References

• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011;60:1–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K, et al. Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:42e1–18
   Google Scholar
• Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:124e1–19
   Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, et al. Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix? J Perinat Med 2003;31:122–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, Jorgensen AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;4:CD008991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead KD, Wise RB, Dunnihoo DR, Otterson WN. Retrospective analysis of cervical cerclage procedures at the Louisiana State University, Shreveport (1980 to 1987). South Med J 1990;83:159–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secher NJ, McCormack CD, Weber T, et al. Cervical occlusion in women with cervical insufficiency: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial with cerclage, with and without cervical occlusion. BJOG 2007;114:649e1–6
   Google Scholar
• Woensdregt K, Norwitz ER, Cackovic M, et al. Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:396e1–7
   Google Scholar
• Tsai YL, Lin YH, Chong KM, et al. Effectiveness of double cervical cerclage in women with at least one previous pregnancy loss in the second trimester: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009;35:666–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broumand F, Bahadori F, Behrouzilak T, et al. Viable extreme preterm birth and some neonatal outcomes in double cerclage versus traditional cerclage: a randomized clinical trial. Sci World J 2011;11:1660–6
   Google Scholar
• Park JM, Tuuli MG, Wong M, et al. Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two? Am J Perinatol 2012;29:477–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giraldo-Isaza MA, Fried GP, Hegarty SE, et al. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:209e1–9
   Google Scholar
• Zolghadri J, Younesi M, Asadi N, et al. Double versus single cervical cerclage for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:375–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenz JM, Wooliever DE, Jetton JR, Paneth N. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:425–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J, et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ 2012;345:e7961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou S, Abangma G, Johnson S, et al. Costs and health utilities associated with extremely preterm birth: evidence from the EPICure study. Value Health 2009;12:1124–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Pardo J, et al. Expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes: is it all about gestational age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:48e1–8
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mandeel H, Alhindi MY, Sauve R. Effects of intentional delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:83–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati L, Di Vico A, Nucci M, et al. Vaginal microbial flora and outcome of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:589–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saling E, Schreiber M, al-Taie T. A simple, efficient and inexpensive program for preventing prematurity. J Perinat Med 2001;29:199–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar