Twin pregnancy outcomes after increasing rate of vaginal twin delivery: retrospective cohort study in a Hong Kong regional obstetric unit

References

• Wilcox LS, Kiely JL, Melvin CL, Martin MC. Assisted reproductive technologies; estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States. Fertil Steril 1996;65:361–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardes N, Maruthini D, Baleen AH. Modes of conception and multiple pregnancy: a national surveyof babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1727–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogges KA, Chisholm CA. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a review of literature. Obstet Gynaecol Survey 1997;52:728–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann E, Oldenburg A, Rode L, et al. Twin births: caesarean section or vaginal delivery? Acta obstet Gynaecol Scand 2012;91:463–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Shah I, Ehite IR, et al. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG 2005;112:1139–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994–2003: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2007;334:576–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armson EA, O’Connell C, Persad V, et al. Determinants of perintal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin. Obstet Gynaecol 2006;108:556–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestena I, Loureiro T, Almeida A, et al. Effect of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. J Reprod Med 2013;58:15–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Carmavalet Cde C, Azria E, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynaecol 2008;111:695–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita A, Ishil K, Taguchi T, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Perinatal Med 2014;42:769–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venditteli F, Riviere O, Crenn-Hebert C, et al. Is a planned caesarean necessary in twin pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2011;90:1147–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi AC, Mullin PM, Chmait RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011;118:523–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JP, Holloway E, Cuesta C, et al. Outcomes of non-vertex second twins, following vertex vaginal delivery of first twin: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1295–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu AL, Yung WK, Yeung HN, et al. Factors influencing the mode of delivery and associated pregnancy outcomes for twins: a retrospective cohort study in a public hospital. Hong Kong Med J 2012;18:99–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang HT, Liu AL, Yung WK, et al. Rebound Increase in vaginal delivery for twins in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong. IJGO 2014;126:96–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung WK, Liu AL, Lai SF, et al. Performance of a specialized twin pregnancy clinic in a public hospital. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2012;12:21–32
   Google Scholar
• Dodd JM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, et al. Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated tiwn pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2:CD003582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NICE Guidelines. Multiple pregnancy: the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). London: RCOG Press; September 2011
   Google Scholar
• SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. No 155, February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89:319–31
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynaecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. No 115, August 2010. Obstet Gynaecol 116(2, part 1)
   Google Scholar
• RCOG Green Top Guidelines. Birth after previous caesarean birth. No 45. London: RCOG Press; February 2007
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial: Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette H. The rising caesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences? Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:687–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, et al. Trends in caesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995–2008. Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:1095–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souz JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 2010;8:71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 2010;375:490–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltveit AK, Tollanes MC, Pihlstrom H, Irgens LM. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynaecol 2008;111:1327–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenhemier L, et al. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy. BJOG 2007;114:609–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana E, Burgos J, Equiguren N, et al. Influence of chorionicity in intra-partum management of twin deliveries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:407–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssiere C, Benoist G, Blondel B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2011;156:12–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Kyvernitakis I. Vaginal delivery of the second nonvertex twin: avoiding a poor outcome when the presenting part is not engaged. Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:950–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin JG, Newman RB, Mauldin PD. Cost-effective delivery management of the vertex and non-vertex twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:864–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophia NEW, Andrew DL. Internal podalic version with breech extraction. The Obstetrician Gynaecologist 2011;13:7–14
   Google Scholar
• Chailillet N, Dumont A, Bujold E, et al. Quality of care, obstetrics risk management and mode of delivery in QueBEC (QUARISMA): a cluster-randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:S2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar