Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran

References

• UNICEF. Iran, Islamic Republic of 2015. Available from: www.data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_pdfs/corecode/SOWC_2015_all-countries-update_214.xlsx
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization U, UNICEF and Mailman School of Public Health. Monitoring emergency obstetric care A Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, et al. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:587–9
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatrics 2001;138:92–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad-Nia S, Delavar B, Eini-Zinab H, et al. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates. East Mediterr Health J 2009;15:1389–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frass K, Al Harazi A. Outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section in women with one previous section and spontaneous onset of labour. EMHJ 2011;17:646–50
   Google Scholar
• Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ 2010;341: c5065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, et al. Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregn Childbirth 2009;9:17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kealy MA, Small RE, Liamputtong P. Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia. BMC Pregn Childbirth 2010;10:47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostovar R, Rashidian A, Pourreza A, et al. Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method. BMC Pregn Childbirth 2010;10:52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torloni MR, Daher S, Betrán AP, et al. Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women’s magazines: 20 year review. BMJ 2011;342:d276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmaroudi G, Eftekhar H, Batebi A. Cesarean section and related factors in Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2002;1:45–9
   Google Scholar
• Maharlouei N, Moalaee M, Ajdari S, et al. Caesarean delivery in South-Western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey. Med Princ Pract 2012;22:184–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker JL, Frigoletto JFD. Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 2007;356:885–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch C, Walker J. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:621–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dweik D, Girasek E, Töreki A, et al. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:408–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, et al. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:45. e1–e9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I. Behind the myth – few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery 2011;27:620–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, Hesami E, et al. The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries. J Res Med Sci 2013;18:943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu K-H, Tai C-J, Hsu C-S, et al. Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami A, Salarilak S. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy? Iran J Reprod Med 2013;11:301–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hildingsson I. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy. Midwifery 2008;24:46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee LM, Kaimal AJ, Houston KA, et al. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:377. e1–e24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad beigi ATS, Mohammad SN, Yazdani M. Factors influencing cesarean delivery method in Shiraz Hospitals. Iran J Nurs 2009;21:37–45
   Google Scholar
• Akarsu RH, Mucuk S. Turkish women's opinions about cesarean delivery. Pakistan J Med Sci 2014;30:1308–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadori F, Hakimi S, Heidarzade M. The trend of caesarean delivery in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 2013;19:S67–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharlouei N, Moalaee M, Ajdari S, et al. Caesarean delivery in south-western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:184–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghotbi F, Akbari Sene A, Azargashb E, et al. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:1257–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahraki-Sanavi F, Rakhshani F, Navidiyan A, Ansari-Moghaddam A. A study on attitude of pregnant women with intention of elective cesarean based on theory of planned behavior. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2012;14:95–7
   Google Scholar
• Sharifirad GR, Baghiani Moghadam MH, Fathyian Z, Rezaeian M. The effect of health education using behavior intention model on of cesarean in Khomainy-shahr, Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2009;14:105–10
   Google Scholar
• Dweik D, Girasek E, Mészáros G, et al. Non‐medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:1025–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun P, Yanik FB, Zeyneloglu HB, et al. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication? J Maternal–Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1133–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes UA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978–1979 and 1994. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:687–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryding EL, Lukasse M, Parys ASV, et al. Fear of childbirth and risk of cesarean delivery: a cohort study in six European countries. Birth 2015;42:48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt WP, Wisk LE, Cheng ER, et al. Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach. Maternal Child Health J 2015;19:84–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar