Otoacoustic Emissions in the General Adult Population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: II. Effects of Noise, Head Injuries, and Ear Infections: Emisiones Otoacústicas En La Poblacian Adulta General De Nord-Trøndelag, Noruega: II. Efectos Del Ruido, Traumatismos CefÁlicos E Infecciones De oído

References

• Arnold D J, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Influence of ultra-high frequency hearing on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions levels in humans. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1996; 19–25, (abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef I, Horowitz G, Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 612–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer P, Korpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwetz F. Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47.388 noise-exposed workers. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90(6): 3086–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 378–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark W W. Noise exposure from leisure activities: a review. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90(1): 175–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshanks K J, Wiley T L, Tweed T S. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148(9): 879–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn P A, Piskorski P, Keefe D H, Neely S T, Gorga M P. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(2 Pt 1): 964–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Kemp D T. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99(3): 1573–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Woxen O, Arnesen A R, Mair I W. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions as screening for hearing losses at the school for military training. Scand Audiol 1996; 25(1): 71–8
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, Beauchaine L. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93(4): 2050–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz M A, Probst R, Harris F P, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 478–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics — Audiometric test methods. Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO, Geneva 1989; 150: 8253–1
   Google Scholar
• Jokitulppo J S, Bjork E A, Akaan-Penttila E. Estimated leisure noise exposure and hearing symptoms in Finnish teenagers. Scand Audiol 1997; 26(4): 257–62
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography—practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kowalska S, Sulkowski W. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 1997; 10(4): 441–59
   Google Scholar
• Kvaerner K J, Engdahl B, Arnesen A R, Mair I W. Temporary threshold shift and otoacoustic emissions after industrial noise exposure. Scand Audiol 1995; 24(2): 137–41
   Google Scholar
• LePage E L, Murray N M. A new approach to hearing loss prevention. National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) Research & Development Annual Report 1995/96. NAL, Sydney 1995/1996; 25–9
   Google Scholar
• LePage E L, Murray N M. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions [see comments]. Med J Aust 1998; 169(11–12): 588–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L, Heller L M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. J Speech Language Hear Res 1998; 41(6): 1319–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. Epidemiological evaluation of hearing damage related to strongly amplified music (personal casette players; discotheques; rock concerts)—High-definition audiometric survey on 1364 subjects. Audiology 1996; 35: 121–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N M, LePage E L. Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of ageing of the inner ear in an Australian population. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15(2): 59–70
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger M, Korpert K, Raber A, Schwetz F, Bauer P. Hearing loss from industrial noise, head injury and ear disease. A multivariate analysis on audiometric examinations of 110, 647 workers. Audiology 1992; 31(1): 45–57
   Google Scholar
• Nondahl D M, Cruickshanks K J, Wiley T L, Klein R, Klein B E, Tweed T S. Recreational firearm use and hearing loss. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9(4): 352–7
   Google Scholar
• Prieve B A, Gorga M P, Schmidt A. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93(6): 3308–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith P A, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman M E. The prevalence and type of social noise exposure in young adults in England. Noise Health 2000; 6: 41–56
   Google Scholar
• Tambs K, Hoffman H J, Borchgrevink H M, Holmen J. Hearing loss induced by noise, ear infections and head injuries in a large Norwegian sample. Scand Audiol 2002, submitted
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z M, Van Cauwenberge P, Vinck B, De Vel E. Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52(1): 19–24
   Google Scholar
• Zapala D A. A probabilistic approach to quantifying DPOAE detection. Distortion product otoacoustic emission. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9(5): 332–41
   Google Scholar