Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid: Evaluación del sistema de reducción de ruido en un auxiliar auditivo digital comercial

References

• American National Standards Institute. American national standard specification for methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI, New York 1997, ANSI S3.5–1997
   Google Scholar
• Baer T, Moore B CJ, Gatehouse S. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality and response times. J Rehab Res Dev 1993; 30: 49–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench J, Bamford J. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. Academic, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R A, Duve M R. Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 625–639
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boll S F. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing 1979; 27: 113–120
   Google Scholar
• Boymans M, Dreschler W A. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology 2000; 39: 260–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boymans M, Schoneveld P, Verschuure H. Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument. Audiology 1999; 38: 99–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R M, Alexander G C. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlquist M, Lutman M E, Wood S, Leijon A, Boudy J, Bächler H. Proceedings of the 5th European Federation of Audiology Societies (EFAS) Congress, BordeauxFrance, September, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, Lovegrove R. Single-microphone noise reduction systems for hearing aids: a review and an evaluation. Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance, G A Studebaker, I Hochberg. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993; 353–372
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Verschuure H, Ludvigsen C, Westermann S. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. Audiology, 40: 148–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duquesnoy A J, Plomp R. The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 2166–2173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J M, Plomp R. Speech reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 465–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney D J. Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1971
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1258–1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gengel R W. Acceptable speech-to-noise ratios for aided speech discrimination by the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 11: 219–222
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B R, Moore B CJ. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins D B, Yacullo W S. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49: 278–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kompis M, Dillier N. Noise reduction for hearing aids: combining directional microphones with an adaptive beamformer. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 1910–1913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launer S, Moore B CJ. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. Signal processing to restore ‘normal’ loudness perception in a digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2002, 2002 (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Laurence R F, Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear aids and two-channel compression hearing aids in the laboratory and in everyday life. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 31–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. Digital hearing aids. Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance, G A Studebaker, I Hochberg. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993; 317–335
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod A, Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marzinzik M, Kollmeier B. Development and evaluation of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms for digital hearing aids. Psychophysics, physiology and models of hearing, T Dau, V Hohmann, B Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1999; 279–282
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Laurence R F, Wright D. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 175–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Peters R W, Stone M A. Benefits of linear amplification and multi-channel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 400–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Huss M, Vickcrs D A, Glasberg B R, Alcantara J I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Stone M A, Alcantara J I. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 307–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Soli S D, Sullivan J A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsons K S, Bennett R L, Fidell S. Speech levels in various environments. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1976, Report No. 3281
   Google Scholar
• Peters R W, Moore B CJ, Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson P M, Durlach N I, Rabinowitz W M, Zurek P M. Multimicrophone adaptive beamforming for interference reduction in hearing aids. J Rehab Res Dev 1987; 24: 103–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 533–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R, Mimpen A M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preves D A, Sammeth C A, Wynne M K. Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 273–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T, Mueller H G. Making sense of directional microphone hearing aids. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 117–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman T W, Carhart R, Olsen W O. Hearing aid efficiency in a competing speech situation. J Speech Hear Res 1970; 13: 789–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijkhuizen J N, Festen J M, Plomp R. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 885–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss M. Use of an adaptive noise canceller as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid. J Rehab Res Dev 1987; 24: 93–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss M, Neumann A C. Noise reduction in hearing aids. Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance, G A Studebaker, I Hochberg. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993; 337–352
   Google Scholar