Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss: Aplicación de la prueba TEN en adolescentes con hipoacusias severas a profundas

References

• Amos N.E., Humes L.E. The contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in sensorineural hearing loss. Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function, D.J. Breebaart, A.J.M. Houtsma, A. Kohlrauseh, V.F. Prijs, R. Schoonhoven. Shaker, Maastricht 2001; 437–444
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Sac Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I. Ultra-audio metric hearing in the hearing impaired and the use of upward-shifting translating hearing aids. Volta Rev. 1982; 5–7: 352–363
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedures for puretone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 213–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burkhard M.D., Sachs R.M. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 214–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T., Dillon H., Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearingimpaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1128–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chistovich L.A. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957; 2: 743–755
   Google Scholar
• Engström B. Stereocilia of sensory cells in normal and hearing impaired ears. Scand Audiol Suppl 1983; 19: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulkner A., Rosen S., Moore B.C.J. Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 381–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine M., Houtsma A.J.M. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 961–965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.I. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin C., Thornton A., Hasso M. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid filling. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J A const Soc Am 1998; 104: 432–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Jesteadt W. Models of the additivity of masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 1285–1294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L.E., Tharpe A.M., Bratt G.W. Validity of hearing thresholds obtained from the rising portion of the audiogram in sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 206–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killion M.C., Berger E.H., Nuss R.A. Diffuse field response of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: S75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr., London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 5th edn. Academic Press., San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Laurence R.F., Wright D. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 175–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray N., Byrne D. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986; 8: 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Parving A., Elberling C. High-pass masking in the classification of low-frequency hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 173–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick G., Evans E.F., Wilson J.P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E. F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 273–281
   Google Scholar
• Rankovic C.M. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 391–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Recio A. Alteration of basilar membrane response to sound by acoustic overstimulation. Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems, H. Duifhuis, J.W. Horst, P. Van Dijk, S.M. Van Netten. World Scientific, Singapore 1993; 258–265
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Robles L., Recio A. The effects of acoustic trauma, other cochlea injury and death on basilar membrane responses to sound. Scientific Basis of Noise-induced Hearing Loss, A. Axelsson, H. Borchgrevink, R.P. Hamernik, P.A. Hellstrom, D. Henderson, et al. Thicme, Stockholm 1996; 23–35
   Google Scholar
• Schneider B.A., Trehub S.E., Morrongiello B.A., Thorpe L.A. Developmental changes in masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1733–1742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukneeht H.F. Further observations on the pathology of presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80: 369–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht HE. Pathology of the Ear. 2nd edn. Lea and Fcbiger, Philadelphia 1993
   Google Scholar
• Scllick P.M., Patuzzi R., Johnstone B.M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 131–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W. Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 306–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small A.M. Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 1619–1625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Burns E.M., Nelson D.A. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 966–975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Cummings K.J. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 47–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R.S. Frequency resolution in hearing-impaired listeners. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, B.C.J. Moore. Academic Press, London 1986; 309–371
   Google Scholar
• Verrillo R.T. Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 225–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1646–1657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner L.A., Marean G.C. Human. Auditory Development. Westview Press., Boulder, CO 1996
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Oba S., Garde S., Sininger Y., Starr A. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neuro Report 1999; 10: 3429–3435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar