TEOAE recording protocols revised: data from adult subjects: Revision de protocolos de registro de TEOAE: informacion de sujetos adultos

References

• AHEAD. Newsletter of the European Concerted Action on Otoacoustic Emissions. Newsletter of the European Concerted Action on Otoacoustic Emissions 1995; 7: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Berlin C. I., Hood L. J., Hurley A. E., Wen H., Kemp D. T. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 1995; 87: 96–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C. I., Hood L. J., Wen H., Szabo P., Cecola R. P. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Time Frequency Signal Representation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions via Smoothed Pseudo-Wigner Distribution. Report TA129. Karolinska Institute of Technical Audiology, Stockholm 1993
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Time frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo-Wigner distribution. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 91–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direxx J. J., Daemers K., Somers T H, Offeciers F. E., Govaerts P. J. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Ada Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgerald T. S., Prieve B. COAE thresholds: 1. Effects of equal amplitude versus subtraction methods. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 1164–1176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M R, Neely S. T., Bergman B. M., Beauchaine K. L., Kaminski J. R. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearingimpaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94(5): 2639–2648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandori F., Ravazzani P. Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique. Br J Audiol. 1993; 27(2): 97–102
   Google Scholar
• Grandori F, Ravazzani P., Tognola G., Hatzopoulos S. Derived nonlinear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Advances in Otoacoustic Emission, Vol I, F. Grandori, L. Collet, D. Kemp, G. Salomon, K. Shorn. Casa editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; 48–64
   Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S., Cheng J., Grzanka A., Martini A. Time-frequency analyses of TEOAE recordings from normal and SNHL cases. Audiology 2000b; 39: 1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S., Martini M., Cheng J, Grzanka A., Morlet T. Optimization of the TEOAE recording protocols. A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis. A pilot study from neonatal subjects. Scand Audiol 2000a; 29: 21–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S., Mazzoli M., Martini A. Identification of hearing loss using TEOAE-based descriptors: preliminary results. Audiology 1995; 34: 248–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S., Petrucelli J., Pelosi G., Martin A. An optimized neonatal TEOAE screening protocol based on linear stimulus sequences. Ada Otolaryngol (Stock) 1999; 119(2): 135–139
   Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S., Tsakanikos M., Grzanka A., Ratynska J., Martini A. A comparison of neonatal TEOAE responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols. Audiology 2000c; 39: 70–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnsen N. J., Bagi P., Parbo J., Elberling C. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. IV. Final results in 100 neonates. Scand Audiol 1988; 17(1): 27–34
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D. T, Bray P. B., Alexander L., Brown A. M. Acoustic emission cochleography—practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D. T., Ryan S., Bray P. Otoacoustic emission analysis and interpretation for clinical purposes. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emissions, F. Grandori, G. Ciafrone, D. T. Kemp. Karger, Bern 1990; 77–98
   Google Scholar
• Kim D. O. Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system. Hear Res 1986; 22: 105–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuw A. R., Dreschler W A. The relation between otoacoustic emissions and the broadening of the auditory filter for higher levels. Hear Res 1998; 126(1–2): 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M. E. Reliable identification of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions using signal-processing techniques. Br J Audiol 1993; 27(2): 103–108
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M. E., Jennings K., Davis A. C., Houston H. G., Meredith R. Coloration of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions by characteristics of the recording apparatus. Advances in Otoacoustic Emission, Vol. I, F. Grandori, L. Collet, D. Kemp, G. Salomon, K. Shorn. Casa editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; 36–47
   Google Scholar
• Osterhammel P. A., Rasmussen A. N., Olsen S., Nielsen L. H. The influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on the amplitude of transient-evoked emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 187–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patuzzi R. B. A model of the generation of the cochlear microphonic with nonlinear hair cell transduction and nonlinear basilar membrane mechanics. Hear Res 1987; 30: 73–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prieve B. A., Gorga M. P., Schmidt A., Neely S., Peters J. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normalhearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C. A., Guinan J. J., Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(2 Pt 1): 782–798
   Google Scholar
• Thornton A. R. High rate otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 132–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A. R., Shin K., Gottesman E., Hine J. Temporal non-linearities of the cochlear amplifier revealed by maximum length sequence stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 768–777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tognola G., Ravazzani P., Molini E., Ricci G., Alunni N. 'Linear' and 'derived' otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 182–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzl-Muller K., Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994; 33: 28–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead M X., Jimenez A. M., Stagner B. B., McCoy M. J., Lonsbury-Martin B. L. Time-windowing of click-evoked-otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise-ratio. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 599–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Specht H., Ganz M., Pethe J., Leuschner S., Pytel J. Linear versus non-linear recordings of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions—methodological considerations. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 116–118
   Google Scholar
• Zinn C, Maier H., Zenner H., Gummer A. W. Evidence for active, nonlinear, negative feedback in the vibration response of the apical region of the in-vivo guinea-pig cochlea. Hear Res 2000; 142: 159–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwicker E. 'Otoacoustic' emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80: 154–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar