Perception of speech by prelingual pre-adolescent and adolescent cochlear implant users

References

• Boothroyd A. 1968. Developments in speech audiometry. Br J Audiol (formerly Sound), 2, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Hill M., Incerti P., Priolo S. Rushbrook L. 2005. The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol, 44, 677–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Silverman S.R. 1970. Hearing and Deafness. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Daya H., Figueirido J.C., Gordon K.A., Twitchell K. Gysin C. 1999. The role of a graded profile analysis in determining candidacy and outcome for cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 49, 135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell R.C., Dettman S.J., Hill K., Winton E., Barker E.J. . 2002. Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: Older is not always poorer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 189 (Suppl), 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fryauf-Bertschy H., Tyler R.S., Kelsay D.M., Gantz B.J. Woodworth G.G. 1997. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: The influences of age at implant and length of device use. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 183–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Tyler R.S., Woodworth G.G., Tye-Murray N. Fryauf-Bertschy H. 1994. Results of multichannel cochlear implants in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: Five-year follow-up. Am J Otol, 15 (Suppl 2), 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klop W.M.C., Briaire J.J., Stiggelbout A.M. Frijns J.H.M. 2007. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness. Laryngoscope, 117 (11), 1982–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellman S.A., Chute P.M., Kretschmer R.E., Nevins M.E., Parisier S.C. . 1991. The development of a Children's Implant Profile. Am Ann Deaf, 136 (2), 77–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luxford W.M. 1989. Cochlear implant indications. Am J Otol, 10, 95–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manrique M., Cervera-Paz F.J., Huarte A., Perez N., Molina M. . 1999. Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhi-nolaryngol, 49 (Suppl. 1), S193–S197.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel L.L. 2007. Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes. Am J Audiol, 16(2), 118–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, R. 2002. The Effect of Age and Degree of Hearing Loss on Sentence Perception by Children with Hearing Impairment. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Communication Disorders, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Most T. Adi-Bensaid L. 2001. The influence of contextual information on the perception of speech by postlingually and prelingually profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents and adults. Ear Hear, 22, 242–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P.B. Jin S.H. 2004. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 2286–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peasgood A., Brooks N. Graham J. 2003. Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: A pilot study. Cochlear Implants Int, 4, 171–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponton C.W., Moore J.K. Eggermont J.J. 1999. Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: Evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand Audiol, 51 (Suppl), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Santarelli R., De Filippi R., Genovese E. Arslan E. 2008. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Audiol Neuro-otol, 13, 257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm D., Fitzpatrick E. Séguin C. 2002. Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness. Otol Neurotol, 23, 698–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik A.F., Makhdoum M.J., Vermeulen A.M., Brokx J.P. van den Broek P. 1997. The relation between age at the time of cochlear implantation and long-term speech perception abilities in congenitally deaf subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 41, 121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney G.S., Zeng F.G., Litovsky R. Assam P. 2004. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 1081–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky M.A., Chin S.B., Miyamoto R.T., Sloan R.B. Caldwell M. 2000. Speech intelligibility of profoundly deaf pediatric cochlear hearing aid users. Volta Review, 102, 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky M.A., Chin S.B. Jester A. 2007. The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: Clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audiological Medicine, 5(4), 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Teoh S.W., Pisoni D.B. Miyamoto R.T. 2004. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part I: Clinical results. Laryngoscope, 114, 1536–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman S.B. Cohen N.L. 1999. Implantation of patients with prelingual long-term deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 108 (Suppl 177), 84–87.
   Google Scholar
• Waltzman S.B., Roland J., Thomas Jr. Cohen N.L. 2002. Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults. Otol Neurotol, 23, 333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H. McArdle R. 2005 Speech signals used to evaluate function status of the auditory system. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42(4), (Suppl 2), 79–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zonshtein Y. 1969. Everyday sentence test for adults. Internal report (in Hebrew). Tel-Aviv University, Israel: Department of Communications Disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Zwolan T.A., Kileny P.R. Telian S.A. 1996. Self-report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelingually deafened adults. Ear Hear, 17, 198–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar