Assessing the benefit of adaptive null-steering using real-world signals

References

• Allen J.B. 1977. Short term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process, 25, 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.5-1997 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Tubbs J.L., Egge J.L., Flamme G.A., Dittberner A.B. 2004. Evaluation of an adaptive directional algorithm in a DSP hearing aid, Am J Audiol, 13, 73–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler R., Palmer C., Mueller H.G. 2006. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner H., Aichner R., Kellermann W. 2005. A generalization of blind source separation algorithms for convolutive mixtures based on second-order statistics, IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing, 13, 120–134.
   Google Scholar
• Cord M., Surr R., Walden B., Dyrlund O. 2004 Relationship between lab-oratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 353–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cord M., Surr R., Walden B., Olsen L. 2002. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 295–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox H., Zeskind R.M., Owen M.M. 1987. Robust adaptive beamforming. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing, 35, 1365–1376.
   Google Scholar
• Crochiere R.E., Rabiner L.R. 1983. Multirate Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Doclo S., Spriet, A., Wouters J., Moonen M. 2005. Speech distortion weighted multi-channel wiener filtering techniques for noise reduction. J. Benesty, S. Makino Speech Enhancement, NY: Springer, 199–228.
   Google Scholar
• Elko G.W., Pong A-T. Nguyen . 1995. A simple adaptive first-order differential microphone. in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Foster S. 1986. Impulse response measurement using Golay codes. Proc. IEEE Int Conf on Acoust Sp and Sig Proc, 929–932.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J.E., Zurek P.M. 1992. Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1662–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvarinen A, Karhunen J., Oja E. 2001. Independent Component Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson M., Nosal E-M. 2002. Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 931–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates J.M. 2008. Digital Hearing Aids. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kates J.M., Weiss M.R. 1996. A comparison of hearing-aid array-processing techniques. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 3138–3148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M., Schulein R., Christensen L., Fabry D., Revit L. . 1998. Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J, 51, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Killion M. 2004. Myths about hearing in noise and directional microphones. Hear Rev, 14, 16, 18–19, 72–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood M.E., Jones D.L., Bilger R.C., Lansing C.R., O’Brien W.D. . 2004. Performance of time- and frequency-domain binaural beamformers based on recorded signals from real rooms. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C., Bentler R., Mueller H.G. 2006. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovic C.V. 1987. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J. 2005. A speech intelligibility index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 2181–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Bentler R.A. 1996. The effect of test signal type and band-width on the categorical scaling of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 2281–2287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Henry P. 2002. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 41, 100–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Hornsby B.W.Y. 2003. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit. Ear Hear, 24, 472–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 1999. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I: Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear Hear, 20, 182–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2002. Tolerable hearing aids delays. II: Estimation of limits imposed during speech production. Ear Hear, 23, 325–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2003. Tolerable hearing aids delays. III: Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear Hear, 24, 175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. 2005. Tolerable hearing aids delays. IV: Effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects. Ear Hear, 26, 225–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden B, Surr R, Cord M. 2003. Real-world performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Hear J, 56, 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Walden B., Surr R., Cord M., 2005. Real-world performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Walden B., Surr R., Cord M., Dyrlund O. 2004. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 365–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walden B., Surr R., Cord M., Edwards B., Olson L. 2000. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 540–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods W.S., Trine T.D. 2004. Limitations of theoretical benefit from an adaptive directional algorithm in reverberant environments. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 5, 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W., Bradley J.S. 2009. Effect of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 922–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar