The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials

References

• Adobe Systems Incorporated. 2006. Adobe Audition (Version 2.0) (computer software). San Jose, USA: Adobe Systems Inc.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1999. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. ANSI S3.1-1999. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 2004. Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-2004. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1988. Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA, 30, 85–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1990. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle-ear disorders. ASHA, 32, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ashoor A.A., Prochazka T. 1985. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry for children. Br J Audiol, 19, 229–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer R.S., Benedict P.K. 1997. Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Edgerton B.J., Svihovec D.V. 1977. A comparison of the Auditec of St. Louis cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on a normal-hearing population. J Speech Hear Disord, 42, 60–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Svihovec D.V., Edgerton B.J. 1975. Relative intelligibility of the CID spondees as presented via monitored live voice. J Speech Hear Disord, 40, 84–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradlow A.R., Pisoni D.B. 1999. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2074–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandy W.T. 2002. Speech Audiometry. J. Katz, R.F. Burkard, L. Medwetsky Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 96–110.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D.D., Takayanagi S., Moshfegh A. 2001. Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 233–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldert E., Davis H. 1951. The articulation function of patients with conductive deafness. Laryngoscope, 41, 891–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry J., Rubino C. 2001. Facts About the World's Languages: An Encyclopedia of the World's Major Languages, Past and Present. New York: H.W. Wilson.
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Kim E., Eggett D.L. 2003a. Psychometrically equivalent Korean bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Korean J Commun Disord, 8, 217–243.
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Nielson W.S., McPherson D.L., Skarzynski H. 2004. Psychometrically equivalent Polish bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers. Audiofonologia, 25, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Harris R.W., Nissen S.L. 2007. Brigham Young University Cantonese Speech Audiometry Materials (Compact Disc 1.0). Provo, USA: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Hart L.A. 2008. Development of Thai speech aaudiometry materials for measuring speech recognition thresholds. Unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I.J., Davis H., Silverman S.R., Reynolds E.G., Eldert E. . 1952. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord, 17, 321–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudgins C.V., Hawkins J.E., Karlin J.E., Stevens S.S. 1947. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, 57, 57–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kei J., Smyth V. 1997. Measuring the ability of hearing-impaired children to understand connected discourse: A comparison of two methods. Br J Audiol, 31, 283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau C.C., So K.W. 1988. Material for Cantonese speech audiometry constructed by appropriate phonetic principles. Br J Audiol, 22, 297–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehiste I., Peterson G. 1959. Linguistic considerations and intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 31, 280–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung M.T., Law S.P., Fung S-Y. 2004. Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 500–505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangum T.C. 2005. Performance intensity functions for digitally recorded Japanese speech audiometry materials. Unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Martin F.N., Champlin C.A., Perez D.D. 2000. The question of phonetic balance in word recognition testing. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 489–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEnery A., Xiao Z. 2004. The Lancaster corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. (Powerpoint slides) M. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreire, R. Costa, R. Silva, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) 2004, Lisbon, May 24–30, 2004. (1175–1178).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 2, 1085–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Jennings L.J., Eggett D.L., Buck H. 2005a. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers. Int J Audiol, 44, 379–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Jennings L., Eggett D.L., Buck H. 2005b. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin. Int J Audiol, 44, 391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Dukes A. 2007. Word recognition materials for native speakers of Taiwan Mandarin. Am J Audiol, 17, 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Penrod J.P. 1980. A comparison of half- vs full-list speech discrimination scores in a hearing-impaired geriatric population. J Aud Res, 20, 181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramkissoon I. 2001. Speech recognition thresholds for multilingual populations. Commun Disord Q, 22, 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon I., Proctor A., Lansing C.R., Bilger R.C. 2002. Digit speech recognition thresholds for non-native speakers of English. Am J Audiol, 11, 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roup C.M., Wiley T.L., Safady S.H., Stoppenbach D.T. 1998. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol, 7, 55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studio Audio & Video Ltd. 2004. SADiE disk editor software. [5.2.2]. [Computer Program].
   Google Scholar
• Weisleder P., Hodgson W.R. 1989. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition-ability lists. Ear Hear, 10, 387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill T.L. 1997. Speech intelligibility in Cantonese speakers with congenital dysarthria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Williams C. 2008. Psychometrically equivalent Thai monosyllabic word recognition materials spoken my male and female talkers. Unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., McArdle R. 2005. Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 79–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Carter A.S. 2001. Relation between slopes of word recognition psychometric functions and homogeneity of the stimulus materials. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 7–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Oyler A.L. 1997. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker. Ear Hear, 18, 430–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Strouse A. 1999. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 1336–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L., Soli S.D. 2005. Development of the Cantonese hearing in noise test (CHINT). Ear Hear, 26, 276–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao R. 2005. The PDC2000 Corpus of Chinese News Text. Retrieved January 3, 2006, from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/corplang/pdc2000/default.htm.
   Google Scholar