Neural indices of spoken word processing in background multi-talker babble

References

• Anderson J.E. Holcomb J.E. 1995. Auditory and visual priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 32, 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett M. 1972. The distribution of manual asymmetry. Br J Psychol, 63(3), 343–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AUDiTEC (n.d.). Multitalker noise (20 talkers) [CD146]. St. Louis, USA: Auditec, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Aydelott J. Bates E. 2004. Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on lexical access. Language Cogn Processes, 19 (1), 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Aydelott J., Dick, F. Mills D.L. 2006. Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on event-related potentials to spoken words. Psychophysiology, 43, 454–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin S., Kutas M. Hillyard S.A. 1993. Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst A.W. Plomp R. 1989. Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners, J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1508–1516.
   Google Scholar
• Brualla J., Romero M.F., Serrano M. Valdizan J.R. 1998. Auditory event-related potentials to semantic priming during sleep. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 108, 283–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao L.L. Knight R.T. 1996. Prefrontal and posterior cortical activation during auditory working memory. Cogn Brain Res, 4, 27–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao L.L. Knight R.T. 1997. Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao L.L. Knight R.T. 1998. Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance. J Cogn Neurosci, 10(2), 167–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao L.L., Nielsen-Bohlman L. Knight R.T. 1995. Auditory event-related potentials dissociate early and late memory processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 157–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connolly J.F. Phillips N.A. 1994. Event-related components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. J Cogn Neurosci, 6, 256–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly J.F., Phillips N.A., Stewart S.H. Brake W.G. 1992. Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain Lang, 43, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall C. Smaldino J. 2002. Room acoustics and auditory rehabilitation technology. J.Katz Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 607–630.
   Google Scholar
• D'Arcy R.C.N. Service E., Connolly J.F. Hawco C.S. 2005. The influence of increased working memory load on semantic neural systems: A high-resolution event-related potential study. Cog Brain Res, 22(2), 177–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daltrozzo J., Wioland N. Kotchoubey B. 2005, September. Explicit and implicit mechanisms of semantic priming: ERP effects to masked sentences. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Daltrozzo J., Wioland N. Kotchoubey B. 2007. Sex differences in two event-related potentials components related to semantic priming. Arch Sex Behav, 36(4), 555–568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deacon D., Mehta A., Tinsley C. Nousak J.M. 1995. Variation in the latencies and amplitudes of N400 and NA as a function of semantic priming. Psychophysiology, 32, 560–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien J. 2010. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psycholphysiology, 47, 170–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien J., Beal D.J. Berg P. 2005. Optimizing principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clin Neurophysiol, 116 (8), 1808–1825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A.L., Hymel M.R., Cranford J.L. DeChicchis A.R. 2000. Electrophysiologic signs of auditory distraction in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagoort P. Brown C.M. 2000. ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518–1530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannemann R., Obleser J. Eulitz C. 2007. Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech. Brain Res, 1153, 134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer K.S. Wilber L.A. 1990. Hearing loss, age, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 149–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helfer K.S. Vargo M. 2009. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol, 20(4), 264–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holcomb P.J. 1993. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb P.J. Neville H.J. 1990. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related potentials. Lang Cogn Proc, 5, 281–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser J., Bruder G., Tenke C., Stuart B., Amador X. . 2001. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in schizophrenia for tonal and phonetic oddball tasks. Biol Psychiatry, 15, 832–847.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R. 1992. Auditory processing of speech. J. Katz, N.A. SteckerD. Henderson Central Auditory Processing: A Transdisciplinary View. St. Louis: Mosby, 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kotz S.A. 2001. Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: A comparison of reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Lang Cogn, 4 (2), 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kotz S.A. Elston-Guttler K. 2004. The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials, J Neurolinguistics, 17, 215–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozou H., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Toppila E., Starck J. . 2005. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity. Hear Res, 199, 31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kucera H. Francis W.N. 1967. Computational analysis of Present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas M. Federmeier F.D. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension, Trends Cogn Sci, 4, 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas M. Hillyard S.A. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas M. Hillyard S.A. 1989. An electrophysiological probe of incidental semantic association. J Cognitive Neurosci, 1(1), 38–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin B., Kurtzberg D. Stapells D. 1999. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the MMN to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 271–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin B.A., Sigal A., Kurtzberg D. Stapells D.R. 1997. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 1585–1599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin B.A. Stapells D.R. 2005. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech. Ear Hear, 26(2), 195–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L. Korczak P. 2008. Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 285–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys S.L., Brooks J. Cooke M. 2009. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cogn Psych, 59(3), 203–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum W.C., Farmer S.F. Pocock P.V. 1984. The effects of semantic and physical incongruities on auditory event related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 59, 477–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNamara T.P. 2005. Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta J. 2008. The semantic priming effect across the life-span: An ERP study examining processing negativity. Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69 (8-B), 4714. (UMI No. AAT 3323625) Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations and Theses database.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta J., Jerger S., Jerger J. Martin J. 2009. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: Event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA). Intl J Audiol, 48(1), 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F. Chermak G. 2007. Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis (Vol. I). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Naätanen R. 1990. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Beh Brain Sci, 13, 201–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A. Pickett J. 1974. Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 56, 628–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely J.H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J Exp Psychol G, 106, 226–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely J.H. 1991. Semantic priming effects on visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. D. Besner G.W. Humphreys. Basic Processes on Reading: Visual Word Recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 264–336.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson D.L., McEvoy C.L. Schreiber T.A. 1998. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme and Word Fragment Norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
   Google Scholar
• Scott S.K., Rosen S., Wickham L. Wise R.J.S. 2004. A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 115(2), 813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Ahveninen J., Tervaniemi M., Alku P. . 1998. Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: Magnetic mismatch negativity study. Neuroscience Letters, 251, 141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. 2002. Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli. J. Katz, R.F. Burkhard L. Modwetsky. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 5th, New York: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhauer K. Connolly J.F. 2008. Event-related potentials in the study of language. B. Stemmer H. Whitaker. Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language. New York: Elsevier, 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting K.A., Martin B.A. Stapells D.R. 1998. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear, 19, 218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P.C.M., Perrachione T.K. Parrish T.D. 2007. Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Hum Brain Mapp, 28, 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P.C.M., Uppunda A.K., Parrish T.B. Dha S. 2008. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41(4), 1026–1039.
   Google Scholar