Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification

References

• Albrecht J., Elewout L., van Verhage L. & Verweij C. 2005. Oorcheck: De validering van een interactief screeningsinstrument. Internal report, LUMC Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Biassoni E.C., Serra M.R., Richtert U., Joekes S., Yacci M.R. . 2005. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part II: Development of hearing disorders. Int J Audiol, 44, 74–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman A.J. 1989. Speech perception by the hearing impaired, Thesis, University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman A.J. & Smoorenburg G.F. 1995. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal-hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung D.Y. & Mack B. 1979. The effect of masking by noise on word discrimination scores in listeners with normal-hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol, 8, 139–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung J.H., Des Roches C.M., Meunier J. & Eavey R.D. 2005. Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss in young people using a web-based survey technique. Pediatrics, 115, 861–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culling J.F., Zhao F. & Stephens D. 2005. The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment. Int J Audiol, 44, 691–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis N., Kuijpers M., Pijl S. & van der Verbiest E. 2006. Ontwikkeling van een gehoorscreening voor het bedrijfsleven. Internal report, LUMC Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Festen J.M. & Smits C. 2007. Is speech reception in stationary noise suitable for screening noise induced hearing damage? Ned Tijdschr KNO-Heelk, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongmans P., Martens M. & Dreschler W.A. 2008. Analyse van de hoortesten van de Nationale Hoorstichting. Intern rapport, Nationale Hoorstichting, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers S.M. 2007. Bedrijfsoorcheck, een spraak in ruis test via internet speciaal voor werknemers. Internal report, LUMC Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Leensen, M.C.J., Laat, J.A.P.M., de Snik, A.F.M, Dreschler, W.A. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, accepted, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens M.K., Perenboom R.J.M., Ploeg C.P.B. & van der Dreschler W.A. 2005. Oorcheck: Analyse van gehoortesten voor jongeren over de periode april 2004–oktober 2004. TNO-rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. 1996. Epidemiological evaluation of hearing damage related to strongly amplified music (personal cassette players, discotheques, rock concerts): High-definition audiometric survey on 1364 subjects. Audiology, 35, 121–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafapour S.P., Lahargoue K. & Gates G.A. 1998. Noise-induced hearing loss in young adults: The role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise. Laryngoscope, 108, 1832–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCvB 2010. Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2010. Internal report. Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Niskar A.S., Kieszak S.M., Holmes A.E., Esteban E., Rubin C. . 2001. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994, United States. Pediatrics, 108, 40–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen E., Salmivalli A. & Suonpaa J. 1990. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing. Scand Audiol, 19, 31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Rappaport J.M. & Gulliver J.M. 1994. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: Contribution of temporal resolution defect. Am J Otol, 15, 679–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979a. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979b. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1333–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1986. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 146–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S., Thorud E. & Aasand G. 1979. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 360, 90–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Lyzenga J., Dreschler W.A. & Festen J.M. 2010. Modelling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1570–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooij J.C.G.M. & van Plomp R. 1992. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1028–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCENIHR. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2008. Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function. Brussels, Belgium; European Commission, October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S., Gopal B., Reis J. & Novak M. 2009. Hear today, gone tomorrow: An assessment of portable entertainment player use and hearing acuity in a community sample. J Am Board Fam Med, 22, 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2005. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Ear Hear, 26, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Merkus P. & Houtgast T. 2006. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol, 31, 436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2007. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol, 46, 134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F., de Laat J.A. & Plomp R. 1982. The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Scand Audiol Suppl, 16, 123–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1990. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 469, 38–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli S.D. & Wong L.L. 2008. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 47, 356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Brug J., van der Ploeg C.P. & Raat H. 2009. Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: Expert opinions from a Delphi study. Pediatrics, 123, 1257–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Brug J., van der Ploeg C.P. & Raat H. 2007. Young people’s exposure to loud music: A summary of the literature. Am J Prev Med, 33, 124–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F., Manchaiah V.K., French D. & Price S.M. 2010. Music exposure and hearing disorders: An overview. Int J Audiol, 49, 54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar