A comparison of the perceptual evaluation of speech production between bilaterally implanted children, unilaterally implanted children, children using hearing aids, and normal-hearing children

References

• Aaronson A.E. 1990. Clinical Voice Disorders, New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Allen C., Nikolopoulos T.P., Dyar D. & O'Donoghue G.M. 2001. Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol, 22, 631–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G.V. & Pastorelli C. 1996. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 206–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck N.L., Buekers R., Gillebert S. & Van Lierde K.M. 2009. Speech intelligibility of Flemish children as judged by their parents. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 61, 288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck N., Dhooge I., D'haeseleer E. & Van Lierde K. 2010. A comparison of consonant production between Dutch children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 74, 416–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P.J., Barry J.G. & Jacq P.J. 2001. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. Speech Lang Hear Res, 44, 73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter A.K., Dillon C.M. & Pisoni D.B. 2002. Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: Suprasegmental analyses. Clin Linguist Phon, 16, 619–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti L. 2009. Long-term follow-up of infants (4–11 months) fitted with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol, 129, 361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bodt M.S., Wuyts F.L., Van de Heyning P.H. & Croux C. 1997. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice, 11, 74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bodt M.S., Hernández-Díaz H.M. & Van De Heyning P.H. 2002. Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord, 35, 283–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Krom G. 1994. Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hearing Res, 37, 985–1000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eccles J.S., Wigfield A. & Schiefele U. 1998. Motivation to succeed. Eisenberg N.. Handbook of Child Psychology, New York: Wiley. 1051–1075.
   Google Scholar
• Harding A. & Grunwell P. 1996. Characteristics of cleft palate speech. Eur J Disord Comm, 31, 331–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirano M. 1981. Clinical Examination of Voice. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar-Boltezar I., Boltezar M. & Zargi M. 2008. The influence of cochlear implantation on vowel articulation. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 120, 228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horga D. & Liker M. 2006. Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers. Clin Linguist Phon, 20, 211–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram D.. 1982. Procedures for Phonological Analysis of Children's Language. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Phonetic Association. 1949. The Principles of the International Phonetic Association. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Kotby M.N., Titze I.R., Saleh M.M. & Berry D.A. 1993. Fundamental frequency stability in functional dysphonia. Acta Otolaryngol, 31, 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn-Inacker H., Shehata-Dieler W., Müller J. & Helms J. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants: A way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J., Peters R., Lake J. . 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 648–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M.J. 1992. Speech intelligibility in the hearing impaired: Research and clinical implications. Kent R.D. Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory, Measurement and Management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Brooks A. & Hedge M.N. 2000. Assessment and Treatment of Articulation and Phonological Disorders in Children. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Peters B.R., Litovsky R, Parkinson A. & Lake J. 2007. Importance of age and post implantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 28, 649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Falzone S.J. 1988. Speech disorders related to craniofacial structural defects, Part 2. N.J. Lass, L.V. McReynolds, J.L. Northern, D.E. Yoder. Handbook of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology. Toronto: Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Philips B., Corthals P., De Raeve L., D'haenens W., Maes L. . 2009. Impact of newborn hearing screening: Comparing outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope, 119, 974–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauwers K., Gillis S., Daemers K., De Beukelaer C., De Ceulaer G. . 2004. Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otol Neurotol, 25, 924–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf F.W., Van Deun L., Van Wieringen A., Wouters J., Desloovere C. . 2009. Functional outcome of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in young children: 36 months postoperative results, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 73, 723–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf F., Van Deun L., Van Wieringen A., Wouters J., Desloovere C. 2009. Three-year post implantation auditory outcomes in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 118, 336–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Borsel J. 1996. Articulation in Down's syndrome adolescents and adults. Eur J Disord Com, 36 (1996) 415–444.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., Van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2010. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 5, 702–713.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., Van Wieringen A., Scherf F., Deggouj N., Desloovere C. 2010. Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol, 15, 7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde K.M., Vinck B.M., Baudonck N., De Vel E. & Dhooge I. 2005. Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: A pilot study. Int J Audiol, 8, 452–465.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeire K., Brokx J.P., Van de Heyning P.H., Cochet E. & Carpentier H. 2003. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 67, 67–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitler D.M., Kessler M.A., Terushkin V., Roland T.J., Svirsky M.A. 2008. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: A retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol, 29, 314–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar