References
- Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21(4, Suppl.), 37S–49S.
- Bertoli S., Bodmer D. & Probst R. 2010. Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: Associations with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing aid signal processing, and hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 49(5), 333–46.
- Boymans M., Goverts S.T., Kramer S.E., Festen J.M. & Dreschler W.A. 2009. Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: A retrospective multicenter study. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52(1), 130–40.
- Costa P.T. & McCrae R.R. 1992. NEO-PI-R. Professional Manual, Odessa, USA: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Gray G. 1999. Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 10(1), 1–13.
- Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 1999. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear, 20(4), 306–20.
- Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 4, Suppl., 106S–115S.
- Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2000. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol, 11(7), 368–82.
- Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2001. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear, 22(2), 151–60.
- Cox R.M. 2003. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: Getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol, 42, Suppl. 1, S90–6.
- Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Gray G.A. 2005. Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing aid seekers. Ear Hear, 26(1), 12–26.
- Dillon H., James A. & Ginis J. 1997. Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 8(1), 27–43.
- Gatehouse S. 1999. A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. Health Bull (Edinb), 57(6), 424–36.
- Gerlitz J.-Y. & Schupp, J. 2005. Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
- Heuermann H., Kinkel M. & Tchorz J. 2005. Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in various studies. Int J Audiol, 44(2), 102–9.
- Knudsen L.V., Oberg M., Nielsen C., Naylor G. & Kramer S.E. 2010. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use, and satisfaction with hearing AIDS: A review of the literature. Trends Amplif, 14(3), 127–54.
- Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschler W.A., Boymans M. & Festen J.M. 2002. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41(1), 36–41.
- Kricos P.B. 2000. The influence of nonaudiological variables on audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear, 21(4, Suppl.), 7S–14S.
- Meister H., Walger M., Brehmer D., von Wedel U.C. & von Wedel H. 2008. The relationship between pre-fitting expectations and willingness to use hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 47(4), 153–9.
- Uriarte M., Denzin L., Dunstan A., Sellars J. & Hickson L. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol, 16(6), 383–402.